where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

2640 views
Technical Discussions
azmi
azmi
01:21 Jul-04-2007
UT after MT. Surface preparation

Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.


 
 Reply 
 
chris s
chris s
08:00 Jul-06-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
------------ End Original Message ------------

that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.


 
 Reply 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
06:33 Jul-11-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
chris s
chris s
00:18 Jul-12-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
:
: : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What imean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
------------ End Original Message ------------

i did not see any mention of a paint coating



 
 Reply 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
05:33 Jul-13-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
chris

If a fluorescent technique not requiring a contrast paint coating is required, then surface condition is even more critical. In nearly all other cases a contrast paint coat is required.

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
: :
: : : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
: i did not see any mention of a paint coating
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
chris s
chris s
08:09 Jul-17-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
are you talking about a developer?

: chris
: If a fluorescent technique not requiring a contrast paint coating is required, then surface condition is even more critical. In nearly all other cases a contrast paint coat is required.
: : : It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
: : :
: : : : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : : : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
: : i did not see any mention of a paint coating
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

OmniScan™ X3 flaw detector

The OmniScan X3 flaw detector is a complete phased array toolbox. Powerful tools, like total focus
...
ing method (TFM) images and advanced visualization capabilities, enable you to complete your inspection with greater confidence.
>

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

MUSE Mobile Ultrasonic Equipment

The MUSE, a portable ultrasonic imaging system, was developed for in-field inspections of light-weig
...
ht structures. The MUSE consists of a motor-driven manipulator, a water circulation system for the acoustic coupling and a portable ultrasonic flaw detector (USPC 3010). The MUSE provides images of internal defects (A-, B-,C- and D-scan).
>

Research and Application Development For NDT

Acuren’s Research and Application Development specializes in the development of advanced ultraso
...
nic inspection techniques and systems for challenging inspection applications, with an emphasis on practical solutions which are field deployable. Services include manual and automated ultrasonic inspection system development, inspection technique optimization using laboratory scale studies and ultrasonic modeling (CIVA, BeamTool), preparing technical justification for technique evaluation and qualification (Probability of Detection and sizing accuracy studies), inspection/calibration/analysis procedure preparation to support field deployment of custom techniques, and development of custom imaging algorithms to support challenging inspection applications.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window