Forum Technical Discussions Re: hydrophilic remover Posted by: theo micottis , E-mail: Address, on May 09, 2008 at 18:55 : In Reply to: hydrophilic remover posted by : diego on May 09, 2008 at 18:05: Hi Diego, I think hydrophilic remover is less hazardous than lipophilic remover.Its remover action is not diluition, it contains surface-active agents so it works by interface contact.The application time is less critical because it removes only excess of penetrant, it doesn't seep into the crack.The washable penetrant will be only excess of penetrant. YOURS SINCERELY Follow Ups: Re: hydrophilic remover DJ Kallhof 16:25 May-10-2008 (1) Re: hydrophilic remover diego 16:31 May-30-2008 (0) Post a Followup: Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: ----------- Start Original Message ----------- : Hi Diego, I think hydrophilic remover is less hazardous than lipophilic remover.Its remover action is not diluition, it contains surface-active agents so it works by interface contact.The application time is less critical because it removes only excess of penetrant, it doesn't seep into the crack.The washable penetrant will be only excess of penetrant. : YOURS SINCERELY ------------ End Original Message ------------ Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP Page Title: is important! Optional Image URL: http://www....gif Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process Forum Technical Discussions Help