where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

# The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

 NOVO DR develops and manufactures cutting edge Portable Digital Radiography X-ray Inspection Systems.

 1261 views
Technical Discussions
Zeki Cosku Gokce
Zeki Cosku Gokce
01:34 Nov-26-2003
number of exposure

I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.

I would appriciate all the help

Regards

Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A., Panama, Joined Nov 2001, 44

Engineering, Inspection
Arco Industrial, S.A.,
Panama,
Joined Nov 2001
44
09:08 Nov-26-2003
Re: number of exposures
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.
: I would appriciate all the help
: Regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

Zeki:

As you may infer from the formula for geometric unsharpness: Ug=Fd/D, (where Ug is geometric unsharpness, F is focal size of the source, d is the distance from the source-side of the object to the film-side of the object, and D is the distance from the source to the source-side of the object) as you reach the borders of the film in a pipe shot situation, two thing will take placesimultaneously: the thikness of the material will increase and the source to object distance will decrease. Both of these factors conspire to increase the geometric unsharpness and make the details near the border of the film blurry. Add to this the effect created by the lessened angle of incidence of the radiation beam in that same area, and distotion of the image will also come in to play.

Without getting too technical (although the formulas are straight forward, and most of the math is just geometry and algebra), I would suggest, as a general rule of thumb, to incrase the distance from the source to the surface of the pipe, and to go to a 4 shot configuration. For extreme cases, it may be necessary to segment the pipe into even more parts.

Zeki Cosku Gokce
Zeki Cosku Gokce
06:05 Nov-27-2003
Re: number of exposures
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.
: : I would appriciate all the help
: : Regards
: Zeki:
: As you may infer from the formula for geometric unsharpness: Ug=Fd/D, (where Ug is geometric unsharpness, F is focal size of the source, d is the distance from the source-side of the object to the film-side of the object, and D is the distance from the source to the source-side of the object) as you reach the borders of the film in a pipe shot situation, two thing will take place simultaneously: the thikness of the material will increase and the source to object distance will decrease. Both of these factors conspire to increase the geometric unsharpness and make the details near the border of the film blurry. Add to this the effect created by the lessened angle of incidence of the radiation beam in that same area, and distotion of the image will also come in to play.
: Without getting too technical (although the formulas are straight forward, and most of the math is just geometry and algebra), I would suggest, as a general rule of thumb, to incrase the distance from the source to the surface of the pipe, and to go to a 4 shot configuration. For extreme cases, it may be necessary to segment the pipe into even more parts.
------------ End Original Message ------------

Dear Juan

Thank you for your prompt response. I am trying to write some code that will do various calculations for RT personnel. In my filed it is not practical to increase the source to surface distance, and for thick schedule pipes some times it is needed for more then 4 shots. My foremen thinks that there is a formula that will tell you how many shot you need minimum (it was on his level II exam). Are you aware of any?
regards

Zeki

NDT Inspector
NDT Insp. lab., Bulgaria, Joined Jul 2002, 2

NDT Inspector
NDT Insp. lab.,
Bulgaria,
Joined Jul 2002
2
09:42 Nov-27-2003
Re: number of exposure

Next week I'll send you a sample software-calculator(Number of Exposure).
Regards

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.
: I would appriciate all the help
: Regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

Uli Mletzko
R & D, Retired
Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 89

Uli Mletzko

R & D, Retired
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
89
02:26 Nov-27-2003
Re: number of exposure
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.
: I would appriciate all the help
: Regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

You can find information on this subject e.g. in European Standard EN 1435, Non-destructive testing of welds - Radiographic testing of welded joints.

There are several diagrammes in that standard, where you can directly find the numbers of exposures, depending on wall thickness, outer diameter and film-focus distance. In class A (standard quality) an increase of penetrated wall thickness from film center to film end of 10 percent is accepted, in class B (special quality) 20 percent. In addition, you have to follow a second rule, concerning the maximum allowed density difference (Delta D <= 1.5 in that standard) between film end and film center. This could force you to a larger number of expositions.

Regards
Uli Mletzko
NDT group, MPA, Univerity of Stuttgart, Germany

uli mletzko
R & D, Retired
Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 89

uli mletzko

R & D, Retired
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
89
02:30 Nov-27-2003
Re: number of exposure
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : I am wondering if there is a formula that can be used for determining the number of exposures for a pipe that is going to be bombed with double wall single view techniqe. It seems to me that for smaller pipes and thick schedual pipes the geometrical unsharpness can be out of range at the end of the film when they are shot in 3 exposures. But is there a right hand rule, commen practice or some kind of formula to determine how man poses that is needed for shooting a pipe.
: : I would appriciate all the help
: : Regards
: You can find information on this subject e.g. in European Standard EN 1435, Non-destructive testing of welds - Radiographic testing of welded joints.
: There are several diagrammes in that standard, where you can directly find the numbers of exposures, depending on wall thickness, outer diameter and film-focus distance. In class A (standard quality) an increase of penetrated wall thickness from film center to film end of 10 percent is accepted, in class B (special quality) 20 percent. In addition, you have to follow a second rule, concerning the maximum allowed density difference (Delta D <= 1.5 in that standard) between film end and film center. This could force you to a larger number of expositions.
: Regards
: Uli Mletzko
: NDT group, MPA, Univerity of Stuttgart, Germany
------------ End Original Message ------------

Sorry, in the hurry I made an almost unexcusable typing error.
Of course Class A is 20 percent, and class B is 10 percent.

Regards
Uli Mletzko

Product Spotlight

#### Teletest Focus+

Teletest Focus+ electronics have superior capabilities than rivals on the market. Beyond the usual
...
test features, Focus+ has 24 transmit channels and 24 receive channels, with an additional on-board switching capabilities. The instrument's frequency range is 10–300 kHz.
>

#### X-ray CT aids research into defect formation in AM parts

X-ray CT is used to research how additive manufacturing process parameters influence defect format
...
ion in AM parts.
>

#### TOPAZ® 64: Fully Integrated Portable 64 Channel PAUT Instrument with FMC & TFM

Introducing TOPAZ64, the industry’s most intelligent fully integrated, portable 64-channel phased
...
array ultrasound (UT) instrument. TOPAZ64 combines code-compliant phased array UT with the industry’s most advanced full matrix capture (FMC) and total focusing method (TFM) capabilities. Featuring the highest acquisition frequency in its class, high resolution FMC and a 12” multi-touchscreen, users can easily visualize even the smallest flaws. TOPAZ64 can generate a bipolar pulse that provides more acoustic energy versus previous models for punching through thick components. The result is a portable tool that delivers increased inspection coverage, more accurate signals, and the ability to handle all UT inspections in one package. TOPAZ64 is ideal for challenging applications in transportation, oil and gas, manufacturing and power generation.
>

#### EKOSCAN Phased Array

In order to always fit your needs, EKOSCAN can manufacture any type of UT transducer, either convent
...
ional or Phased Array. As an ISO 9001: 2015 certified company, EKOSCAN is extremely careful as far a material selection and manufacturing processes are concerned. Our probes guarantee our customers the benefits of latest innovations regarding piezo-composite, backing, impedance adaptation layer, etc. Specific probes for hostile environment: high temperature, high pressure, corrosive environment,etc. Specific probes designed to fit your specific application: optimization of every parameter to guarantee you the best detection.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window