Forum Technical Discussions      Re: ASTM A578 Posted by: Theo Micottis , E-mail: Address, on November 24, 2008 at 22:27 : In Reply to: Re: ASTM A578 posted by : Nigel Armstrong , E-mail: Address, on November 24, 2008 at 18:17 : Thank you very much Nigel. In reality this was my task in the exam for the third level UT. They gave me this standard for the unbond test and I really didn't think they gave me a wrong specification or at least with some deviations.I read S7.1 and I was quite sure of my choice. Well I failed my exam it will be better next time.You have been very useful. Thank you very much THEO Follow Ups: Re: ASTM A578 S.V.Swamy 10:21 Nov-25-2008 (2) Re: ASTM A578 Theo Micottis 19:22 Nov-25-2008 (0) Re: ASTM A578 Michel Couture 17:54 Nov-25-2008 (0) Post a Followup: Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: ----------- Start Original Message ----------- : Thank you very much Nigel. In reality this was my task in the exam for the third level UT. They gave me this standard for the unbond test and I really didn't think they gave me a wrong specification or at least with some deviations.I read S7.1 and I was quite sure of my choice. Well I failed my exam it will be better next time.You have been very useful. : Thank you very much : THEO ------------ End Original Message ------------ Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ndt.net/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP Page Title: is important! Optional Image URL: http://www....gif Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process Forum Technical Discussions Help