where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1745 views
Technical Discussions
N.DHANASEKARAN
R & D
WELDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BHEL, India, Joined Jun 2005, 3

N.DHANASEKARAN

R & D
WELDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BHEL,
India,
Joined Jun 2005
3
02:31 Jun-17-2005
sensitivity in ut

hello,
I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
N.DHANASEKARAN


 
 Reply 
 
S.V.Swamy
Engineering, - Material Testing Inspection & Quality Control
Retired from Nuclear Fuel Complex , India, Joined Feb 2001, 787

S.V.Swamy

Engineering, - Material Testing Inspection & Quality Control
Retired from Nuclear Fuel Complex ,
India,
Joined Feb 2001
787
06:12 Jun-19-2005
Re: sensitivity in ut
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: hello,
: I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
: N.DHANASEKARAN
------------ End Original Message ------------

Dear Shri Dhanasekaran,

Your question will be answered by the designer for a given application. Resolving power depends, as you are no doubt aware on the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave used. The shorter the wavelength, the better is the resolution obtainable, keeping all other conditions same. However, the wavelength which one can use depends on the material, processing history, surface condition, thickness etc. Keeping all these factors in view, the designer is expected to specify the minimum size of a discontinuity to be detected.

With best wishes,

Swamy




 
 Reply 
 
Ed T.
Ed T.
01:07 Jun-19-2005
Re: sensitivity in ut
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : hello,
: : I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
: : N.DHANASEKARAN
: Dear Shri Dhanasekaran,
: Your question will be answered by the designer for a given application. Resolving power depends, as you are no doubt aware on the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave used. The shorter the wavelength, the better is the resolution obtainable, keeping all other conditions same. However, the wavelength which one can use depends on the material, processing history, surface condition, thickness etc. Keeping all these factors in view, the designer is expected to specify the minimum size of a discontinuity to be detected.
: With best wishes,
: Swamy
------------ End Original Message ------------

You must keep in mind that there are distinct differences between resolving power and sensitivity. Your ability to detect a flaw of a given size is a function of your wavelength, type, shape and orientation of the flaw.
Resolving power or being able to resolve the indication from other reflectors (resolution)is another story.
That is a function of your wavelength as well as your pulse length, pulse repetition rate and damping.
These settings must be finely tuned to optimize the resolution of your UT system.
This is all theoretical, however. It all depends on the type, shape, orientation and frequency response obtained from the flaw(s).
Just because you interrogate a flaw with a given frequency does not mean that is the frequency that you will receive back from the flaw.



 
 Reply 
 
Philippe Rubbers
Engineering
SCM, South Africa, Joined Nov 1998, 22

Philippe Rubbers

Engineering
SCM,
South Africa,
Joined Nov 1998
22
05:24 Jun-20-2005
Re: sensitivity in ut
A common comment is that frequency determines the resolving power. A more accurate comment would be to say it is the bandwidth (in Hz) that determines resolving power. However, since bandwidth ranges from 60% to 120% of the centre frequency, yes the centre frequency indirectly determines resolving power.
Note that Phased array probes have very poor bandwidth at the lower end of the scale (typically 70% only).
If there is a supplier of broadband PA probes, please let me know.

Best regards

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : : hello,
: : : I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
: : : N.DHANASEKARAN
: : Dear Shri Dhanasekaran,
: : Your question will be answered by the designer for a given application. Resolving power depends, as you are no doubt aware on the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave used. The shorter the wavelength, the better is the resolution obtainable, keeping all other conditions same. However, the wavelength which one can use depends on the material, processing history, surface condition, thickness etc. Keeping all these factors in view, the designer is expected to specify the minimum size of a discontinuity to be detected.
: : With best wishes,
: : Swamy
: You must keep in mind that there are distinct differences between resolving power and sensitivity. Your ability to detect a flaw of a given size is a function of your wavelength, type, shape and orientation of the flaw.
: Resolving power or being able to resolve the indication from other reflectors (resolution)is another story.
: That is a function of your wavelength as well as your pulse length, pulse repetition rate and damping.
: These settings must be finely tuned to optimize the resolution of your UT system.
: This is all theoretical, however. It all depends on the type, shape, orientation and frequency response obtained from the flaw(s).
: Just because you interrogate a flaw with a given frequency does not mean that is the frequency that you will receive back from the flaw.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
N.DHANASEKARAN
R & D
WELDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BHEL, India, Joined Jun 2005, 3

N.DHANASEKARAN

R & D
WELDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BHEL,
India,
Joined Jun 2005
3
02:41 Jul-02-2005
Re: sensitivity in ut
Hello,
Response for the query is good. But still,to quantitatively measure the resolving power of a given combination of ut parameters,what to do?
N.Dhanasekaran

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: A common comment is that frequency determines the resolving power. A more accurate comment would be to say it is the bandwidth (in Hz) that determines resolving power. However, since bandwidth ranges from 60% to 120% of the centre frequency, yes the centre frequency indirectly determines resolving power.
: Note that Phased array probes have very poor bandwidth at the lower end of the scale (typically 70% only).
: If there is a supplier of broadband PA probes, please let me know.
: Best regards
: : : : hello,
: : : : I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
: : : : N.DHANASEKARAN
: : : Dear Shri Dhanasekaran,
: : : Your question will be answered by the designer for a given application. Resolving power depends, as you are no doubt aware on the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave used. The shorter the wavelength, the better is the resolution obtainable, keeping all other conditions same. However, the wavelength which one can use depends on the material, processing history, surface condition, thickness etc. Keeping all these factors in view, the designer is expected to specify the minimum size of a discontinuity to be detected.
: : : With best wishes,
: : : Swamy
: : You must keep in mind that there are distinct differences between resolving power and sensitivity. Your ability to detect a flaw of a given size is a function of your wavelength, type, shape and orientation of the flaw.
: : Resolving power or being able to resolve the indication from other reflectors (resolution)is another story.
: : That is a function of your wavelength as well as your pulse length, pulse repetition rate and damping.
: : These settings must be finely tuned to optimize the resolution of your UT system.
: : This is all theoretical, however. It all depends on the type, shape, orientation and frequency response obtained from the flaw(s).
: : Just because you interrogate a flaw with a given frequency does not mean that is the frequency that you will receive back from the flaw.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
N.Kuppusamy
Consultant, Level-III
United Testing Co. Pte Ltd, Singapore, Joined Jan 2003, 13

N.Kuppusamy

Consultant, Level-III
United Testing Co. Pte Ltd,
Singapore,
Joined Jan 2003
13
03:28 Jul-04-2005
Re: Sensitivity in UT
Friends,

What for you need to measure resolution quatitatively for a A-scan system? For all practical purposes, it is enough if you are able to discern the echoes from resolution holes (IOW Block) or notches (IIW Block).

Regards,
N.Kuppusamy


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Hello,
: Response for the query is good. But still,to quantitatively measure the resolving power of a given combination of ut parameters,what to do?
: N.Dhanasekaran
: : A common comment is that frequency determines the resolving power. A more accurate comment would be to say it is the bandwidth (in Hz) that determines resolving power. However, since bandwidth ranges from 60% to 120% of the centre frequency, yes the centre frequency indirectly determines resolving power.
: : Note that Phased array probes have very poor bandwidth at the lower end of the scale (typically 70% only).
: : If there is a supplier of broadband PA probes, please let me know.
: : Best regards
: : : : : hello,
: : : : : I have a query about the sensitivity possible by conventional UT ( Pulse echo - A scan ). Requirement of resolving power quantitatively like for a specific thickness and sensitivity , what is the minimum resolving power required?
: : : : : N.DHANASEKARAN
: : : : Dear Shri Dhanasekaran,
: : : : Your question will be answered by the designer for a given application. Resolving power depends, as you are no doubt aware on the wavelength of the ultrasonic wave used. The shorter the wavelength, the better is the resolution obtainable, keeping all other conditions same. However, the wavelength which one can use depends on the material, processing history, surface condition, thickness etc. Keeping all these factors in view, the designer is expected to specify the minimum size of a discontinuity to be detected.
: : : : With best wishes,
: : : : Swamy
: : : You must keep in mind that there are distinct differences between resolving power and sensitivity. Your ability to detect a flawof a given size is a function of your wavelength, type, shape and orientation of the flaw.
: : : Resolving power or being able to resolve the indication from other reflectors (resolution)is another story.
: : : That is a function of your wavelength as well as your pulse length, pulse repetition rate and damping.
: : : These settings must be finely tuned to optimize the resolution of your UT system.
: : : This is all theoretical, however. It all depends on the type, shape, orientation and frequency response obtained from the flaw(s).
: : : Just because you interrogate a flaw with a given frequency does not mean that is the frequency that you will receive back from the flaw.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Lyft™: Pulsed Eddy Current Reinvented

PEC Reinvented—CUI Programs Redefined Corrosion under insulation (CUI) is possibly the greatest u
...
nresolved asset integrity problem in the industry. Current methods for measuring wall thickness with liftoff, without removing insulation, all have severe limitations. Eddyfi introduces Lyft — a reinvented, high-performance pulsed eddy current (PEC) solution. The patent- pending system features a state-of-the-art portable instrument, real- time C-scan imaging, fast data acquisition with grid-mapping and dynamic scanning modes, and flexibility with long cables. It can also scan through thick metal and insulation, as well as aluminum, stainless steel, and galvanized steel weather jackets. Who else but Eddyfi to reinvent an eddy current technique and redefine CUI programs. Got Lyft?
>

NDTkit RT

NDTkit RT, TESTIA's Digital Radiography software The NDTkit product line software for X-ray analysi
...
s. NDTkit RT is a software benefiting from the Ultis kernel which is dedicated to radiographic image analysis. It offers a set of tools and filtering processes to assist RT operators in finding relevant flaws.
>

UCI Hardness Tester NOVOTEST T-U2

UCI hardness tester NOVOTEST T-U2 is is used for non-destructive hardness testing of: metals and
...
alloys by scales of hardness: Rockwell (HRC), Brinell (HB), Vickers (HV); non-ferrous metals, alloys of iron etc., and using five additional scales for calibration; with tensile strength (Rm) scale determines the tensile strength of carbon steel pearlitic products by automatic recalculation from Brinell (HB) hardness scale.
>

Teletest Focus+

Teletest Focus+ electronics have superior capabilities than rivals on the market. Beyond the usual
...
test features, Focus+ has 24 transmit channels and 24 receive channels, with an additional on-board switching capabilities. The instrument's frequency range is 10–300 kHz.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window