| NDT.net - December 2002, Vol. 7 No.12 |
For both principles it is useful to have knowledge about realistic landmines, their structure and composition [5], what is more important for landmine triggers. Triggers are the rather non-homogeneous parts of landmines, hence rather complicated for characterisation. However, because of their seemingly artificial shape and existing metal parts triggers are parts that usually represent part of a mine which is actually detected, and extracted from noisy environment in.analysed signals. For example, if metal detectors are used than low metal content mines are detected only on the basis of metal blasting cup, metal trigger pin or its metal spring. Owing to variety of producers, produced types and different series of landmines, it is not known in advance whether landmines in a given area resemble completely dimensions and composition of other landmines, or there exist some differences. Additionally, there is a possibility of different types of damages in trigger components, the probability of which may be inferred on the basis of existing radiograms. Beside contribution to R&D process, radiograms of triggers are useful in education of pyrotechnicians and other personnel of a humanitarian demining process [6].
Somewhat similar problem exist in the context of unexploded ordnance disposal. A typical situation is to have grenade with steel casing, in which there may be a chemical agent. The procedures for its disposal differ significantly in case when there is a chemical agent, compared to a case when there is no such agent.
In order to formulate a data base of trigger characteristics which is to be used in testing processing algorithms, work was started toward formulation of data bases of landmine triggers, and development capabilities to represent triggers in a form appropriate in testing of a particular technique. In this paper the phase of database forming, in which radiograms of triggers are obtained and evaluated, is described.
The paper is organised as follows: in the second section characterisation of triggers is presented from various points of view, yet radiography excluded. In the third section the set-up of equipment and other relevant parameters for radiography of triggers is described. Radiograms obtained are discussed in the fourth section. Summary of important conclusions is given in the fifth section.
Fig 1: Triggers of several types of antipersonnel landmines. From left to right:UPROM 1, UPM 2A S, UPM 2A, UPMAH 3. |
| Type | UPROM 1 | UPM 2A S | UPM 2A | UPMAH 3 |
| Description | momentary, push or pull activation | momentary, activated by pulling | momentary, activated by pulling | momentary, antimagnetic, chemical, activated by pulling induced friction |
| Initial and detonating cab | E 67, M17* | E 67, - | E 67, DAK 8 | -, M 17 P2 |
| Metal content | high | high | high | low |
| Dimensions (height/main diameter, mm/mm) | 115/22 | 77/37 | 62/21 | 37/13 |
| Table 1: Some characteristics of triggers shown on figure 1. | ||||
Owing to almost axisymmetric shape, and relatively small dimensions, a trigger can be sufficiently covered using a single radiogram.
Fig 3: Trigger UPM 2A. Voltage during exposition was 80 kV.
|
Fig 4: Trigger UPROM 1. Voltage during exposition was 120 kV.
|
Fig 5: Trigger UPM 2A S. Voltages during expositions were 90 kV and 100 kV for left
and right radiogram, respectivelly.
|
In radiogram of figure 3, large difference between representations of trigger parts point to essentially different materials, e.g. steel parts in polymer casing. Such a difference does not exist on radiogram of figure 4, because there all the parts are metal. Radiograms of figure 5 show how changes in some parameters, in this case voltage, infer resolution obtained. From radiogram obtained with 100 kV, it is seen how the initial cab is connected through metal needle with a trigger head, which is made of relatively thick polymer layer. Absorption coefficients for materials similar to those used in triggers are given in Table 2.
| Material | Material Voltage, kV | µ /r , cm2 -g-1 | µ en/r , cm2 -g-1 |
| Aluminium | 80 | 0,2018 | 0,05511 |
| 100 | 0,1704 | 0,03794 | |
| Bakelite | 80 | 0,1707 | 0,02200 |
| 100 | 0,1602 | 0,02292 | |
| Table 2: Relevant absorption coefficients [9]. | |||
Fig 6: Picture of radiogram of etalon wires, obtained after the same
transformations as were applied to radiograms of triggers.
|
| © NDT.net - info@ndt.net | |Top| |