where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
Articles & News
23:19 Jan-03-2017
Tap Testing vs. Thermography

This is a very academic article, which lacks the practical aspects. The specimen are nontypical for the field of application of those techniques. Coin/Taptest are typically used as first step approaches to test delamination or debonding in FRPs, Sandwich and Metal/Metal bonds. But such simple samples are in no way representing the reality of industrial applications.
I would recommend the authors and as well the readers to take notice of the work published by the SAE CACRC ITG (SAE Commercial Aircraft Composite Repair Committee, Inspection Task Group) conducted by the FAA AANC at the Sandia Labs in Albuquerque. You can find all relevant documents at the SAE Homepage, or search the Internet for papers from Dennis Roach about POD - here some examples - e.g.:
- https://www.niar.wichita.edu/niarworkshops/Portals/0/Friday_800_Roach.pdf
- https://www.niar.wichita.edu/niarworkshops/Portals/0/Friday_800_Roach.pdf
- http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2003/032112.pdf
- https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1115463
- http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/tc15-6.pdf
- http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/tc15-4.pdf
There is an ongoing work described, which started about more than 15 years ago and it is permanently updated. especially the POD studies are the airworthiness authority accepted POD data form real field exercises and specific Validation Center results. If you check the contributors list, you see the world recognized major drivers
in the aeronautical industrial NDT Business with the most experience.
I would minimum expect, that if staring such a study, the Autors take notice of the state of the art. I miss any reference to these basic data in the paper.


Product Spotlight

High-end Ultrasonic Flaw Detector with 32:128PR PAUT and 2-ch TOFD: SyncScan 2

SIUI’s newly launched SyncScan 2, is a high-end ultrasonic flaw detector with 32:128PR PAUT and
2-ch TOFD, which can maximize your efficiency for PA and TOFD. ● Support PA/TOFD/UT ● 32-ch PA is more suitable for inspection on extra-thick wall and high-attenuation material. ● 32-ch PA and 2-ch TOFD work simultaneously. ● Support PR mode for corrosion inspection.


TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.

MUSE Mobile Ultrasonic Equipment

The MUSE, a portable ultrasonic imaging system, was developed for in-field inspections of light-weig
ht structures. The MUSE consists of a motor-driven manipulator, a water circulation system for the acoustic coupling and a portable ultrasonic flaw detector (USPC 3010). The MUSE provides images of internal defects (A-, B-,C- and D-scan).

UCI Hardness Tester NOVOTEST T-U2

UCI hardness tester NOVOTEST T-U2 is is used for non-destructive hardness testing of: metals and
alloys by scales of hardness: Rockwell (HRC), Brinell (HB), Vickers (HV); non-ferrous metals, alloys of iron etc., and using five additional scales for calibration; with tensile strength (Rm) scale determines the tensile strength of carbon steel pearlitic products by automatic recalculation from Brinell (HB) hardness scale.

We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
this is debug window