![]() ·Table of Contents ·Industrial Plants and Structures | Diagnostics and Forecasting of the Residual Life of Steel Structures After Long-Term ServiceV.I.Zagrebelny, A.A.Dubov, A.V.Mozgovoj, A.N.RudakovContact |
Fig 1: Block-diagram of forecasting the residual life of the structure
|
Fig 2: Diagram of distribution of magnetic field Hp around the perimeter of a butt welded joint in the zone of residual stress concentration:
a - Hp epure around the perimeter of the butt with concentration of residual stresses SC (in zones 1-4; along Hp = Oline);
b - Hp epure along the lower generatrix of the pipe in zones 1 and 2 with the maximal stress concentration.
|
K = |D
Hp| /D
lk.
| (1)
| |
Proceeding from the results of determination of K values for different sections with an abrupt change of Hp value, its maximal values and, hence, the maximal concentration of residual stresses, are determined.
In a number of cases, when the residual intensity of the structure magnetic field is distorted (the structure was exposed to external magnetic fields), a magnetic parameter, namely coercive force Hc which is related to the structure stressed-strained state [5] can be used. Fig. 3 presents characteristic dependencies of coercive force Hc at low-cycle fatigue (LCF) of sheets of Vst3sp5 steel, depending on the selected loading modes. At loads below the yield point, damage accumulation actively started after 5x104 cycles and was accompanied by the growth of the coercive force from Hc = 2.3 A/cm up to Hccrit = 5.6 ±
0.2 A/cm corresponding to the physical fatigue limit of 1x107 cycles at s
a = 20 kg/mm2 and 3x105 at s
a = 25 kg/mm2. With the increase of the loading amplitude above the yield point s
0.2 = 27 kg/mm2 accumulation of damage and strain started with the first loading cycles and reached saturation corresponding to Hccrit = 5.8 ± 0.2 A/cm after 5x104 cycles, this being a very stringent loading mode by the Rules of Gosgortechnadzor organization, Russia. Thus, having plotted similar dependencies for other steel grades used to make load-carrying metal structures of hoisting mechanisms (HM), it is possible to forecast their residual life directly by the results of evaluation of the value of coercive force HC.
Fig 3: Magnetic control of fracture resistance at low-cycle fatigue of Vst3sp5 steel sheets.
|
Detection of defects in the structure.
After performance of express-diagnostics for detection of the most critical sections of the structures, i.e. zones of stress concentration which are marked by chalk or paint, a more through flaw detection is conducted using specific NDT methods to detect structural defects.
As regards revealing the material discontinuities, i.e. defects which can be external, internal or through-thickness, application of non-destructive testing methods allows determination of both the defect presence and its size. The latter enables the defects to be divided into admissible and inadmissible.
One of the effective methods of defect detection in the structure is the application of an ultrasonic computerized P-scan system. This system allows visualization of internal defects in the structure walls, whereas its use in the same controlled sections after certain time intervals also allows tracing the dynamics of defects change. Fig. 4 shows [6] the results of ultrasonic testing of the structure sections, made in 1985 (a) and in 1987 (b). Fig. 2 shows that the number of lamination cracking zones has significantly increased during 2 years, which was also confirmed by the results of metallographic investigations. Determination of the changes of the structure geometrical dimensions caused by mechanical wear, corrosion, etc. is conducted with laser optical instruments allowing sagging and deformations in the structure to be revealed with its rather large dimensions. Measurement of the thickness of the structure walls in the case of access from one side, can be conveniently performed with ultrasonic thickness measurement units, providing the measurement accuracy not lower than ± 0.1 mm. Measurement of the wall thickness is performed in the zones of stress concentration, in the locations where corrosion traces are visible, near crossing points of the welds and the anticipated defects.
Corrosion damage of metal structures is differentiated by the kind of corrosion, namely total, spot corrosion, pitting, intercrystalline corrosion, corrosion fatigue, lamination corrosion, etc. Total corrosion and change of the geometrical parameters of the structures are easy to measure. It is performed similar to the case of mechanical wear. In a number of cases corrosion control of damage can be conducted with magnetic instruments which allow it to be performed under a protective cover [7].
The main mechanical properties of metallic materials are characterized by ultimate tensile strength s
T of the material, yield point s
0.2, impact toughness ac, et al. These mechanical properties can be approximately determined also by non-destructive testing methods by hardness measurement, as well as by evaluation of the magnetic properties.
The ultimate strength and yield point of steel are approximately determined based on non-destructive testing by hardness measurement, for instance, in keeping with GOST 22761-77 and GOST 18661-73.
The rate of forecasting the drop of ultimate strength can be found from the following equation:
| (2) |
where s
TO is the initial ultimate strength;
s
Ti is the ultimate strength at the time of measurement ti;
t
is the time interval between the measurements.
During determination of the dynamics of the geometrical dimensions change, let us calculate the rate of change Vs of the structure wall thickness as follows:
| (3) |
where S0 is the initial wall thickness;
Si is the wall thickness at the time of measurement ti;
t
is the time interval between the measurements.
Defects of the type of cracks of metallic surfaces are determined using such non-destructive testing as ultrasonic, magnetic, eddy current and electrical potential methods. In addition to crack detection, its dimensions, including the depth of location, can be determined.
In a number of cases in mechanical testing it is beneficial to apply the acoustic emission method, which permits determination of fatigue fractures and stress corrosion cracking. In bimetal items under loads not exceeding 30% of the breaking load, it is possible to identify poor joints by the emission caused by the start of breaking up of the bond between the layers.
Let us consider forecasting the residual life of the structure for the case of the service life of a gas pipeline after its prolonged service. In keeping with the accepted codes the residual life of a structure can be calculated as follows:
| (4) |
where Vs is the rate of metal degradation (2);
s0 is the value of ultimate strength of the pipe metal in keeping with the certificate;
K1 is the material-dependent coefficient of reliability;
KH is the coefficient of reliability of the pipeline determined by its purpose;
m is the coefficient of pipeline operational conditions;
P is the working pressure of gas in the pipeline, MPa;
D3 is the outer diameter of the pipe, mm;
n is the coefficient of reliability determined by internal working pressure;
Slim is the limit admissible thickness of the pipeline wall specified in the codes;
t
0 is the length of pipeline service.
The derived value of pipeline residual life is verified proceeding from the limit admissible value Sl, i.e.
| (5) |
| © AIPnD , created by NDT.net | |Home| |Top| |