where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

Zawada NDT
Suppliers of instruments to test steel wire ropes in-situ, using magnetic, non-destructive method.
5213 views
Technical Discussions
Dhiliban
Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP, India, Joined May 2016, 16

Dhiliban

Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP,
India,
Joined May 2016
16
10:02 Jul-16-2016
Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT

Dear Experts

What kind of angle beam probe to be selected for examining AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL wether longitudinal wave angle beam probe or shear wave angle beam probe

Since Austenitic Stainless steel is FCC crystal structre and coarse grains where the attenuation will be more what are the steps we should follow

 
 Reply 
 
Ali
NDT Inspector,
Iran, Joined Mar 2013, 117

Ali

NDT Inspector,
Iran,
Joined Mar 2013
117
10:29 Jul-16-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Dhiliban at 10:02 Jul-16-2016 (Opening).

Dhiliban,
Try the link below.
http://www.ndt.net/forum/thread.php?msgID=45536

 
 Reply 
 
Diego
Consultant,
Freelance, Spain, Joined May 2013, 197

Diego

Consultant,
Freelance,
Spain,
Joined May 2013
197
11:50 Jul-16-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Dhiliban at 10:02 Jul-16-2016 (Opening).

Dhiliban.
You may employ longitudinal dual element angle beam longitudinal wave probes. In addition, a weld mock up, with reference reflectors in the weld deposit, should be used. If you use the indicated probes, you should bear in mind that angle beam longitudinal wave search probes are normally limited to 1/2 path examinations, since there is a substantial loss in beam energy upon reflection due to mode conversion

 
 Reply 
 
Dhiliban
Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP, India, Joined May 2016, 16

Dhiliban

Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP,
India,
Joined May 2016
16
10:12 Jul-18-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Diego at 11:50 Jul-16-2016 .

Thanks Ali and Digeo

Mr.Diego
Why we have to specifically use longitudinal for examination of UT whether it will experience less attenuation

 
 Reply 
 
Arunprakash
NDT Inspector,
Caterpillar India, India, Joined Apr 2009, 30

Arunprakash

NDT Inspector,
Caterpillar India,
India,
Joined Apr 2009
30
12:00 Jul-18-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Dhiliban at 10:12 Jul-18-2016 .

Longitudinal wave would have less attenuation than shear wave for the given frequency.

Normally, Stainless steel have coarse grains, generally low frequency probes being selected for testing.

Attenuation is directly proportional to grain size of the material and indirectly proportional to wave length.

Shear wave would have approximately half of the value of longitudinal wave length for the given frequency. Hence attenuation is high for shear wave when compare to longitudinal wave for the given/selected frequency.

 
 Reply 
 
Arunprakash
NDT Inspector,
Caterpillar India, India, Joined Apr 2009, 30

Arunprakash

NDT Inspector,
Caterpillar India,
India,
Joined Apr 2009
30
13:14 Jul-18-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Dhiliban at 10:12 Jul-18-2016 .

For stainless steel testing, we need to have less attenuation which can be obtained from longitudinal wave of low frequency probe.

 
 Reply 
 
Diego
Consultant,
Freelance, Spain, Joined May 2013, 197

Diego

Consultant,
Freelance,
Spain,
Joined May 2013
197
17:28 Jul-18-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Dhiliban at 10:12 Jul-18-2016 .

Mr.
Mr. Dhiliban
There are several reasons to employ special probes in lieu of conventional probes.
a) Scattered energy from natural metallurgical discontinuities generates noise indications at higher amplitude than would be expected for the case of ferritic welds. The choice of wave mode
(longitudinal, shear) and probe characteristics (sound field, frequency, bandwidth, etc.) should be optimized to allow a reliable separation of weld defect indications from noise indications
b) The ultrasonic beam has to cross different regions in the parent metal and in the weld itself.
The velocity of sound may vary along this path and this may change the direction of the sound beam. Consequently, this may result in inaccuracy in determining reflector positions.
c) Attenuation in the weld metal is generally more severe than for ferritic welds and can be more or less pronounced depending on the angle of the beam with respect to the preferred orientation
direction of the grain structure. Therefore, the ultrasonic technique should seek to minimize beam path length in the weld metal and, where possible, aim to take advantage of any directions of reduced attenuation in the weld.
d) Beam divergence can also be directionally dependent. The beam profile is usually different from that measured in parent plate (whether ferritic or austenitic) so that size estimation methods which depend on a knowledge of the beam profile, such as the so-called dB drop methods, are not always suitable on austenitic welds.

 
 Reply 
 
dhiliban
Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP, India, Joined May 2016, 16

dhiliban

Other, QA/QC engineer
L&T HCP,
India,
Joined May 2016
16
14:37 Jul-19-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to Diego at 17:28 Jul-18-2016 .

Dear Mr.Arunprakash,Mr.Diego,Mr.Ali

Thanks for your detialied explaination

Mr.Diego
As you mentioned 6-DB method will not produce accurate result,wether the results are accetpable eventhough they are approximate,If not so

Then which technique we have to depend for defect sizing.

Thanks in advance
Dhiliban

 
 Reply 
 
Diego
Consultant,
Freelance, Spain, Joined May 2013, 197

Diego

Consultant,
Freelance,
Spain,
Joined May 2013
197
22:09 Jul-19-2016
Re: Probe selection for examination of austenitic stainless steel welds with UT
In Reply to dhiliban at 14:37 Jul-19-2016 .

Download Notes for sizing flaws Virus Scan recommended!

Mr .Dhiliban
Specifically I have not mentioned the 6-DB method. I referred all methods which are called dB drop. Of course the 6-DB method is included.
In notesforsizingflaws, see document attached, there are some notes for sizing defects. These notes were prepared by me a few years ago, and taking as reference Handbook On the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Welds and the ASTM standard E-2192 . I advise you to read this standard.
If you want more help to deepen this topic, let me know by sending me an email to my address
1
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

32:128PR PAUT & 2-ch TOFD Flaw Detector: SyncScan 2

●32:128PR PAUT with optional 2-ch TOFD to maximize your efficiency ●Support PR mode for corrosi
...
on inspection ●Multiple solutions for welds & corrosion ●Faster scan speed (Approximately 3 meters/minute) ●Light weight: 4kg only including battery
>

VeeScan AirCraft Wheel Inspection

The VEESCAN offers maximum flexibility, has a proven mechanical design and records of breakdown-fr
...
ee operation of over 365 days. Appealing to companies in the Aerospace industry, the VEESCAN is ideal for all wheel-testing environments. With a wide selection of probes, the VeeScan allows your wheel testing facility the flexibility to select the most compatible configurations with their workload.
>

OmniScan™ X3 flaw detector

The OmniScan X3 flaw detector is a complete phased array toolbox. Powerful tools, like total focus
...
ing method (TFM) images and advanced visualization capabilities, enable you to complete your inspection with greater confidence.
>

On-Demand Webinar: Advanced Ultrasonic Techniques for HTHA Detection & Assessment

In the Oil and Gas industry, High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) can occur in steels operating a
...
t high temperature, usually above 205°C (400°F). Early stages of HTHA are very difficult to detect. Join us for a webinar presented by Guy Maes, Zetec Sales Engineer Director. The webinar will demonstrate how advanced ultrasonic techniques are deployed for efficient and reliable HTHA inspections.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window