where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1282 views
Technical Discussions
Dipl.-Ing. Martin Heinz
Dipl.-Ing. Martin Heinz
09:40 May-11-1999
Standards for Testing Ultrasonic Transducers

Up to now we used our own testing methods. Because thus the values are not good comparable I`m searching
for standarized testing methods for our ultrasonic transducers.
Who know standards (e. g. ASTM, which number?), which describes testing methods for the specification of
ultrasonic transducers? I`m searching for standardized methods for the determination of:
- Sensitivity (e. g. P/E-measurement, which reflector distance?, what driving signal (burst with how many cycles or pulse...)
- Pulse width (How must the driving pulse be specified for a standard measurement?)
- Bandwidth (Is in the standard method a pulse measurement with Fourier transformation used, or is a sweeped CW signal used?)



 
 Reply 
 
Tom Nelligan
Engineering,
retired, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 390

Tom Nelligan

Engineering,
retired,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
390
01:15 May-11-1999
Re: Standards for Testing Ultrasonic Transducers

: Up to now we used our own testing methods. Because thus the values are not good comparable I`m searching
: for standarized testing methods for our ultrasonic transducers.
: Who know standards (e. g. ASTM, which number?), which describes testing methods for the specification of
: ultrasonic transducers? I`m searching for standardized methods for the determination of:
: - Sensitivity (e. g. P/E-measurement, which reflector distance?, what driving signal (burst with how many cycles or pulse...)
: - Pulse width (How must the driving pulse be specified for a standard measurement?)
: - Bandwidth (Is in the standard method a pulse measurement with Fourier transformation used, or is a sweeped CW signal used?)

You should obtain a copy of ASTM E 1065-96, "Standard Guide for Evaluating Characteristics of Ultrasonic Search Units". It is fairly detailed, and seems to be generally recognized as a good standard for NDT transducer qualification.

--Tom Nelligan
Senior Applications Engineer


 
 Reply 
 
Rolf D.
Director,
NDT.net, Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 609

Rolf D.

Director,
NDT.net,
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
609
01:47 May-11-1999
Re: Standards for Testing Ultrasonic Transducers
al Committee
CEN/TC 138 "Non-destructive testing" of which the secretariat is held by AFNOR.

This document is currently submitted to the formal vote.

This standard consists of the following parts:
EN 12668-1, Non-destructive testing and verification of ultrasonic
examination equipment - Part 1: Instruments
EN 12668-2, Non-destructive testing - Characterization and
verification of ultrasonic examination equipment - Part 2: Probes
EN 12668-3, Non-destructive testing - Characterization and
verification of ultrasonic examination equipment - Part 3: Combined
equipment


Rolf Diederichs



 
 Reply 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1286

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1286
06:29 May-16-1999
Re: Standards for Testing Ultrasonic Transducers
In addition to the references by Tom & Rolf DIN 25 450
is a good and comprehensive Code.
Also see:
AFNOR A09-323
JIS Z 2352
ESI-98-9
BS 4331

Ed


: Up to now we used our own testing methods. Because thus the values are not good comparable I`m searching
: for standarized testing methods for our ultrasonic transducers.
: Who know standards (e. g. ASTM, which number?), which describes testing methods for the specification of
: ultrasonic transducers? I`m searching for standardized methods for the determination of:
: - Sensitivity (e. g. P/E-measurement, which reflector distance?, what driving signal (burst with how many cycles or pulse...)
: - Pulse width (How must the driving pulse be specified for a standard measurement?)
: - Bandwidth (Is in the standard method a pulse measurement with Fourier transformation used, or is a sweeped CW signal used?)




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

High-end Ultrasonic Flaw Detector with 32:128PR PAUT and 2-ch TOFD: SyncScan 2

SIUI’s newly launched SyncScan 2, is a high-end ultrasonic flaw detector with 32:128PR PAUT and
...
2-ch TOFD, which can maximize your efficiency for PA and TOFD. ● Support PA/TOFD/UT ● 32-ch PA is more suitable for inspection on extra-thick wall and high-attenuation material. ● 32-ch PA and 2-ch TOFD work simultaneously. ● Support PR mode for corrosion inspection.
>

NEW! The PragmaPro Instrument Platform

The PragmaPro is based on a modular cartridge technology and supports various NDT instrument modal
...
ities such as UT, PAUT, ECT and many more. This new platform is based on a machined, powder-coated aluminum frame for shock-proofness, best sealing qualities and maximum heat dissipation. This is practical to extend the outdoor temperature range and/or to extend the power injected in the transducers. The PragmaPro is aiming at a very wide range of applications, such as weld scanning, corrosion mapping and composite testing.
>

Lyft™: Pulsed Eddy Current Reinvented

PEC Reinvented—CUI Programs Redefined Corrosion under insulation (CUI) is possibly the greatest u
...
nresolved asset integrity problem in the industry. Current methods for measuring wall thickness with liftoff, without removing insulation, all have severe limitations. Eddyfi introduces Lyft — a reinvented, high-performance pulsed eddy current (PEC) solution. The patent- pending system features a state-of-the-art portable instrument, real- time C-scan imaging, fast data acquisition with grid-mapping and dynamic scanning modes, and flexibility with long cables. It can also scan through thick metal and insulation, as well as aluminum, stainless steel, and galvanized steel weather jackets. Who else but Eddyfi to reinvent an eddy current technique and redefine CUI programs. Got Lyft?
>

PROlineTOP Plug & Play Ultrasonic inspection device

As Plug & Play solution it units all control and operation elements in a small housing and therefo
...
re replaces the typical control cabinet...
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window