[ NDT-net Forum ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Help ]

---

Re: Double wall double image

Posted by: Nick Welland , E-mail: wellandn@tenix.com, on May 12, 2000 at 12:11 :

In Reply to: Re: Double wall double image posted by : Jacques Parent on May 11, 2000 at 14:51:

: M. Welland;

: I know what you are saying and I do not disagree.
: But:
: 1) 0, 120, 240 shooting on small diameter (<100mm) does not ensure complete coverage on the film side. One still need to evaluate the source side image.

: 2) Source side IQI's (as required by Code) ensure equivalent and acceptable sensitivity.

: In my opinion both techniques are acceptable and the choice should be left to the "shooter"

: Regards
: jp

OK Jacques, c'est entendu, either technique is acceptable. I was trying to see whether there would in fact be any justification for preferring 0-120-240.

Regards
Nick Welland

---

Follow Ups:

---

Post a Followup:

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:

Comments:
: : M. Welland; : : I know what you are saying and I do not disagree. : : But: : : 1) 0, 120, 240 shooting on small diameter (<100mm) does not ensure complete coverage on the film side. One still need to evaluate the source side image. : : 2) Source side IQI's (as required by Code) ensure equivalent and acceptable sensitivity. : : In my opinion both techniques are acceptable and the choice should be left to the "shooter" : : Regards : : jp : OK Jacques, c'est entendu, either technique is acceptable. I was trying to see whether there would in fact be any justification for preferring 0-120-240. : Regards : Nick Welland

Optional Link URL:	Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP
Link Title: is important!	Information on my Home Page
Optional Image URL:	http://www....gif

Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process

---

[ NDT-net Forum ] [ Help ]