where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

1302 views
Technical Discussions
Deston Henson
NDT Inspector,
Canada, Joined Nov 2009, 20

Deston Henson

NDT Inspector,
Canada,
Joined Nov 2009
20
02:03 Jan-22-2010
Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications

Has anyone heard of &/or used the 'total drop' method of sizing defects / indications ultrasonically? If so, please give me your thoughts.

 
 Reply 
 
J. Mark Davis
Teacher, And Consultant
University of Ultrasonics, Birmingham, Alabama, USA, Joined Mar 2000, 85

J. Mark Davis

Teacher, And Consultant
University of Ultrasonics, Birmingham, Alabama,
USA,
Joined Mar 2000
85
13:43 Jan-22-2010
Re: Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications
In Reply to Deston Henson at 02:03 Jan-22-2010 (Opening).

You did not mention whether this is length sizing or through wall height sizing.

Total Drop is a variation of the 6 and 12 dB drop methods. Total loss of sound pressure is when the signal is peaked and the transducer is moved left and right (length sizing) , or forward or backwards (height sizing) until the signal drops into the noise.

At EPRI back in the 80s it was determined this was the best method for length sizing of IGSCC was the total loss of the signal into the noise.

As for through wall height sizing, experience, and research at the EPRI NDE Center shows that a dB drop sizing method is not very effective. When the flaw is smaller than the beam spread, you tend to size the beam spread and not the flaw. Hence the reason for using Time of Flight methods or Creeping Wave methods for height sizing.

A simple exercise to demonstrate the effects for through wall height sizing error using dB drop is to obtain a block of steel with a variety of notches at 20, 40, 60 and 80 % deep. Using a 6 dB drop or a 12 dB drop method, you will see that all notches end up with the approxiamtely the same through wall height.

For length sizing the 6 and 12 dB drop methods, it works better because generally the flaw length is greater that the beam spread. Total Drop or Total Loss of signal is a conservative method to length size an IGSCC Crack.

One note; Phased Array has solved some of these issues using an angular dB drop methodolgy and focusing for through wall height siizng.

I hope this helps.

Sincerely,

J. Mark Davis
University of Ultrasonics

 
 Reply 
 
Andrew Cunningham
NDT Inspector
Canada, Joined Jun 2008, 239

Andrew Cunningham

NDT Inspector
Canada,
Joined Jun 2008
239
23:25 Jan-26-2010
Re: Total Drop Method of Sizing Indications
In Reply to Deston Henson at 02:03 Jan-22-2010 (Opening).

Hi Deston,
I have been using and demonstrating Total Drop since the late 70s. I have found Total Drop sizing for length the most reliable method of all the many techniques. I would never use it for cross sectional sizing, especially on an ID connected defect ( the corner trap will grossly over size the reflector ). I must emphasize that sizing with just one method, is like scanning with just one probe angle. The more methods you know and USE the less likely you are of miss-sizing. I cannot emphasize enough to practice Max Amp, 6dB,14dB, 20dB and Total Drop on all the reflectors you find. Each type of defect may be better sized with different methods. So its up to you to practice them all and learn what is best for each type of defect. As for cross-sectional sizing, I personally would recommend Max Amp.

Andrew Cunningham.
www.practical-ndt.com

 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

HD-CR 35 NDT Computed Radiography System

Portable high-resolution CR scanner for all radiography applications - weld testing, profile images
...
and aerospace. No matter what type of radiographic testing you are performing, the unique TreFoc Technology of the HD-CR 35 NDT imaging plate scanner always guarantees the highest image quality.
>

On Demand Webinar: Improve the Efficiency and Accuracy of Inspection Scanning

On-demand webinar on scanning technology that helps improve the efficiency and accuracy of ultrasoni
...
c inspections in oil and gas, aerospace, manufacturing and other industrial applications. The webinar features a scanning solution for multiple inspection environments, including flat and curved specimens, magnetic and nonmagnetic surfaces and raster scanning over long distances. View it today.
>

Magnetic X-Ray Pipeline Crawler 6''-60''

Suitable to work in 6''-60''diameter with speed of up to 18m/min, Max. moving diatance 5 kilometer
...
s and provide the efficient inspection of the pipeline.
>

ISAFE3 Intrinsically Safe Sensor System

ISAFE3 intrinsically safe sensor system of Vallen Systeme is especially targeted at the petrochemica
...
l - as well as oil and gas transportation industry. The sensor system is designed for permanent monitoring or periodic inspection tasks. Sensors are available for different AE-frequency ranges optimized for corrosion and fatigue crack detection and other applications. The ISAFE 3 sensor system consists of an AE-sensor (model ISAS3) certified according to ATEX/IEC for installation in zone 0, gas group IIC, IP68, 20 to +60 °C, and a signal isolator (model SISO3) certified for installation in zone 2. An ISAS3 sensor can be mounted in atmosphere or submerged, e.g. in water or crude oil. It is supported by mounting tools for temporary (magnets) or permanent (welded) installation. ISAFE3 supports automatic sensor coupling test and can be used with any AE signal processor supporting 28V supply at 90 mA peak, e.g. Vallen Systeme ASIP-2/A.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window