|NDT.net June 2006 Vol. 11 No.6|
Nondestructive Testing of Meat Using Planar ElectroMagnetic SensorsS. C. Mukhopadhyay and C. P. Gooneratne,
Institute of Information Sciences and Technology
College of Sciences
Massey University (Turitea)
Palmerston North, New Zealand
AbstractThe paper has described the possibility of testing meat in a non-destructive and non-invasive way using planar electromagnetic sensors. The planar electromagnetic sensor of interdigital type is quite sensitive to the fat content of meat samples. The feasibility of developing a low cost instrumentation system for estimation of fat content in a nondestructive way has been explored.
Keywords: Nondestructive testing (NDT), non-invasive inspection, planar electromagnetic sensors, interdigital type, impedance, meat inspection, fat content.
1 IntroductionThe purpose of this research activity is to explore the possibility of using planar type electromagnetic sensors for testing quality of meat especially the fat content in meat samples in a nondestructive way. Earlier research using planar magnetic sensors has demonstrated the detection of defects in the printed circuit board and the estimation of near-surface material properties of conducting and magnetic materials. This sensing technique has the potential to be used for the quality inspection of milk products such as milk, butter, cheese, curds, yogurts etc. This sensing technique is based on a planar electromagnetic sensor operating with radiofrequency excitation and the computer-aided computation being fast allows the on-line monitoring of quality. The on-line sensing system suitable for the dairy industry needs to possess several key qualities including cost effectiveness, high reliability both in terms of measurement accuracy and speed of measurement. Also the sensor technology has to be able to perform volumetric penetrative measurement in order to measure properties through out the product and this could be achieved by employing a planar type electromagnetic sensing technique. In this research planar electromagnetic sensors have been investigated for the nondestructive and non-invasive determination of fat content of meat samples especially pork belly cuts and some results of initial investigations are reported in this paper. The development of a planar-electromagnetic-sensors-based inspection system can be an alternative to chemically destructive methods.
2 Planar Electromagnetic SensorsThe research and development works using planar electromagnetic sensors have started quite some time back. The works employing planar meander type sensors started quite a few years back with the target of developing a complete inspection system of the printed circuit board (pcb) for pentium pr°Cessors . The exciting coil is of meander configuration as shown in figure 1 whereas the sensing coil is either of a mesh type or a figure-of-eight type configuration. The pcb of pentium pr°Cessor having many long conductors, the meander configured exciting coil is a suitable choice. The planar meander type sensor has also been used for the inspection of material defects such as the existence of inner layer cracks and for the estimation of fatigue of metal products [2, 3, 4, 5]. A crack with alignment in parallel with the exciting meander coil is difficult to be detected by the meander configuration. The alternative is to employ mesh type sensors as shown in figure 2 [6, 7, 8, 9]. The response of both the meander and mesh type planar electromagnetic sensors to dielectric materials is moderate at relatively low frequency of excitation. In order to increase the sensitivity of the sensor system another type of sensor, the interdigital one as shown in figure 3 has been fabricated and developed. Planar interdigital type sensors have been used for many different applications; planar interdigitated array electrodes have been used for the determination of components contained in aqueous solutions , determination of moisture, fiber and titanium dioxide in paper pulp [11, 12, 13], for the complex permittivity characterization of materials  and the detection of small amount of magnetic beads over the surface of microsensors .
Both the meander and mesh type sensors consist of two coils: one used for excitation to generate electromagnetic field and another for sensing. The high frequency alternating supply is provided to the exciting coil and the voltage across the sensing coil is measured. The transfer impedance (the ratio of the sensing voltage to the exciting current) is used as the characterization parameter for the meander and mesh type sensors. In case of interdigital sensor the exciting voltage and the displacement current through the sensor is measured. The impedance (the ratio of the applied voltage to the current) is the characterization parameter used for the interdigital sensor. To have a knowledge of the impedance characteristics the impedances have been measured experimentally. The experimental set-up is shown in figure 4.
Different sizes of sensors of each meander, mesh and interdigital types have been experimented using the experimental set-up. The sensor has been supplied from a controlled frequency supply, the voltage across and the current through the sensor are recorded. The frequency of excitation has been varied between 100 kHz to 80 MHz. The impedance characteristics of the sensors are shown in figures 5, 6 and 7 respectively. It is seen that the transfer impedance for both meander and mesh type increases with the increase in frequency whereas the impedance of interdigital type sensor decreases with frequency. With the same effective area the response of mesh type sensors is better than meander type. Basically meander and mesh types sensors are inductive types whereas the interdigital one is a capacitive type. It is also seen that both meander and mesh type sensors respond well at high frequency whereas the response of the interdigital sensor is very good at low frequency and doesn’t respond well at high frequency. The choice of operating frequency must be carefully selected.
3 Initial Investigation with Planar Interdigital SensorSince the response of the planar meander and mesh type sensors with dielectric material such as pork meat is not good at all, planar interdigital sensor has been used for the experiment. A planar inter-digital sensor (40mm׳40mm) as shown in figure 3 has been used to conduct experiment with different types of pork using the experimental set-up as shown in figure 4. There were mainly four main varieties
Each piece was tested separately, and the sensor was placed as close as possible to the meat for all experiments except experiment 1. In experiment 1 glad-wrap was placed on top of the meat, and the sensor lightly touched the top of the meat. During the last experiment (exp 4) the skin was put on top of a piece of fat, mixed and muscle. With the exception of experiment 1, the sensor had no direct contact with the meat, during all other experiments.
The inter-digital sensor was tested with a series resistor across which the voltage is measured
to get the current signal. The operating frequency was set at 500 KHz. The impedance was
then calculated as shown below.
Voltage across the exciting coil = V1
A few experimental results are shown here. Figure 9 shows a typical signals obtained. The signal 1 corresponds to the applied input voltage and signal 2 corresponds to voltage obtained across the series resistor.
The impedance is calculated for all experiments and the variation of impedance of the sensor with different conditions are shown in figure 10 corresponding to experiment 2.
An initial measurement is obtained for the sensor with no materials under it, before each of the four experiments. In figure 10 this measurement is shown as “Air”. Looking closely at figure 10 it is seen that the impedance of the sensor is different for different samples. This shows that the sensor can detect different types of pork. This is due to different effective permittivity of different pork meats.
The sensor used in the experiment is not the optimum one required for the best result. But observing the results it can be concluded that the planar interdigital sensor is sensitive to pork meat and has the potential to be used for the estimation of fat content in pork meat. More experiments are required to determine the actual nature of the influence of fat on sensor characteristics.
4 2nd Set of ExperimentBased on the above observation it has been realized that the planar electromagnetic sensor of interdigital configuration has the potential to determine the fat content of pork belly cuts. In the initial investigation the size of the sensor was not sufficient to cover the complete piece of meat. In practice the bellies are cut into particular sizes and the possibility of testing them by doing experiment only one are preferred. To explore that possibilities three new sensors of different pitch sizes have been fabricated keeping the covered area almost equal, the details are given in Table 1. They were tested on six pork belly pieces, A1, B1, C1, A2, B2, and C2. the bellies were around 20 mm – 30 mm deep with skin on and were placed on top of each sensor to simulate the factory situation. The pieces of pork bellies were placed on the sensor according to four different orientations as explained below with respect to figure 11.
Orientation 1 = [skin side up, label at front] – as shown in figure 11.
The sensors were driven by a 10 V Sine wave. The measurements were made at frequencies in the range from 5 KHz to 1 MHz. The pork belly pieces had skin on top and muscle at the bottom, where the personal view of top and bottom is contradictory. The sensors were rested on a table with an insulating mat underneath, with the electrodes facing up. Glad wrap was placed on top of the sensor to prevent direct contact with the pork. This is done to keep up the high standards of hygiene required when testing meat. Each of the six pieces of pork was tested for all four orientations at the same frequency range. The driving signal for the sensors were provided by the Agilent 33120A waveform generator and the Agilent 54622D mixed signal oscilloscope, analyzed the input voltage, output current and the phase. All efforts were made to make sure the pork pieces were all tested at similar temperatures, varying between 16-18°C.
A few results are reported here. Since different pork belly samples may have different effective permittivity, the imaginary component of impedance will be mainly affected. Figure 12 shows the variation of reactive part of impedance of sensors #1 as a function of frequency for all six samples of pork belly for the orientation#1. It is seen that there is a distinct difference in the magnitude of impedance in the frequency range 5 kHz to 40 kHz. With an increase in frequency the difference in magnitude between samples decreases.
Figures 13 and 14 show the variation in reactive impedance for sensors #2 and #3, respectively, as a function of frequency for the same orientation#1. It can be seen that the results obtained for sensors#2 and #3 are quite different from that obtained for sensor#1. Figures 15, 16 and 17 show the reactive impedance as a function of frequency for all three sensors for orientation #3. Even though the results are quite distinct for all six samples, the results obtained corresponding to orientation#1 are quite different to orientation #3. This is due to the fact that the response of the sensors depend on its penetration depth. If the thickness of pork belly is larger than the penetration depth of field lines, the sensors may not be able to respond to fat if the fat lies on the top surface of the meat piece. The impedance of the sensors provides an average indication of the fat to the depth of penetration and the part of the meat within the electric field.
In practice, measurement for one frequency or at only a few frequencies are required. Figure 18 shows the reactive impedance values of different samples at an operating frequency of 5 kHz corresponding to orientation #1. It is seen that the impedance values are quite distinct from each other, the sample A1 has got the highest impedance and the sample A2 has the lowest impedance. The measurement at 5 kHz provides the opportunity of development of a low cost instrumentation and measurement system based on a Cygnal C8051F020 microcontroller.
The key question is whether the reactive impedance values shown in figure 18 have a relationship with the fat content of the pork belly. To compare the performance of the sensors 3 test samples were analysed by Soxhlet extraction of an homogenized sample (including the skin) using petroleum ether (Bp 40 – 60°C) and the results are shown in Table 2. The maximum fat content is for the sample A1 which is obtained from the results corresponding to sensor #1. From figure 18 it is seen that the average fat content of B2 is slightly higher than A2. From the results obtained from the sensors it can be concluded that the planar interdigital sensors has a good potential for the on-line determination of fat content of pork meat.
The mathematical part for the estimation of fat content is described here. The magnitude and
phase of the impedance of the sensor without meat (air) and with meat under test (MUT) are
measured. The reactive impedances are calculated as follows
5 3rd Set of ExperimentA further experiment has been carried using the three sensors on thirteen pork belly samples. The new samples are smaller and more shallow pork belly samples with skin removed so they would correspond more closely to the electric field penetration. Like the earlier experiment the readings were taken for four different orientations. Figures 19 to 21 show the variation of reactive part of the impedance of three different sensors as a function of the frequency for orientation#1. The results are shown upto a maximum operating frequency 30 kHz. With the higher frequency the difference in readings between samples are not noticeable.
Figures 22 to 24 show the variation of reactive part of the impedance of three different sensors as a function of frequency for orientation#3. The results are shown upto a maximum of operating frequency of 30 kHz. With the higher value of operating frequency the difference in readings between samples are not noticeable. The results are slightly different than those obtained for orientation#1.
Figures 25 and 26 show the reactive part of the impedances of sensor#1 corresponding to orientation#1 for thirteen different samples at operating frequencies 5 kHz and 10 kHz, respectively. It can be seen from figures 25 and 26, that the variation between samples for these two frequencies are exactly same. This shows that the results obtained from frequencies as low as 5 kHz provide quite distinctly different results for different samples.
6 Cygnal 8051 Microcontroller-based instrumentation systemFor the analysis it is necessary to collect voltage and current signals, so an efficient data acquisition system is very important. The analog data is captured using an analog-to-digital converter. A SiLab microcontroller C8051F020 was considered initially as shown in figure 27. The SiLab C8051F020 has two ADCs operating at 100 kHz and 500 kHz respectively. So an operating frequency of up to 50 kHz can very well be used using this system. The system is under development and is expected to provide good results.
7 ConclusionsThis paper has described the interaction of planar electromagnetic sensors with samples from pork belly cuts. The sensors of planar interdigital configuration of different pitches have been fabricated and used for experiments. The sensors show quite distinctive results with different pork belly samples. The response of the sensors indicate a good possibility of using this type sensor for the prediction of fat content in pork belly in an non-invasive way. The good response of the sensors at low frequencies suggests that it should be possible to develop a low cost sensing system based on a Cygnal microcontroller C8051F020.