| NDT.net - March 2000, Vol. 5 No. 03 |
![]() Table of Contents ECNDT '98 Session: Chemical, Petrochemical |
Making NDT predictiveG. COCO, A. MARINO PROCONTROL S.R.L.VIA INAMA, 21 , 20133-MILANO, ITALY TEL.: +39 (02) 70101050 FAX: +39 (02) 70100504 Corresponding Author Contact: Email: pcontrol@procontrol-ndt.com |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Moreover, these agents have an aggressive impact on the machinery and equipment which process them. They produce different kinds of flaws (Cracks, Blisters, Stress_Corrosion), and make machinery and equipment loose part of their original thickness. As a consequence failures, undesired leaks of products, and other potentially dangerous situations may occur (explosions, pollution, ...)..
Manufacturing conditions tend to enhance these hazards because of the Heavy Conditions at which plants have to work:
Other risks are represented by Processing, Stock Transfers, Storage, Thermal and Mechanical stress.
Consequently all these elements contribute to make the whole processing system RISKY.
Such an Inspection Plan should also include:
This way it will be possible to avoid Leacks of products and dangerous substances as well as undesired and unexpected plant stops.
An increase in the number of spot surveys doesn't necessarily mean a more complete answer: "The more I do, the more I know" has always been the philosophy underlying this type of controls.
Instead better results can be achieved adopting a robust procedure that leads to the best control distribution.
This can be obtained if controls are planned and performed following these three fundamental principles :
Selection Criteria include locating the spots to be checked and defining the extent and frequency of surveys; they will be determined considering the following aspects:
As far as theAccuracy of Survey is concerned, the equipment currently used for this kind of measurements is based on accurate and sophisticated Technologies.
On the other hand, technicians must be aware of the philosophy underlying surveys. They have to know why surveys are carried out. To this purpose the following aspects should be considered:
Data Analysis
This is the real innovative aspect that we have been successfully developing in recent years and that has produced the LIFE_EXTENSION software with the idea to help all technicians and inspectors involved in internal corrosion monitoring of pipelines and vessels.
We obviously do not want, and surely would not be able, to take the place of specialists who manage plants and whose knowledge and experience are the most valuable asset of companies.
However this software can provide a supporting tool an aid for a better management of the thousands of thickness surveys usually performed for corrosion monitoring, and tipically printed on paper and left on a shelter to gather dust.
The philosophy of this software is, on the contrary, to capitalise the survey results and make them ready to be used and compared in the years to follow.
The goals of our Life Extension software can be summarised as follows:
To achieve these goals, our software is able to perform the following functions:
Example1:
| Section Parameters | Surveys | ||
| Rated Thickness | 6,3 mm | 1st Survey - May 1995 | 6,2 mm |
| Rated Corrosion Overthick. | 1,3 mm | 2nd Survey - May 1996 | 6,0 mm |
| Rejection Thickness | 5,0 mm | Thickness loss | 0,2 mm |
| Time period | 1 Year | Mean Corrosion Rate | 0,2 mm/Year |
If the same processing condition are kept, this section will reach the rejection thickness in 5 years from May 1996, that is to say May 2001
Should a comparison between the two last surveys not be possible, refrence can be made to previous surveys or even to the design data.
That's why it is possible to insert customised filters; INPUT TABLES not only refer to operational parameters (such as, for instance, Code of ultrasound operator, Material code, Piping class, Survey frequency code, Rated diameters, Rated thicknesses, Corrosion overthicknesses, Rejection thicknesses, Survey position code), but they can also provide information regarding the access to pipelines (Unfeasible spot code, Line code, Insulation code, Scaffolding code, Junction code). This allows to anticipate the estimate of costs related to the survey.
The procedure will also account for:
Encoding
Diversification of survey spots for every piping section is required.
Some sections are more critical because of:
It is useful to consider that, with the same fluid flooding, some areas are more critical because of:
Examples:
![]() Encoding for a vertical 90° curve | ![]() Encoding for a vertical "TEE" insertion |
Operational procedure
Surveys must always be made in the same position, in order to assure the accuracy of all thickness measurements even after years. The main reason why this procedure must be followed is that corrosion rate calculations must be based on the comparison between surveys of the same spot at different times and not on statistical calculations.
(A Thickness survey in the same spot even after years is absolutely feasible and reliable if the right procedures are applied)
Timing of surveys
It shall be fixed according to:
Example 2:
| Section Parameters | Surveys | ||
| Rated Thickness | 6,3 mm | 1st Survey - May 1995 | 6,2 mm |
| Rated Corrosion Overthick. | 1,3 mm | 2nd Survey - May 1996 | 6,2 mm |
| Rejection Thickness | 5,0 mm | Thickness loss | 0,0 mm |
| Time period | 1 Year | Mean Corrosion Rate | 0,0 mm/Year |
If a corrective coefficient is not used, the information given should be: Never ending Life.
The case shown in Example 2 could still be accepted, as the rejection thickness is still far from being reached.
But let's see Example 3:
| Section Parameters | Surveys | ||
| Rated Thickness | 6,3 mm | 1st Survey - May 1995 | 5,0 mm |
| Rated Corrosion Overthick. | 1,3 mm | 2nd Survey - May 1996 | 5,0 mm |
| Rejection Thickness | 5,0 mm | Thickness loss | 0,0 mm |
| Time period | 1 Year | Mean Corrosion Rate | 0,0 mm/Year |
If a corrective coefficient is not used, the information given should be: Never ending Life, while the section is already at the rejection thickness.
Correction procedures have been studied in The Life Extension program in order to always give an end of life date, automatically providing a relative corrosion rate equal to the mean of the whole pipeline (if it exists, it is reliable, because it is derived from the comparison of at least 80% of the spots on the pipelines) or at least 0,1 mm/Year.
Other corrections are activated in case the % of comparable spots is less than 100%; no results is given if the % of comparable spots is below 80%.
The Windows 95Ò version of the software, which is supposed to be ready by March '98, will obviously need more powerful hardware.
| © NDT.net - info@ndt.net | |Top| |