where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

Vallen-Systeme GmbH
The Acoustic Emission Company! Since 1987 Vallen stands for competence and continuity in AE and for reliable business cooperation and support.
1668 views
Technical Discussions
jagan
Engineering,
Saudi Arabia, Joined Dec 2011, 23

jagan

Engineering,
Saudi Arabia,
Joined Dec 2011
23
14:18 Apr-04-2015
Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???

Gents,

Suggest a best technique to find materiel defect for 2inch 8.74mm inconnel625 meterial
To cover overall pipe from id to od, need to inspect entire length.

As of me IRIS is suitable
need other opinions in dis regards.

Thanks.

 
 Reply 
 
Johann Hinken
,
fitm Hinken Consult, Germany, Joined May 2014, 20

Johann Hinken

,
fitm Hinken Consult,
Germany,
Joined May 2014
20
15:05 Apr-08-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to jagan at 14:18 Apr-04-2015 (Opening).

Hello,
in case you are interested in defects being ferromagnetic inclusions, I suggest magnetometry. That is a sensitive magnetic measurement after magnetisation. If you are interested I can give you more details.
Regards, Johann

 
 Reply 
 
R Dhanasekaran
Other, TEAM LEADER NDT
VESTAS WIND TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT LTD, India, Joined Apr 2012, 15

R Dhanasekaran

Other, TEAM LEADER NDT
VESTAS WIND TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT LTD,
India,
Joined Apr 2012
15
11:25 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to jagan at 14:18 Apr-04-2015 (Opening).

Dear Jagan,

what kind of defects are you looking for?

i would not suggest IRIS for detecting Cracks.

Regards
R.Dhanasekaran

 
 Reply 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
12:13 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to R Dhanasekaran at 11:25 Apr-09-2015 .

What length of pipe (tube) and how many pipes? Is that 8,74mm wall thickness?

I would recommend immersion UT with one probe sending sound in at 0 degrees looking for longitudinal defects and another compression wave offset from TDC to introduce shear wave looking for radial (through thickness) defects. Pipe (tube) will be rotated. There is a simple calculation based on ID/OD to determine optimum offset.

 
 Reply 
 
jagan
Engineering,
Saudi Arabia, Joined Dec 2011, 23

jagan

Engineering,
Saudi Arabia,
Joined Dec 2011
23
14:20 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to Johann Hinken at 15:05 Apr-08-2015 .

Dear Johann Hinken,

Thanks forthe suggession.
can explain how it can be done
Magnetometry???

 
 Reply 
 
jagan
Engineering,
Saudi Arabia, Joined Dec 2011, 23

jagan

Engineering,
Saudi Arabia,
Joined Dec 2011
23
14:27 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to Nigel Armstrong at 12:13 Apr-09-2015 .

Dear Nigel Armstrong,

Yse 8.74mm wall thickness 2inch dia and its 60 meter long spool with more than ten welds.
length is also an issue if we go for immersion.

thanks.

 
 Reply 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
14:42 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to jagan at 14:27 Apr-09-2015 .

im amazed that you didnt consider giving this info origimally!

 
 Reply 
 
Johann Hinken
,
fitm Hinken Consult, Germany, Joined May 2014, 20

Johann Hinken

,
fitm Hinken Consult,
Germany,
Joined May 2014
20
16:30 Apr-09-2015
Re: Inconnel625 2" 8.74mm best technique for meterial defects???
In Reply to jagan at 14:20 Apr-09-2015 .

Hello Jagan,

the "magnetometry" consists of two steps: 1.) magnetizing the part in a strong dc magnetic field and 2.) scanning the surface of the part by a sensitive magnetometer which excludes the influence of background fields. The method is good for the detection of very small ferromagnetic inclusions in non-magnetic alloys like Inconel. We use it routinely in the inspection of aero engine turbine discs.

Regards, Johann

 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

32:128PR PAUT & 2-ch TOFD Flaw Detector: SyncScan 2

●32:128PR PAUT with optional 2-ch TOFD to maximize your efficiency ●Support PR mode for corrosi
...
on inspection ●Multiple solutions for welds & corrosion ●Faster scan speed (Approximately 3 meters/minute) ●Light weight: 4kg only including battery
>

NDTkit RT

NDTkit RT, TESTIA's Digital Radiography software The NDTkit product line software for X-ray analysi
...
s. NDTkit RT is a software benefiting from the Ultis kernel which is dedicated to radiographic image analysis. It offers a set of tools and filtering processes to assist RT operators in finding relevant flaws.
>

VeeScan AirCraft Wheel Inspection

The VEESCAN offers maximum flexibility, has a proven mechanical design and records of breakdown-fr
...
ee operation of over 365 days. Appealing to companies in the Aerospace industry, the VEESCAN is ideal for all wheel-testing environments. With a wide selection of probes, the VeeScan allows your wheel testing facility the flexibility to select the most compatible configurations with their workload.
>

IntraPhase Athena Phased Array System

The Athena Phased Array system, manufactured by WesDyne NDE Products & Technology, consists of a pha
...
sed array acquisition system and PC running IntraSpect software. A PC is used to perform acquisition, analysis and storage of the data. System hardware is capable of operating up to four data sets with any combination of phased array or conventional UT probes. NOW AVAILABLE IN 64-64 CONFIGURATION.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window