![]()
Forum
General Discussions
Re: Pressure Vessels
Posted by: Nigel Armstrong(PID_728), E-mail: Address, on November 13, 2008 at 17:14 :
In Reply to: Pressure Vessels posted by : Filipe Matta
, E-mail: Address, on November 10, 2008 at 17:27 :
Filipe
Hopefully when reaching the decision to bury the vessel the engineers will have taken into account the difficulty of periodic inspection. Perhaps considering its construction, service conditions, corrosion potential a reasoned engineering decision was arrived at that it would not require periodic inspection. Then again maybe they just had a hole dug and dropped it in!!!
Cheers
Nigel
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Thank´s everybody for your your help on EMAT.
: i think Joe's right: the "convencional" way is better because it's well accepted and code approved.
: Is there a reliable NDT to inspect a buried pressure vessel without unbury it?
: tks for your help on this matter.
: Filipe Matta
------------ End Original Message ------------
- Re: Pressure Vessels forexsystemprofi
16:06 Nov-26-2008 (1)
- Re: Pressure Vessels Nigel Armstrong
16:47 Nov-26-2008 (0)
Attention! Please click the button only once. This may take a moment to process
Forum
General Discussions
Help