where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1251 views
Technical Discussions
General
General
01:07 Nov-30-2004
Sizing Defects

When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.

Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?

If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.

What is the correct way?


 
 Reply 
 
Chris Jones
Chris Jones
07:46 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
Hello,

I have not worked on compliance testing for some time and when I did I rarely worked to ASME codes.

However, I do remember one rule that was commonly applied to protect the UT operator and that was ->

If in doubt - Knock it out.

Best Regards,
CJ

PS I hope the welders and ECA engineers that I now frequently work with aren't reading in?

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
Dent McIntyre
Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 250

Dent McIntyre

Consultant, NDE Manager NDELevel III/3
NDT Consultant,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
250
03:59 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
I suggest that you post this question on the ASME forum for discussion.
https://cop.asme.org/COP

I agree with the philosophy "if in doubt..cut it out"

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
charlie jackson
Engineering
MBINSPECTION, United Kingdom, Joined Aug 2003, 7

charlie jackson

Engineering
MBINSPECTION,
United Kingdom,
Joined Aug 2003
7
05:04 Nov-30-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
hello
I think you will find that all indications 20% of ref DAC are to be investigated ( ref + 14dB ) if the discons are LOF / Crack they can be classed as defective at this stage and marked for repair. If they are slag then you are allowed the specified amount dependent on thickness ( set at DAC ref ).

Two points to remember which are important are 1 - transfer correction and 2 - there also is a requirement to record all discons within 6dB of the ref DAC.

The important point is that without sufficient gain the interpretation of discons may be flawed.

You can use 6dB on length but will find this flawed when the discon is shorter than the beam ( small defects on thin wall items ) suggest you use 20dB or max amp and give reasoning on the report.

Kind Regards Charlie

Kind Regards Charlie Jackson

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop.But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
General
General
02:47 Dec-01-2004
Re: Sizing Defects
I also agree with the cut it out philosophy but there should still be a correct answer IAW the code.


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I suggest that you post this question on the ASME forum for discussion.
: https://cop.asme.org/COP
: I agree with the philosophy "if in doubt..cut it out"
: : When sizing a defect according to ASME you take the maximum amplitude and then get the length ccording to the 6 db drop. But according to ASME it has to be over DAC and a certain length to be rejectable, so I have a question about determing length.
: : Do you only consider the signal portion for length if it goes over DAC, ie; I maximize on my signal and it is over DAC (but not by much), I move laterally to determine length by 6 db drop but before I get to the 6db drop location the signal is now below DAC. SO do you only consider the part of the indication that goes above DAC for determining length or is it 6db drop regardless?
: : If I size by the 6db drop it may exceed length by code and be rejectable but if i size with the portion that is above DAC it may be acceptable. I can see arguments for both ways.
: : What is the correct way?
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

TESTD-PT SYSTEM

Pulse thermography is a non-contact test method that is ideal for the characterization of thin fil
...
ms and coatings or the detection of defects. With a remarquable short test time and a high detection sensitivity, the Telops TESTD-PT is the perfect tool for non- destructive testing. With such high frame rates, it is even possible to investigate highly conductive or diffusive materials.
>

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

A1525 SOLO

A1525 Solo – the most compact and affordable TMF unit with two phased array transducers and 3D v
...
isualization and analysis software in standard delivery set. A compact, ergonomic and easy to handheld Phased Array unit based on Total Focusing Method for easy-going imaging of inspection objects with two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization and evaluation of inspection results.
>

Combination of Digital Image Correlation and Thermographic Measurements

The combination of measuring results from the digital image correlation (ARAMIS, DIC) and temperat
...
ure measuring data from infrared cameras permits the simultaneous analysis of the thermal and mechanical behavior of test specimens in the materials and components testing field.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window