where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

NOVO DR
develops and manufactures cutting edge Portable Digital Radiography X-ray Inspection Systems.
515 views
Technical Discussions
James Dolfi
Director
ford, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 8

James Dolfi

Director
ford,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
8
00:42 Oct-07-1998
Ultrasonic testing of spot welds

(Here is the completed version of the message 2 days ago)

The following is quoted from the paper on testing of autobody spotwelds.

'A modified ultrasonic testing method clearly detects stick welds and
cold welds, this is not possible with normal ultrasonic methods.
When testing under production conditions, 98% of the welds tested are
correctly evaluated, i.e. values obtained from the ultrasonic test
satisfactorily corresponded to the results from the teardown test.'
The link to the paper is: http://www.ndt.net/article/0498/spotw/spotw.htm

The above quoted statement would be true of most testing of autobody
spotwelds for the following reason.---

The body welding performance is typically very high and can reach 98% or
more. When an operator calls all welds good he can only be wrong 2% of
the time. If the report claims 98% correlation or 98% reliability I believe
that is misleading the readers to believe the testing system is capable of
accurately detecting both good and bad welds (with one calibration
setting). I have read detailed reports that do just as outlined above.
They report 98% accuracy but the item under test had 98% good items (welds)
in the test population. I could claim the same accuracy and be correct by
simply reporting all welds are good!

The way to present reliability data is to include the ALPHA and BETA
error data along with the claim of reliability for the test system. As
mentioned in other articles, the way to report could be:

1-ALPHA * 1-BETA = TEST RELIABILITY

Where:
ALPHA is the proportion of good called bad
BETA is the proportion of bad called good

I believe that a standard method of reporting or at lease the
computational method used to establish reliability should be included in any
such report.

Is there a standard with which you expect data to be reported?
Would you please comment on the appropriate measure of a
checking-gauge's performance?

Note:
My concern is that the measurement system should reject bad items and
not reject good items. Any checking system looses effectiveness when it
begins to reject good or accept bad items. My present requirement for
testing is 3% alpha (max) error and 15% beta (max) error (without
re-calibrating the system). Using the above 3% and 15% requirements,
the system only has to be about 82% reliable.



 
 Reply 
 
rasul maleki
rasul maleki
03:37 Mar-04-2002
Re: Ultrasonic testing of spot welds
dear,i studid your paper and enjoyed that.please send me more information about the method of your testing and describe me how did you do that.my email is maleki_ir@yahoo.com
thanks alot.


 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Surf-X® Array Probe

Introducing the Surf-X family of flexible Eddy Current Array (ECA) probes. Featuring unique multiple
...
coil sets and proprietary X-PROBE technology, Surf-X array probes can quickly and accurately handle a range of inspection applications, from inspecting corrosion or cracking in pipes, pressure vessels, or tanks, to assessing and sizing cracks in raised welds and friction stir welds.
>

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

NDT Master Lecturer

In the program both university professors and practitioners will give lectures, which guarantees the
...
oretical depth and practical inside. Academic Director: Prof. Dr. Christian Boller
The following lecturers are not complete: Prof. Tadeusz Stepinski, Prof. Wieslaw Staszewski, Prof. Frank Walther, Prof. Giovanni Bruno, Prof. Gerd Dobmann, Prof. Philippe Guy
>

YXLON Cougar EVO

Scalable small footprint X-ray inspection systems for assembly and laboratory applications. The
...
YXLON Cougar EVO series was designed to provide the "best-in- class" inspection solutions for SMT, semiconductor, and laboratory assembly applications, while maintaining a small system footprint for maximum convenience. With optimized software and hardware, these systems produce higher quality and more consistent results than other electronics inspection systems currently on the market.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window