Forum Technical Discussions      Interpretation of 2235-9 maximum permissible flaw size Posted by: Nigel Armstrong (PID_728), E-mail: Address, on September 03, 2008 at 16:30 : Respected colleagues, out of interest, what is the basis for the values used in the Code Case for Table 2, a/t, (columns 2 to 4) for surface and sub-surface defects required as a prelude to determining the maximum permissible flaw length vs height? What value should be utilised in the case of a subsurface defect of say 4,8mm height. Fig 1(c) annotates this dimension as 2a. Does that mean that for subsurface flaws only half the flaw height i.e. 2,4mm, should be utilised in calculating a/t and a/l? Lastly can anybody provide a clear and simple explanation of Figs 2 thru 5 (flaw interaction). Please if you have the answer, or an opinion, on any of these questions I woulod be grateful to hear from you. Follow Ups: Re: Interpretation of 2235-9 maximum permissible flaw size Massimo 16:44 Sep-07-2008 (9) Re: Interpretation of 2235-9 maximum permissible flaw size Ed Ginzel 20:18 Sep-07-2008 (8) Re: Interpretation of 2235-9 maximum permissible flaw size Ed T. 02:02 Sep-08-2008 (7) Куплю Windows, Office ssoofftt 15:54 Oct-27-2008 (0) Drive Your Car OnTap Water! agobbycoamp 19:29 Oct-22-2008 (0) Куплю Windows XP softishka 21:18 Oct-13-2008 (0) Установка спутниковых и эфирных антенн в Москве и Подмосковье sputnnyk 22:00 Oct-11-2008 (0) Куплю Windows winrembo 18:16 Oct-06-2008 (0) Hello.. Let's get acquainted... tonsapopymn 03:19 Oct-06-2008 (0) Re: Interpretation of 2235-9 maximum permissible flaw size Bill Blanshan 02:15 Sep-08-2008 (0) Post a Followup: Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: ----------- Start Original Message ----------- : Respected colleagues, : out of interest, what is the basis for the values used in the Code Case for Table 2, a/t, (columns 2 to 4) for surface and sub-surface defects required as a prelude to determining the maximum permissible flaw length vs height? : What value should be utilised in the case of a subsurface defect of say 4,8mm height. Fig 1(c) annotates this dimension as 2a. Does that mean that for subsurface flaws only half the flaw height i.e. 2,4mm, should be utilised in calculating a/t and a/l? : Lastly can anybody provide a clear and simple explanation of Figs 2 thru 5 (flaw interaction). : Please if you have the answer, or an opinion, on any of these questions I woulod be grateful to hear from you. ------------ End Original Message ------------ Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP Page Title: is important! Optional Image URL: http://www....gif Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process Forum Technical Discussions Help