Home Forum Technical Discussions

Re: hydrophilic remover

Posted by: DJ Kallhof Profile (PID_1317), E-mail: Address, on May 10, 2008 at 16:25 :

In Reply to: Re: hydrophilic remover posted by : theo micottis , E-mail: Address, on May 09, 2008 at 18:55 :

Emulsification time for a specific piece must be established by experimentation. If emulsification time is excessive, penetrant WILL be removed from flaws, making detection impossible. These are excerps from the Metals Handbook, ninth edition. I would suggest, anyone who feels emulsification time is anything less then the most critical time in the post emulsified inspection process, go back to the books. Have a nice day.
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Hi Diego, I think hydrophilic remover is less hazardous than lipophilic remover.Its remover action is not diluition, it contains surface-active agents so it works by interface contact.The application time is less critical because it removes only excess of penetrant, it doesn't seep into the crack.The washable penetrant will be only excess of penetrant.
: YOURS SINCERELY
------------ End Original Message ------------




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP
Page Title: is important!
Optional Image URL:
http://www....gif


Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process


Forum Technical Discussions Help