[ Ultrasonic Transducer Workshop ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Help ]

Correction Re: Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers

Posted by: A. Anev , E-mail: anevaa@hotmail.com, on September 27, 1996 at 16:41:55:

In Reply to: Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers posted by : A. Anev on September 26, 1996 at 16:45:28:

: What is the difference in the accuracy of dry-coupled, air coupled and EMAT transducers generally and regarding near surface and internal imperfections?
: Suppose all the transducers work at the accuracy at which they give the best results.

I'm sorry. I wanted to say : Suppose all the transducers work at the FREQUENCY (not accuracy) at which they give the best results.

: Furthermore do you think polymer transducers can be used as dry-coupled ones?



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL: Example: "http://www....html". Alternative write "http://www.ultrasonic.de/wshop/attach/filename.htm" if you transfered a filename.htm via FTP
Link Title: is important! Information on my Home Page
Optional Image URL: http://www....gif


[ Ultrasonic Transducer Workshop ] [ Help ]