· Home· Table of Contents · Training, Certification & Codes | A global view on standardization in ultrasonic testingUdo SchlengermannKrautkrämer GmbH, Hürth, Germany Contact |
Technical standards not only open markets, but can also be barriers for trade. Global markets are more a dream than reality, cultures and economical potential of continents and countries greatly differ. But global manufacturing is reality. Supply parts from all regions of the world are assembled into final products. This global trade leads to a growing demand for agreements on common technical specifications, especially in the sector of nondestructive testing which is directly related to quality and safety.
Keywords: Nondestructive testing, ultrasonic testing, qualification, certification, international standardization, world trade zones, technical barrier treaty.
Standards in the field of nondestructive testing can be looked upon from very different points of view: the methods are not material specific, the techniques are not restricted to special industries nor to special products. Ultrasonic examinations, based on the the same physical phenomena, can be used in very different fields such as medical diagnosis and therapy, in chemical treatment and in mechanical engineering. There are not many similarities as seen from the point of view of specific product requirements which require ultrasonic inspection. There are techniques for metals and plastics, on detection and on sizing of defects, for material characterization and for quality estimation of bonds. Standards describe the state-of-the art and have been integrated into different systems of technical education and therefore they may be different although they are related to the same object, e.g. ultrasonic testing of butt welds in steel. Nevertheless we are in the millenium of global manufacturing now and have to construct an accepted worldwide system of standards all aspects in quality management so far as nondestructive testing, especially ultrasonic testing, is concerned.
Nondestructive testing techniques are used under two main aspects:
Recent studies have shown [1] that international standards have a strong positive impact on the increase in foreign trade, e.g. more than patents, whereas national standards have a more negative effect.
To understand the development of international standards in NDT it is important to know the political and economical background related to the main aspects of
| Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum, | with 21 members, from Australia to Vietnam, including Japan, Russia and the United States of America, having an equal balanced trade flow in 2000 of 2592 billion US$ in exports and 2581 billion US$ in imports. European Union, with 19 members, | from Austria to the United Kingdom, including EFTA countries, having a trade flow in 2000 of 813 billion US$ in exports and 801 US$ in imports. with 15 members from Argentina to Uruguay, including Australia but more an agricultural market, trade flow in 2000 of 577 billion US$ in exports and 549 billion US$ in imports.
| North-American Free Trade Agreement, | with 3 members, Canada, United States of America, Mexico, and a trade flow in 2000 of 1017 billion US$ in exports and 1277 billion US$ in imports. But this zone also concentrates more on agriculture, environment and labour. |
From this list you can see, that the impact on technical standardization will come from only three zones: North-America, Asia-Pacific Region and Europe. For example these are exactly the global players in the automotive industry, but this also applies to other industries.
If the zones and the relevant industries are influenced by the United States, e.g. civil aviation, automotive, oilfield equipment, we will find the main US standards systems: API, ASME, ASTM, ASW and for NDT personnel ASNT, i.e. the standard system is made by a lot of different non-profit organizations. In Europe the system is quite different: A political agreement was made to construct the European Union as a single Market by tearing down tariff and non-tariff boundaries, e.g. by generating a unique system of technical standards under the directives of the European Commission. This means that there is a political demand for new or harmonized standards (mandated standards) to fill the frame-work given by the directives. An example is the Pressure Equipment Directive, PED (97/23EC) where the inspection sector has been filled with new standards on weld testing using all NDT methods, including ultrasonics.
We now have identified the main global trade zones and the big industrial groups having their headquarters there.
| International Organization for Standardization/
| International Electrotechnical Commission European Committee for Standardization/
| European Comittee for Electrotechnical Standardization. |
Some additional remarks on international technical standards should be made. In general standards are no laws, e.g. standards are always non-mandatory. But they can be referenced in laws thus making them quasi legal documents which are mandatory. Systems of standards are usually called codes. Sometimes codes are used as legal documents. The most important example in NDT is the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code which has a counter part by the code developed according to the European Pressure Equipment Directive.
Not all applications of nondestructive testing can be covered by international standards. Military/Defense (military alliances only) and Nuclear Safety are (unfortunately) strictly under national law.
But the remaining can be treated worldwide.
A scheme for building such a modular system of standards is shown in Figure 1. If you compare the traditional national systems against this scheme you will recognize some missing parts in your national system.
The main characteristics of the modules of the standards system in Figure 1 are:
Fig 1: Scheme of a complete standards system for nondestructive testing.
|
According to the scheme in Figure 1, Figure 2 is filled with the existing CEN standards, together with ISO standards if available. The appropriate Australian standards are mentioned in the text:
Fig 2: Standards system for the ultrasonic examination of welds in steel. |
Further information on international standards for weld testing is given in [2]. The problems of international standards on the qualification of NDT personnel are discussed in [3].
An overview of comparable international standards in ultrasonic testing (excluding acoustic emission) can be found in Table 1.
| CEN Standard | ISO Standard | Remarks | ||
| EN 473 | Nondestructive testing - Qualification and certification of NDT personnel - General principles | ISO 9712 | Nondestructive testing - Qualification and certification of personnel | comparable |
| EN 1330-1 | Nondestructive testing - Terminology - part 1: General terms | |||
| EN 1330.2 | Nondestructive testing - Terminology - part 2: Terms common to the nondestructive testing methods | |||
| EN 1330-4 | Nondestructive testing - Terminology - part 4: Terms used in ultrasonic testing | ISO 5577 | Nondestructive Testing - Ultrasonic inspection - Vocabulary | comparable |
| EN 1712 | Nondestructive examination of welds - Ultrasonic examination of welded joints - Acceptance levels | ISO | New work item | |
| EN 1713 | Nondestructive ultrasonic examination - Characterization of indications in welds | ISO | New work item | |
| EN 1714 | Nondestructive examination of welds - Ultrasonic examination of welded joints | ISO 17640 | Nondestructive examination of welds - Ultrasonic examination of welded joints | comparable |
| EN 10256 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - Qualification and competence of level 1 and 2 nondestructive testing personnel | ISO 11484 | Steel tubes for pressure purposes - Qualification and certification of nondestructive testing personnel | comparable |
| EN 12062 | Nondestructive examination of welds - General rules for metallic materials | ISO 17635 | Nondestructive examination of welds - General rules for metallic materials | equivalent |
| EN 12223 | Nondestructive testing - Ultrasonic examination - Specification for calibration block no 1 | ISO 2400 | Welds in steel - Reference block for the calibration of equipment for ultrasonic examination | comparable |
| EN 13296 | Testing concrete - Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity | ISO 8047 | Concrete, hardened - Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity | comparable |
| EN 13919-1 | Welding - Electron and laser-beam welded joints - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections - part 1: Steel | ISO 13919-1 | Welding - Electron and laser-beam welded joints - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections | identical |
| EN 13919-2 | Welding - Electron and laser-beam welded joints - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections - part 2: Aluminium and ist weldable alloys | ISO 13919-2 | Welding - Electron and laser-beam welded joints - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections - part 2: Aluminium and ist weldable alloys | identical |
| EN 25817 | Arc-welded joints in steel - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections | ISO 5817 | Arc-welded joints in steel - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections | identical |
| EN 27963 | Welds in steel - Calibration block no 2 for ultrasonic examination of welds | ISO 7963 | Welds in steel - Calibration block no 2 for ultrasonic examination of welds | identical |
| EN 30042 | Arc-welded joint in aluminium and its weldable alloys - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections | ISO 10042 | Arc-welded joint in aluminium and its weldable alloys - Guidance on quality levels for imperfections | identical |
| Table 1: List of comparable international standards on ultrasonic testing. | ||||
Special standards on NDT personnel are listed in Table 2.
| CEN Standard | ISO Standard | Remarks | ||
| EN 473 | Nondestructive testing - Qualification and certification of NDT personnel - General principles | ISO 9712 | Nondestructive testing - Qualification and certification of personnel | comparable |
| EN 10256 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - Qualification and competance of level 1 and 2 nondestructive testing personnel | ISO 11484 | Steel tubes for pressure purposes - Qualification and certification of nondestructive testing personnel | equivalent |
| EN | Limited NDT | ISO | Limited NDT | started |
| Table 2: Standards on qualification of nondestructive testing personnel. | ||||
A further example of successfully established international standards (by international agreement) is shown in Table 3: The field of automated ultrasonic testing of steel tubes.
| CEN Standard | ISO Standard | Remarks | ||
| EN 10246-6 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 6: Automatic full peripheral ultrasonic testing of seamless steel tubes for the detection of transverse imperfections | ISO 9305 | Seamless steel tubes for pressure purposes - Full peripheral ultrasonic testing for the detection of transverse imperfections | equivalent |
| EN 10246-7 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 7: Automatic full peripheral ultrasonic testing of seamless and welded (except submerged-arc welded steel tubes for the detection of longitudinal imperfections | ISO 9303 | Seamless and welded (except submerged-arc welded) steel tubes for pressure purposes - Full peripheral ultrasonic testing for the detection of longitudinal imperfections | Equivalent |
| EN 10246-8 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 8: Automatic ultrasonic testing of the weld seam of electric welded steel tubes for the detection of longitudinal imperfections | ISO 9764 | Electric resistance and induction welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing of the weld seam for the detection of longitudinal imperfections | equivalent |
| EN 10246-9 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 9: Automatic ultrasonic testing of the weld seam of submerged-arc welded steel tubes for the detection of longitudinal and/or transverse imperfections | ISO 9765 | Submerged-arc welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing of the weld seam for the detection of longitudinal and/or transverse imperfections | equivalent |
| EN 10246-13 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 13: Automatic full peripheral ultrasonic thickness testing of seamless and welded (except submerged-arc welded) steel tubes | ISO 10543 | Seamless and hot-stretch-reduced welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Full peripheral ultrasonic thickness testing | equivalent |
| EN 10246-14 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 14: Automatic ultrasonic testing of seamless and welded (except submerged-arc welded) steel tubes for the detection of laminar imperfections | ISO 10124 | Seamless and welded (except submerged-arc welded) steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing for the detection of laminar imperfections | equivalent |
| EN 10246-15 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 15: Automatic ultrasonic testing of strip/plate used in the manufacture of welded steel tubes for the detection of laminar imperfections | ISO 12094 | Welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing for the detection of laminar imperfections in strips/plates used in the manufacture of welded tubes | equivalent |
| EN 10246-16 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 16: Automated ultrasonic testing of the area adjacent to the weld seam of welded steel tubes for the detection of laminar imperfections | ISO 13663 | Welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing of the area adjacent to the weld seam for the detection of laminar imperfections | equivalent |
| EN 10246-17 | Nondestructive testing of steel tubes - part 17: Ultrasonic testing of tube ends of seamless and welded steel tubes for the detection of laminar imperfections | ISO 11496 | Seamless and welded steel tubes for pressure purposes - Ultrasonic testing of tube ends for the detection of laminar imperfections | equivalent |
| Table 3: Standards on automated ultrasonic inspection of steel tubes. | ||||
The first attempts are made to insert American standards into the ISO system, especially API specifications (delivery conditions), where NDT is included, see Table 4.
| ISO Standard | US Specification | Remarks | ||
| ISO 3183-1 | Petroleum and natural gas industries - steel pipes for pipelines - Technical delivery condition - part 1: Pipes of requirement class A | API Spec 5L | Line pipe | comparable |
| ISO 3183-3 | Petroleum and natural gas industries - steel pipes for pipelines - Technical delivery condition - part 1: Pipes of requirement class C | API Spec 5L | Line pipe | comparable |
| ISO 10375 | Nondestructive testing - Ultrasonic inspection - Characterization of search unit and sound field | ASTM E1065 | Standard guide for evaluating characteristics of ultrasonic search units | Not identical |
| ISO 11960 | Petroleum and natural gas industries - Steel pipes for use as casing or tubing for wells | API Spec 5CT | Casing and tubing | comparable |
| ISO 11961 | Petroleum and natural gas industries - Steel pipes for use as drill pipe - Specification | API Spec 5D | Drill pipe | comparable |
| ISO 12709 | Nondestructive testing - Ultrasonic inspection - Detection and evaluation of discontinuities by the immersed pulse-echo ultrasonic method | ASTM E214 | Standard practice for immersed ultrasonic examination by the reflection method using pulsed longitudinal waves | Not identical |
| ISO 12710 | Nondestructive testing - Ultrasonic inspection - Evaluating electronic characteristics of instruments | ASTM E1324 | Standard guide for measuring some electronic characteristics of ultrasonic examination instruments | comparable |
| ISO 12715 | Ultrasonic nondestructive testing - Reference blocks and test procedures for the characterization of contact search unit beam profiles | ASTM | Contents from several specifications | comparable |
| ISO 18175 | Nondestructive testing - Evaluating performance characteristics of ultrasonic pulse-echo testing instruments without the use of electronic measurement instruments | ASTM E317 | Standard practice for evaluating performance characteristics of ultrasonic pulse-echo examination instruments without the use of electronic measurement instruments | comparable |
| Table 4: Comparable ISO standards and United States specifications on ultrasonic testing. | ||||
As explained, the international standardization does not simply mean acceptance of national standards to global markets. The WTO-TBT supports free trade by applying pressure against national certification schemes and protective technical barrier procedures, and promotes the use of international agreed standards under 6 principles:
| 1. Transparency | (i.e. access for all interested parties to the standardizing process); |
| 2. Openness | (i.e. open for all WTO members); |
| 3. Neutrality and consensus | (i.e. there are no privileged groups); |
| 4. Effectivity and relevance | (i.e. standards have to be shaped to market needs); |
| 5. Coherency | (i.e. double work or operlapping work has to be avoided); |
| 6. Development aspects | (i.e. access and benefits for developing countries). |
ISO/IEC and other international organizations such as OIML and OECD are observers to the WTO-TBT.
Countries who want to join the European Union, e.g. have to sign the Protocol on European Conformity Agreement (PECA), before entering. It means declaring implementation of the existing directives of the European Commission into their national technical rules, before entering the EU.
ISO and CEN have an agreement (Vienna agreement) on mutual information on their work, e.g. a stand-still agreement, i.e. not to start work in the same field if the other organization is already working on it. Furthermore there is an agreement to accept existing standards in the other organization if possible, to get identical - at least equivalent - standards. The growing Table 1 shows the preliminary results. There are different voting procedures in CEN and ISO to quickly accept new standards, e.g. the unique voting procedure or the parallel voting in both organizations.
The national NDT societies and their international federations, such as the European Federation for NDT (EFNDT) and the International Committee for NDT (ICNDT) can support this process of developing global NDT standards, especially in the sector of personnel qualification and certification.
As a kind of summary the following statements underline why international standardization is important in nondestructive testing as a worldwide business:
| © AINDT , created by NDT.net | |Home| |Top| |