![]() ·Table of Contents ·Aeronautics and Aerospace | Development and Application of a Software for Studying the Interaction of Sound Pulse with Defects and Checking the Performance of Signal Analysis ToolsVK Ravindran and BC BhaumikQuality Division Propellants and Chemicals,Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre Thiruvananthapuram-695022 Kerala State India Contact |
In order make these interpretations accurate and effective, a thorough understanding of the sound pulse generated by the particular transducer used for inspection and its interaction with defects under various conditions is required. Also, for effective usage of computer based signal analysis, tools involved are essentially to be checked for their performance. These performance checks are done by fabricating various known defects to suit the objective. However, in most situations it becomes difficult or impossible to realise all these physical conditions through fabrication activities. Computer simulation can be utilised to fill some of these gaps.
| A[ i ] = Ao Cos ( 2 P i f p / fs + f) ------------------ (1) |
| A[ i ] : Cosine wave in digital form stored in an array. |
| Ao : Amplitude of Cosine wave. |
| i : Sample number (0, 1, 2 ............... N). N : Maximum number of samples. |
| f p : Frequency of Cosine wave. |
| fs   : Sampling Rate of the digitizer. |
| f :Phase shift in radians. |
Ar[ i ] = A1[ i ] + A2[ i ] ---------------------------(2). |
| Ar[ i ] : Resultant Cosine Wave in digital form stored in an array. |
| A1[ i ] : First Cosine Wave in digital form stored in an array. |
| A2[ i ] : Second Cosine Wave in digital form stored in an array. |
Example (1)
It can be seen from the Table 1 that the highest positive and negative amplitudes measured by the Analysis software used match with those of the standard signal generated by the presently developed simulation software. The small deviation seen in the measured value is not a measurement error. It is due to sampling of the continuous wave to form a digital signal. It is seen during the course of experimentation with different sampling rates that for low sampling rates of the order of below five times the Cosine wave frequency this deviation is more. If the value of the measured peak frequency is compared for serial numbers 1 & 2 in the Table 1, it can be seen that accuracy improves with the size of the window. The column number 5 reveals that the frequency scale is linear up to 16 MHz
| Sl.no | Features of the Signals Generated using Equation - 1 | Corresponding Features Extracted by Signal Analysis Software under performance evaluation. | Window size selected for Analysis (samples) | ||||||||
| Amplitude | 1 * | 2* | 3* | 4* | Amplitude | 5* | 6* | ||||
| +ve | -ve | +ve | -Ve | ||||||||
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 1.01 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 2 | 100 | 100 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 1.00 | 49.8 | 1-500 |
| 3 | 100 | 100 | 0.5 | 20 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 0.50 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 4 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 200 | 0 | 300 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 8.09 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 5 | 100 | 100 | 16 | 200 | 0 | 300 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 16.1 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| Table 2: Results of Performance Check by Analysing Signals Simulated by Software | |||||||||||
Example (2)
Signal Analysis software systems generally contain various displays in the frequency mode. Resolution of frequency scale at various sampling rates, expansion of frequency scale etc. may vary. Using the known simulated standard signals an assessment of the performance is made in the fig. 6 as an example.
Example (3)
It can be seen from comparison of column 1 & 5 of Table 2 that the analysis software shows error in frequency reading when sampling rate increases. Likewise it has been seen that certain analysis software systems fail in some other parameter under certain conditions.
| Sl.no | Features of the Signals Generated using Equation - 1 | Corresponding Features Extracted by Signal Analysis Software under performance evaluation. | Window size selected for Analysis (samples) | ||||||||
| Amplitude | 1 * | 2* | 3* | 4* | Amplitude | 5* | 6* | ||||
| +ve | -ve | +ve | -Ve | ||||||||
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 2 | 200 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 3.03 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 2 | 100 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 2.60 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 3 | 100 | 100 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 500 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 2.20 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 4 | 100 | 100 | 12 | 200 | 0 | 300 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 13.2 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| 5 | 100 | 100 | 16 | 200 | 0 | 300 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 17.1 | 49.9 | 100-300 |
| Table 2: Results of Performance Check by Analysing Signals Simulated by Software | |||||||||||
Pr(i) = P(i) + P(i+d1) + P(i+d2) + P(i+d3) + P(i+d4) -------------(3)
P(i) = digital array of pulse reflected from small reflector(see fig 5a). i = 0 to pulse width in steps of sampling rate. d1,d2,d3,d4 = delay in arrival time of reflected pulses from small constituent reflectors(see fig.5). P(i+d1) , P(i+d2), P(i+d3), P(i+d4) = digital array of delayed reflected pulses. Pr(i) = resultant signal pulse array.
In this case(fig.5b) d1=d4. In fig.5c two reflectors are shown corresponding to reflectors 1 & 2 of fig 5.b. In general case for simulation activities the shape of the small reflector need not be rectangular. Experimental validation of fig.5c is done in fig 8d of example (4). Experimental validation of a case similar to that in fig.5b is shown in fig.4 of example(6).
Once the digital resultant signal array is obtained the analogue display is created using suitable display algorithm. Software makes use of this methodology to simulate different defect conditions. Some useful applications are detailed below.
Example (4)
Side Drilled Holes(SDH) are made on Graphite Blocks(see fig. 8). These SDHs are made to study the interaction of sound pulses reflected from 2 SDHs closely separated in this material. The resultant A-Scan (RF) signals obtained by inspection using 1MHz probe(B1SN) are given in fig. 1. The collected signals revealed that when the defects are closer of the order of pulse width or less the pulses interfere according to the principle of superposition. For the defects as close as of the order of 1mm or less(c & d in fig. 8) the signal conditions widely differ( c & d in fig. 1). The exact distances between the fabricated defects are not measurable in this case because of facility constraints and the SDHs are 20 mm deep inside the material.
Similar conditions were simulated very easily with different separations of the defects using the developed software system. The resultant signals are given in the figs. 2 b,c,d. These defect conditions are created from signal in fig.1a. by moving the defects 1 and 2 closer using the developed software. From the resultant signals so obtained and their correlation with that obtained from the SDHs in graphite samples fabricated, it is clear that computer simulation can be utilised to gather more information for interpreter.
Defects in fig. 8a are well separated(8mm in the direction of the sound path) and hence no interference(see fig.1a) . Defects in fig.8b are separated by a distance of the order of 3 mm(in the direction of the sound path) which is of the order of pulse width and hence the two pulses started to interfere(see figs. 1b & 2b ) .Defects in fig.8 (c & d) are still closer and hence merge into one. But slight path difference between the pulses reaching the probe changes the conditions of interference and result in drastic change in the resultant signal amplitude. In an unknown case the reason for this change in amplitude is not obtainable using conventional instrumentation and the interpreter's measurement of the resultant size of the defects is turns out to be wrong. To know more about the nature of interference the frequency mode of these signals were extracted and displayed in figs.3. From this spectral display it can be seen that the resultant signal shown in fig.1c of defect in fig.8c is affected by destructive interference of some frequencies to result in reduction in the resultant signal amplitude. These sort of simulation and experiment enhances the correctness of interpretation of unknown results.
Example (5)
During the conventional application of Ultrasonic NDE , the resolving ability of the transducer is checked using the calibration block as shown in fig.7. This is like "Go - No Go gage" and is applicable for only normal beam. Further understanding is not possible. In this area simulation can be done by the presently developed software to measure the resolvability of different transducers in applicable material. It can be used for angle beam inspection probes too. The only input required is the digital A-Scan signal using the probe under evaluation in the material at the required material distance. This application is shown in fig.7.
Example (6)
Application for simulating signal pulse of defects having different sizes is verified in this example. Side Drilled Holes of different lengths has been made on Graphite and compared with simulation.(see fig.4). In this example , the basic signal used for simulation is the smallest SDH.
| © AIPnD , created by NDT.net | |Home| |Top| |