[ Forum ] [ Technical Discussions ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ]
Re: why TOFD cursor is parabola?
Posted by: Nigel(PID_728), E-mail: ndtservice@yahoo.com, on November 30, 2006 at 09:00 :
In Reply to: Re: why TOFD cursor is parabola? posted by : John , E-mail: jiangyunxi@leepipe.com, on November 30, 2006 at 04:03 :
I have very much appreciated the Platonic dialogue between Yun Xi and Ed G on aspects of phased array. I would not intervene but Ed's last post has a broken link as of my attempt to access it.
So can I (without deep knowledge of the subject) supposition that the wedges will have been machined so that the incident angle of the L-wave from the transducer was approximately 30 degrees (to generate a 45 degree shear-wave in steel). But a focal law of the phased array probe could be constructed to generate a suitable range of angles in the wedge to produce L-waves in the test material. Thus if the PA probe produced a 16 degree beam in the shearwave wedge this would give a 45 degree L-wave in steel. Assuming similar acoustic velocities between the phased-array wedge and the attached "shear-wave" wedge would mean more sound transmission than refraction or reflection at the intrface. Thus the experienced PA focal-law designer would be able to stipulate which incident angles to generate to produce the suitable L-waves in the test material.
Hopefully Ed will return or other experienced people will write to either confirm or refute my supposition and perhaps add some other information.
Thanks guys.
- Re: why TOFD cursor is parabola? Ed Ginzel
![]()
![]()
Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process
[ Forum ] [ Technical Discussions ] [ Help ]