where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

1785 views
Technical Discussions
kavita
kavita
03:04 Jan-24-2003
some questions regarding impact echo

I have some questions regarding NDE and impact echo in particular, for concrete pipes.
1)Has ever been SASW (spectral analysis of surface waves) been used for evaluating the integrity of concrete pipe. Can anybody give me a case study?
2)I've read some where that SASW and impact echo are similar to some extent. to what extent are they similar and hpw are they different.
3)why are S-waves ignored in impact echo testing?

Thanx advance for your answers




 
 Reply 
 
kavita
kavita
00:01 Jan-25-2003
one more question
: I have some questions regarding NDE and impact echo in particular, for concrete pipes.
: 1)Has ever been SASW (spectral analysis of surface waves) been used for evaluating the integrity of concrete pipe. Can anybody give me a case study?
: 2)I've read some where that SASW and impact echo are similar to some extent. to what extent are they similar and hpw are they different.
: 3)why are S-waves ignored in impact echo testing?
. 4)what is the difference between impact-echo and impulse response. is it that in impulse response the stress wave is generated by a transmitter and in impact-echo that is done by mechanical impact.
: Thanx advance for your answers
.



 
 Reply 
 
Franc Buijsen
Franc Buijsen
03:09 Jan-25-2003
Re: some questions regarding impact echo
I advise you to contact a company called Andec in Toronto Canada, andec@andec.on.ca. They are very familiar with concrete testing using impact echo.

regards

Franc

: I have some questions regarding NDE and impact echo in particular, for concrete pipes.
: 1)Has ever been SASW (spectral analysis of surface waves) been used for evaluating the integrity of concrete pipe. Can anybody give me a case study?
: 2)I've read some where that SASW and impact echo are similar to some extent. to what extent are they similar and hpw are they different.
: 3)why are S-waves ignored in impact echo testing?
.
: Thanx advance for your answers
.



 
 Reply 
 
Christian Grosse
Teacher,
Technische Universität München, Germany, Joined Nov 2000, 11

Christian Grosse

Teacher,
Technische Universität München,
Germany,
Joined Nov 2000
11
02:42 Jan-31-2003
Re: some questions regarding impact echo
These are several interesting questions and a discussion could be
useful. I am not an expert in SASW, but maybe you can point to a proper
source of information.

Regarding question 3 I am not sure if I understand the benefit you
expect to get using S-waves additionally to P-waves. However, since the
impact usually used in impact-echo testing produces mainly compressional
waves, I would not expect S-waves to be very dominant. These problems
are now addressed by a collaborative research project in Germany (see
http://www.for384.uni-stuttgart.de/) using a combination of experiments
and simulations. The answer is: This is ongoing research.

If you understand impulse response as a technique generating stress
waves by ultrasound emitters, this could be a difference to impact-echo.
To generate high amplitude pulses usually piezo-electric emitters of the
resonant type are used. The idea of impact-echo is instead to use
broadband pulses (pulses with energy over a broader frequency band) to
detect "reverbations" caused by flaws in different depth. This is
another difference to most ultrasound impulse techniques. The amplitudes
generated by broadband piezo-electric emitters are usually too weak.

Christian Grosse


---------------------------------
: I have some questions regarding NDE and impact echo in particular, for concrete pipes.
: 1)Has ever been SASW (spectral analysis of surface waves) been used for evaluating the integrity of concrete pipe. Can anybody give me a case study?
: 2)I've read some where that SASW and impact echo are similar to some extent. to what extent are they similar and hpw are they different.
: 3)why are S-waves ignored in impact echo testing?
.
: Thanx advance for your answers
.



 
 Reply 
 
kavita
kavita
00:33 Feb-05-2003
Re: some questions regarding impact echo
Thank You Mr.Grosse!


 
 Reply 
 
WILLIAM A. WEBER
Director
IMPACT-ECHO INSTRUMENTS,LLC, USA, Joined Mar 2003, 2

WILLIAM A. WEBER

Director
IMPACT-ECHO INSTRUMENTS,LLC,
USA,
Joined Mar 2003
2
06:16 Mar-24-2003
Re: some questions regarding impact echo
: These are several interesting questions and a discussion could be
: useful. I am not an expert in SASW, but maybe you can point to a proper
: source of information.
.
: Regarding question 3 I am not sure if I understand the benefit you
: expect to get using S-waves additionally to P-waves. However, since the
: impact usually used in impact-echo testing produces mainly compressional
: waves, I would not expect S-waves to be very dominant. These problems
: are now addressed by a collaborative research project in Germany (see
: http://www.for384.uni-stuttgart.de/) using a combination of experiments
: and simulations. The answer is: This is ongoing research.
.
: If you understand impulse response as a technique generating stress
: waves by ultrasound emitters, this could be a difference to impact-echo.
: To generate high amplitude pulses usually piezo-electric emitters of the
: resonant type are used. The idea of impact-echo is instead to use
: broadband pulses (pulses with energy over a broader frequency band) to
: detect "reverbations" caused by flaws in different depth. This is
: another difference to most ultrasound impulse techniques. The amplitudes
: generated by broadband piezo-electric emitters are usually too weak.
.
: Christian Grosse
.
:
: ---------------------------------
: : I have some questions regarding NDE and impact echo in particular, for concrete pipes.
: : 1)Has ever been SASW (spectral analysis of surface waves) been used for evaluating the integrity of concrete pipe. Can anybody give me a case study?
: : 2)I've read some where that SASW and impact echo are similar to some extent. to what extent are they similar and hpw are they different.
: : 3)why are S-waves ignored in impact echo testing?
: .
: : Thanx advance for your answers
: .
.CHRISTIAN,

TAKE A LOOK AT OUR WEBSITE, WWW.IMPACT-ECHO.COM; IT HAS CASE HISTORIES AND LOTS OF INFO. WE ALSO SELL THE BOOK ON THE TOPIC WHICH WILL ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS. SORRY NOT TO REPLY SOONER, BUT I JUST SAW YOUR QUESTION.

BILL WEBER



 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

ISAFE3 Intrinsically Safe Sensor System

ISAFE3 intrinsically safe sensor system of Vallen Systeme is especially targeted at the petrochemica
...
l - as well as oil and gas transportation industry. The sensor system is designed for permanent monitoring or periodic inspection tasks. Sensors are available for different AE-frequency ranges optimized for corrosion and fatigue crack detection and other applications. The ISAFE 3 sensor system consists of an AE-sensor (model ISAS3) certified according to ATEX/IEC for installation in zone 0, gas group IIC, IP68, 20 to +60 °C, and a signal isolator (model SISO3) certified for installation in zone 2. An ISAS3 sensor can be mounted in atmosphere or submerged, e.g. in water or crude oil. It is supported by mounting tools for temporary (magnets) or permanent (welded) installation. ISAFE3 supports automatic sensor coupling test and can be used with any AE signal processor supporting 28V supply at 90 mA peak, e.g. Vallen Systeme ASIP-2/A.
>

TraiNDE UT

TraiNDE UT is a virtual tool associated with a signal database which simulates real inspection con
...
ditions for numerous applications (Type A/V1 block, DAC block, welds and plates).
>

CIVA 2020 UT Module

CIVA NDE Simulation Software is the world leader of NDT Simulation. The UT simulation Module incl
...
udes: - "Beam computation": Beam propagation simulation - "Inspection Simulation": Beam interaction with flaws or specimens The user can simulate a whole inspection process (pulse echo, tandem or TOFD) with a wide range of probes (conventional, Phased- arrays or EMAT), components, and flaws.
>

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window