| SCANNER TYPE COMPARISONS
|
| Scanner
Type
| Strong Points
|
Weak
Points
|
Future
Improvements
|
|
1. Dual Axis Tilting Arm and Bridge Manual Scanner
| Light weight; works well with modular systems; can be used around raised rivets; price is moderate. Integrates easily with eddy current, ultrasonic, and resonance
instruments.
|
Encoder slides when arm gets wet; mechanism holding sensors not well designed; labor intensive to operate; adequate for small area scans only.
| Independent hand vacuum pumps for three suction cup feet that provides adaptability to many surface geometries and overhead operation.
|
| 2. Dual Axis Tilting Arm and Bridge Automated Scanner
| Efficient, easy operation over long inspection times; compact and light weight automated system; good for small and large area scans.
| Spring forces on tilting arm are not adequate or constant for general vertical and overhead operation; sensor holder scratches aluminum surface
| Develop a pneumatic tension system for the tilting arm to provide adequate and constant pressure at the sensor to surface interface.
|
| 3. Radial
Axis Tilting
Arm with
Rotation Axis
Bridge
Manual
Scanner
| Versatile for many surface geometries and large curvatures; can articulate over a large area without repositioning. Integrates easily with eddy current, ultrasonic, and resonance instruments.
| Labor intensive for scan times longer than one hour and overhead operation; sensor holder leaves scratches on aluminum surfaces even with Teflon tape over sensor.
| Design of a frictionless sensor holder; a set of larger suction cup feet needs to be available for greater adherence to the surface in the overhead
operation.
|
| 4. Dual Axis
Cantilever
Arm Bridge
Manual or
Automated
Scanner
| Very adaptable for large area scans; automated system is not labor intensive; Areal coverage for C-scan images is easier to obtain than with manual tilting arm systems.
| System design is heavy and not as easy to implement as tilting arm scanners; manual system is labor intensive in vertical and overhead operation.
| Design of a frictionless sensor holder that maintains sensor perpendicularity over nominal panel curvatures; check valves on multiple suction cup feet need to be installed for positive adherence at all times.
|
| 5. Mobile Automated Ultrasonic Scanner
| Fast, efficient linear areal scans of widths from 2, 4, 6, or 8 inches, fast and easy mode change for eddy current, ultrasonic, or resonance testing.
| Encoder wheels slide when they get wet from the ultrasonic couplant; scanner head is heavy and nor easy to operate for vertical and overhead operation
| Design of a light weight head; frictionless sensor holders; and positive traction encoder wheels are needed.
|
| 6. Dual Axis
Rectangular
Bridge
Automated
Scanner
| Adaptable for large area scans of moderate curvatures; most useful for squirter technology over raised rivets and protrusions etc.
| System design is heavy and rigid; not flexible for different surface geometries.
| Design of a surface tracking device for implementation with squirter or captured water column technology.
|
| 7. Hands Free
X-Y Digitizer
| Free movement of sensor over complex surface geometries.
| False position data occurs frequently from environmental noise and multiple paths within the
aluminium structure.
| Noise immunity algorithm needs to be developed and a method of decoupling the source waves from the structure surface.
|
| 8. 2-D Square Transducer Array
| Adaptable for fast characterization of inspected area; straight forward to apply and obtain inspection data; Excellent resolution of thin skin thickness and defect location for boron/epoxy repair patches.
| Transducer array can not be used over protrusions like raised rivets etc. Gray scale display used during demonstration lacked contrast needed for easy interpretation of the inspection results.
| Large color monitor would improve viewing and interpreting the inspection results, a number of parallel vacuum seals with check valves to improve initial application of the array to the surface. |