[ Forum ] [ Technical Discussions ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ]

Re: why TOFD cursor is parabola?

Posted by: Nigel Profile (PID_728), E-mail: ndtservice@yahoo.com, on November 30, 2006 at 09:00 :

In Reply to: Re: why TOFD cursor is parabola? posted by : John , E-mail: jiangyunxi@leepipe.com, on November 30, 2006 at 04:03 :

I have very much appreciated the Platonic dialogue between Yun Xi and Ed G on aspects of phased array. I would not intervene but Ed's last post has a broken link as of my attempt to access it.

So can I (without deep knowledge of the subject) supposition that the wedges will have been machined so that the incident angle of the L-wave from the transducer was approximately 30 degrees (to generate a 45 degree shear-wave in steel). But a focal law of the phased array probe could be constructed to generate a suitable range of angles in the wedge to produce L-waves in the test material. Thus if the PA probe produced a 16 degree beam in the shearwave wedge this would give a 45 degree L-wave in steel. Assuming similar acoustic velocities between the phased-array wedge and the attached "shear-wave" wedge would mean more sound transmission than refraction or reflection at the intrface. Thus the experienced PA focal-law designer would be able to stipulate which incident angles to generate to produce the suitable L-waves in the test material.

Hopefully Ed will return or other experienced people will write to either confirm or refute my supposition and perhaps add some other information.

Thanks guys.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP
Link Title: is important! Information on my Home Page
Optional Image URL: http://www....gif


Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process


[ Forum ] [ Technical Discussions ] [ Help ]