![]()
Forum
Technical Discussions
Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look!
Posted by: Nigel Armstrong(PID_728), E-mail: Address, on January 05, 2009 at 14:36 :
In Reply to: Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look! posted by : TJ
, E-mail: Address, on January 05, 2009 at 12:29 :
Happy and healthy New Year to all NDT.netters.
Thanks for the links to sites showing these phenomena Ed - I've not yet explored them but I shall.
Intuitively, I had grasped the contrast problem, never really taught at NDT school though. Viewers with in-built adjustable masks are very useful for this. I assume that these effects may lead predominantly to assuming a linear indication exists, in which case the RI tech often calls in a trusted UT tech to see if a reflector exists in the area of concern. Is this a reasonable action or a display of lack-of-confidence on the part of the RI tech?
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Ed,
: After reading the .pdf I now see how this is an issue. The mach bands are of particular interest. I am surprised this was never touched on in training. It will be from now on!
: Thanks,
: TJ
------------ End Original Message ------------
- Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look! chris s
18:06 Jan-06-2009 (0)
- Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look! chris s
18:06 Jan-06-2009 (0)
- Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look! Ed Ginzel
![]()
18:00 Jan-05-2009 (1)
- Re: Aggressive Radiographic Auditors Need to Take a Closer Look! Dent McIntyre
15:27 Jan-06-2009 (0)
Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process
Forum
Technical Discussions
Help