where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
661 views
Technical Discussions
Frits Dijkstra
Frits Dijkstra
02:58 Aug-25-1998
Restrictions of TOFD

The Time Of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) method, invented in the UK in the seventies, is now being used in several countries for routine NDT of welds. A method description exists, in the form of prEN 583 part 6. In The Netherlands, acceptance criteria for weld defects detected with TOFD were recently developed in a Joint Industry project, in which a.o. plant owners, manufacturers, NDT service companies and authorities were involved.

Although TOFD has been demonstrated to offer a very good probability of detection, experts agree that the technique is connected with restrictions in flaw detectability near the surface. The extent of the "dead zone" is, as previously explained by Schlengermann and Wuestenberg on this web-forum, influenced by a.o. signal length. In addition, it appears that misalignment (hi-lo) of welds in practice may increase the influence of the dead zone. On the other hand, high-resolution transducers and software algorithms such as straightening and lateral wave removal may help, but not in all cases.

It should be kept in mind that radiography and manual (pulse echo) UT have substantial restrictions as well, which we have comfortably lived with for many years. Therefore, it seems not unreasonable that TOFD is now accepted to replace RT or manual (pulse echo) UT for selected applications. Sometimes, combinations of TOFD with other techniques such as pulse-echo UT and / or magnetic particle inspection (just like other NDT methods sometimes need) will be required to meet defect detection requirements. Equipment allowing such combined inspection (TOFD plus pulse-echo) exists, e.g. RTD Rotoscan or Combiscan or others. Such combinations, if correctly applied, can lead to very reliable NDT, because "the best of two worlds" can be combined, using one technique as a "safety net" for the other.

TOFD is an NDT technique with high potential, and it is used on an increasingly large scale. But, it is not the ultimate solution to every NDT problem.




 
 Reply 
 
Jan Verkooijen
Jan Verkooijen
07:24 Sep-23-1998
Re: Restrictions of TOFD
I would like to endorse what Mr. Dijkstra has written
here. As allready stated during my comments at the ECNDT
at Kopenhagen, and also said here by Mr. Dijkstra,
it is clear that Time Of Flight Diffraction
is not the sole answer to all NDT problems in the world.
There are applications, such as the pre-service inspection
of welds, where it has been proven that TOFD is perfectly
capable of replacing an other technique in standard applications.
There are also cases where it is advisable to supplement TOFD
with other techniques should this be necessary to assure
the safety and reliability of the component, just as we
are used to do with the exisiting NDT techniques.
To be able to determine whether/when this is necessary, and which
techniques should be chosen, we still need more objective data
on POD, false call rate, sizing capabilities etc, not only
for TOFD, but also for other NDE techniques. It is
therefore that currently an international program of work is
being prepared to produce such data, to validate acceptance criteria and to
advise on training and certification standards for TOFD.
Only if we all work towards standards which are accepted
and adhered to, we can expect TOFD to become
available to NDT professionals as another valuable
tool to assure the integrity of components in industry.

: The Time Of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) method, invented in the UK in the seventies, is now being used in several countries for routine NDT of welds. A method description exists, in the form of prEN 583 part 6. In The Netherlands, acceptance criteria for weld defects detected with TOFD were recently developed in a Joint Industry project, in which a.o. plant owners, manufacturers, NDT service companies and authorities were involved.

: Although TOFD has been demonstrated to offer a very good probability of detection, experts agree that the technique is connected with restrictions in flaw detectability near the surface. The extent of the "dead zone" is, as previously explained by Schlengermann and Wuestenberg on this web-forum, influenced by a.o. signal length. In addition, it appears that misalignment (hi-lo) of welds in practice may increase the influence of the dead zone. On the other hand, high-resolution transducers and software algorithms such as straightening and lateral wave removal may help, but not in all cases.

: It should be kept in mind that radiography and manual (pulse echo) UT have substantial restrictions as well, which we have comfortably lived with for many years. Therefore, it seems not unreasonable that TOFD is now accepted to replace RT or manual (pulse echo) UT for selected applications. Sometimes, combinations of TOFD with other techniques such as pulse-echo UT and / or magnetic particle inspection (just like other NDT methods sometimes need) will be required to meet defect detection requirements. Equipment allowing such combined inspection (TOFD plus pulse-echo) exists, e.g. RTD Rotoscan or Combiscan or others. Such combinations, if correctly applied, can lead to very reliable NDT, because "the best of two worlds" can be combined, using one technique as a "safety net" for the other.

: TOFD is an NDT technique with high potential, and it is used on an increasingly large scale. But, it is not the ultimate solution to every NDT problem.




 
 Reply 
 
Jorden
Jorden
00:38 Feb-03-2007
Osbaldo
http://forum.finddesk.org/animal-health-pet.html


 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Ultrasonic Squirter/Gantry System

TecScan’s NDT Ultrasonic Gantry Systems are industrial Squirter scanners designed for non-destru
...
ctive quality testing and raster scanning of large structures and parts. The Gantry Systems are usually composed of an Industrial Mechanical Scanner and a Control Room with System Workstation.
>

NEW - TD Focus-ScanRX

The NEW Next Generation Advanced UT platform, TD Focus ScanRX - Also available as a card stack solut
...
ion. Key Improvements 1. Data acquisition is significantly faster than current design 2. Better aesthetic – closely aligns with HandyScan RX 3. Improved IP rating (Target IP66) 4. Ruggedized housing 5. Connectors are protected from impact and ingress 6. Integrated stand and separate retractable handle easy to keep clean) 7. Touchscreen with ruggedized display glass 8. 3-Axis encoder input
>

Research Center IDEKO develops an ultrasonic train wheel inspection system for CAF

The Basque Research centre IK4-IDEKO has developed a state-of-the-art ultrasonic inspection system f
...
or the train wheel. This system secures a sound condition of train wheels and is thus a significant contribution to rail transport safety. The device was delivered to CAF recently and its use allows the manufacturer to become an approved supplier of rolling stock in Italy, as it meets the demanding homologation standards of this country. \\\\r\\\\n
>

Eddy Current inspection : RotoETscan Rotating Head

The rotating head RotoETscan detects the presence of longitudinal surface or sub surface defects a
...
t high speed. The rotating head is often installed directly on the production line. It is generally dedicated to the control of long products such as tubes, bars and wires, made of ferrous or non-ferrous material. It can also be used for inspection of small parts (billets).
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window