[ Ultrasonic Transducer Workshop ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Help ]
Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general.
Posted by: R.Died , E-mail: rd@ultrasonic.de, on September 06, 1996 at 23:31:52:For an applied frequency of 0.5 MHz what will be the smallest flaw
that air coupled ultrasound could find?Furthermore I want to enter into a general discussion about smallest detectable flaw sizes.
Is there a certain relation between flaw size and frequency?- lambda/flaw dia ratio?
- Is this relation linear?
Preconditions: ideal reflection (shape and impedance).
Rolf Diederichs
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Bill Grandia 00:32:42 9/08/96 (size: 824) (6)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Robert A. Day 23:37:40 9/11/96 (size: 4645) (5)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Bill Grandia 23:47:01 9/14/96 (size: 9685)
(0)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Rolf D. 10:24:22 9/12/96 (size: 1138)
(2)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Yosi Bar-Cohen 09:40:40 9/19/96 (size: 1880) (0)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. Bill Grandia 00:01:18 9/15/96 (size: 10660)
(0)
- Re: Smallest detectable flaw size, especially for low frequency test (f= 0.5 MHz) and in general. W. Grandia 02:17:45 9/12/96 (size: 5424) (0)