![]()
Forum
Technical Discussions
Re: k factor
Posted by: S.V.Swamy(PID_839), E-mail: Address, on December 17, 2008 at 07:45 :
In Reply to: Re: k factor posted by : Udo Schlengermann
, E-mail: Address, on December 16, 2008 at 12:06 :
Sir,
You wrote:
As everything has been said by my former collegues, I take the chance to wish everyboby
: a Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year.
: Best regards
: Udo Schlengermann
: Chairman ISO/TC135/SC3 (UT)
: Chairman CEN/TC138/WG2 (UT)I too take this opportunity to wish you a happy new year. I tried to mail you separately but the mail was rejected.
With best wishes,
Swamy
Hyderabad, India
ndtguru@gmail.com----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Reply:
: Hello Ed, Jim and Neil,
: the explanations for the derivation of the k factor of sound beam divergence are correct.
: The pulse-echo technique has to take into account the characteristics of both the transmitting and the receiving transducer.
: With equal transducers and with the logarithmic decibel-notation it simply means half the dB-drop as for free radiation.
: For circular sources Bessels function J1(x)/x has to be used.
: For rectangular sources it is the function sin(x)/x for one direction and sin(y)/y for the perpendicular direction.
: Unfortunately neither Krautkramer's blue pocket book nor Krautkramer's red book on ultrasonic materials testing are available anymore.
: As everything has been said by my former collegues, I take the chance to wish everyboby
: a Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year.
: Best regards
: Udo Schlengermann
: Chairman ISO/TC135/SC3 (UT)
: Chairman CEN/TC138/WG2 (UT)
Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process
Forum
Technical Discussions
Help