where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1253 views
Technical Discussions
General
General
01:07 Nov-30-2004
Sizing Defects

When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.

Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?

If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.

What is the correct way?


 
 Reply 
 
Chris Jones
Chris Jones
07:46 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
Hello,

I have not worked on compliance testing for some time and when I did I rarely worked to ASME codes.

However, I do remember one rule that was commonly applied to protect the UT operator and that was ->

If in doubt - Knock it out.

Best Regards,
CJ

PS I hope the welders and ECA engineers that I now frequently work with aren't reading in?

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
Dent McIntyre
Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 250

Dent McIntyre

Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
250
03:59 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
I suggest that you post this question on the ASME forum for discussion.
https://cop.asme.org/COP

I agree with the philosophy "if in doubt..cut it out"

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
charlie jackson
Engineering
MBINSPECTION, United Kingdom, Joined Aug 2003, 7

charlie jackson

Engineering
MBINSPECTION,
United Kingdom,
Joined Aug 2003
7
05:04 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
hello
I think you will find that all indications 20% of ref DAC are to be investigated ( ref + 14dB ) if the discons are LOF / Crack they can be classed as defective at this stage and marked for repair. If they are slag then you are allowed the specified amount dependent on thickness ( set at DAC ref ).

Two points to remember which are important are 1 - transfer correction and 2 - there also is a requirement to record all discons within 6dB of the ref DAC.

The important point is that without sufficient gain the interpretation of discons may be flawed.

You can use 6dB on length but will find this flawed when the discon is shorter than the beam ( small defects on thin wall items ) suggest you use 20dB or max amp and give reasoning on the report.

Kind Regards Charlie

Kind Regards Charlie Jackson

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop.But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
General
General
02:47 Dec-01-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
I also agree with the cut it out philosophy but there should still be a correct answer IAW the code.


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I suggest that you post this question on the ASME forum for discussion.
: https://cop.asme.org/COP
: I agree with the philosophy "if in doubt..cut it out"
: : When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: : Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: : If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: : What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

Navic - Steerable Modular Automated Scanner

The Navic is a modular, motorized, steerable scanner designed to carry multiple attachments used
...
in various scanning and inspection applications. The Navic is capable of weld scanning (girth welds and long seam welds), automated corrosion mapping, and tank scanning.
>

IRIS 9000Plus - Introducing the next generation of heat exchanger inspection.

Representing the seventh generation of the IRIS system, the IRIS 9000 Plus has nearly 200 years of c
...
ombined field inspection experience incorporated in its design. This experience combined with a strong commitment to quality and a history of innovation has made Iris Inspection Services® the undisputed leader in IRIS technology.
>

HARDNESS TESTER TKM-459CE combi

TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
...
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window