where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

802 views
Technical Discussions
Rolf D.
Director,
NDT.net, Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 617

Rolf D.

Director,
NDT.net,
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
617
01:49 Sep-10-1996
Is the GE specification good and still relevant?

The GE spec describes the probe's and equipment's capability
for its near to surface resolution.
See also GE Spec in UT A-Z.

For my opinion this specification let to much parameters open,
for instant there is not any dB value mentioned about the
signal noise ratio at the flaw's echo. Is this true?

Are there better standards available?


 
 Reply 
 
Robert A. Dau
Engineering
Milky Way Jewels, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 40

Robert A. Dau

Engineering
Milky Way Jewels,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
40
09:49 Sep-11-1996
Re: Is the GE specification good and still relevant?
Rolf -

Near surface resolution remains a difficult area to
specify because the actual parameters you need depend on
what size defect you need to detect and on the signal-to-
noise you need to reliably detect it. Certainly the GE
specification will not be adequate in some cases, it
will be in others. So my answer is it depends.

One very good way to make a specification for a
particular test is to pin everything down. Specify the
near surface resolution in terms of a reference FBH a
certain distance from the surface and the dB of signal-
to-noise you need. The GE specification is of this type
but not completely rigorous because it doesn't specify
how you measure SN. If you want to detect 0.4 mm FBH 1.2
mm into steel. The GE spec. is good although putting a
more "scientific" definition on the two wave amplitudes
is desirable.

If you want to apply the GE spec. to another material
that is more attenuative for example, then the GE spec.
will be inappropriate. Specifying the near surface
independently from the application is as far as I can
see beyond our current knowledge. The "do everything in
steel and translate to other materials method" is of
limited use to most ultrasonic users because there are
no "translation" codes available to do that. Indeed
there is not much data on attenuation as a function of
frequency out "there."

I might also add that near surface resolution is more
complex than most ultrasonic measurements because it is
a function of almost every parameter you can think off.
Center frequency, band width (damping), material
attenuation, element diameter, focal length, instrument
setting, and water path all change near surface
resolution. So I think you are stuck with using the GE
Spec. and "translating" it experimentally to your needs
or of creating a spec. specific to your own needs.

Regards,
Rocky

: The GE spec describes the probe's and equipment's capability
:for its near to surface resolution.
: See also GE Spec in UT A-Z.

: For my opinion this specification let to much parameters open,
: for instant there is not any dB value mentioned about the
: signal noise ratio at the flaw's echo. Is this true?

: Are there better standards available?




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

UCI Hardness Tester NOVOTEST T-U2

UCI hardness tester NOVOTEST T-U2 is is used for non-destructive hardness testing of: metals and
...
alloys by scales of hardness: Rockwell (HRC), Brinell (HB), Vickers (HV); non-ferrous metals, alloys of iron etc., and using five additional scales for calibration; with tensile strength (Rm) scale determines the tensile strength of carbon steel pearlitic products by automatic recalculation from Brinell (HB) hardness scale.
>

FMC/TFM

Next generation for Phased Array UT is here now with FMC/TFM! Have higher resolution imaging, impr
...
oved signal to noise ratio, characterize, size and analyze defects better with access to several wave mode views and save raw FMC data for higher quality analysis.  Some of the benefits are:
  • Beautiful Image! Easier to understand what you're looking at
  • Completely focused in entire image or volume
  • Much easier to define setups before inspection
  • Easier to decipher geometry echoes from real defects
  • Oriented defects (e.g. cracks) are imaged better
  • See image from different wave modes from one FMC inspection
  • FMC data can be reprocessed/analyzed without going back to the field
>

CIVA 2020 UT Module

CIVA NDE Simulation Software is the world leader of NDT Simulation. The UT simulation Module incl
...
udes: - "Beam computation": Beam propagation simulation - "Inspection Simulation": Beam interaction with flaws or specimens The user can simulate a whole inspection process (pulse echo, tandem or TOFD) with a wide range of probes (conventional, Phased- arrays or EMAT), components, and flaws.
>

Wireless TOFD scanner

Quick, accurate and highly reproducible welds testing. The System operates wirelessly and is compat
...
ible with any type of Windows based Laptop, Desktop or Tablet.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window