where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

ZETEC, Inc.
Zetec is a global leader in nondestructive testing (NDT) solutions for the critical inspection needs of industries the world counts on every day, ...
1476 views
Technical Discussions
Chirag
India, Joined Aug 2015, 16

Chirag

India,
Joined Aug 2015
16
13:53 Oct-19-2015
Back wall echo higher than front wall echo

Hi,

I was just trying out a few things with the olympus phased array scan. I was testing CFRP laminates and noticed that in most of the laminates the back wall echo is higher than the front wall echo. is this possible? And the distance between the front wall and back wall echo should give me the thickness (i think) but i have noticed an offset of around 1.5 mm. can anyone let me know why?

Thanks and Regards
Chirag

2
 
 Reply 
 
Tom Nelligan
Engineering,
retired, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 390

Tom Nelligan

Engineering,
retired,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
390
15:44 Oct-19-2015
Re: Back wall echo higher than front wall echo
In Reply to Chirag at 13:53 Oct-19-2015 (Opening).

You didn't indicate what probe you are using, but if it includes a straight plastic "wedge" as is usually the case, then what you see with respect to amplitude ratios is normal. Plastic wedges or delay lines represent a fairly close impedance match to typical carbon fiber composites, so there is relatively little reflection from the front surface when well coupled, and if the composite isn't too thick then there is relatively little signal loss across the sound path in the test material. Thus, the backwall echo from an air boundary (with essentially 100% reflection of energy) can easily be larger than the front surface echo from a plastic/composite boundary where there is a close impedance match.

Regarding the apparent thickness measurement error, you haven't provided any information about how you calibrated your instrument, and incorrect velocity/zero calibration is the most common cause of an offset. Other possibilities include significant phase distortion or localized velocity variations in the test material, but those are less likely.

3
 
 Reply 
 
chirag
India, Joined Aug 2015, 16

chirag

India,
Joined Aug 2015
16
15:53 Oct-20-2015
Re: Back wall echo higher than front wall echo
In Reply to Tom Nelligan at 15:44 Oct-19-2015 .

Hi Tom, thanks for your reply.. the probe i used was straight plastic wedge. so in case i didnt use a plastic wedge i would get a higher front wall reflection right?
I dont think the calibration is done for the instrument. I will calibrate and then check if the error comes again.. Thanks again!!

1
 
 Reply 
 
Tom Nelligan
Engineering,
retired, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 390

Tom Nelligan

Engineering,
retired,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
390
16:04 Oct-20-2015
Re: Back wall echo higher than front wall echo
In Reply to chirag at 15:53 Oct-20-2015 .

If you do not use a straight wedge or delay line, you will not see a distinct front surface reflection since it will occur within the excitation pulse ringdown envelope.

2
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

HARDNESS TESTER TKM-459CE combi

TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
...
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.
>

Varex Imaging Large Field of View (FOV) Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs)

A larger FOV DDA can reduce the space and volume of the X-ray inspection system on the factory floor
...
, enable faster scanning times, better throughput and better resolution images at a lower dose. Customers can also save time and money. With these benefits in mind, Varex Imaging has designed a family of large FOV detectors (4343HE, XRD 1611, 4343DX-I, 4343CT) for our industrial imaging customers.
>

A1525 SOLO

A1525 Solo – the most compact and affordable TMF unit with two phased array transducers and 3D v
...
isualization and analysis software in standard delivery set. A compact, ergonomic and easy to handheld Phased Array unit based on Total Focusing Method for easy-going imaging of inspection objects with two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization and evaluation of inspection results.
>

Ultrasonic Testing Immersion Tanks with Unmatched Scanning Features

TecScan’s non-destructive testing Ultrasonic Immersion Tanks & scanners are designed for high pe
...
rformance and demanding NDT testing applications. Our Scan3D™ line of High Precision Immersion Tanks are specifically designed for automated ultrasonic testing of complex composites parts used in aerospace and industrial applications.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window