where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
8779 views
Technical Discussions
Azhar Jamil
Engineering, NDT Mechanical Engineer
Pakistan, Joined Feb 2005, 3

Azhar Jamil

Engineering, NDT Mechanical Engineer
Pakistan,
Joined Feb 2005
3
04:07 Jun-26-2006
Crack LI

Can anyone differenciate between the crack and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view

regards



 
 Reply 
 
JohnD
JohnD
05:48 Jun-26-2006
Re: Crack LI
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Can anyone differenciate between the crack and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view
: regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

A linear indication is usually used to describe such indications as Slag or Lack of fusion. If you cannot tell the difference between that and a crack you need to check again.



 
 Reply 
 
frank
frank
05:49 Jun-26-2006
Re: Crack LI
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Can anyone differenciate between the crack and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view
: regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

A crack will usually be jagged and have some thru wall dimension if using UT. A linear indicaton usually does not have a thru wall dimension



 
 Reply 
 
David
David
02:15 Jun-27-2006
Re: Crack LI
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Can anyone differenciate between the crack and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view
: regards
------------ End Original Message ------------

It is my belief that a crack is normally a form of linear indication. I usually define linear as having a length greater than 3 times the width. Interpret firstly into relevant and non relevant, then into rounded, linear, aligned etc, then look for the type of discontinuity - slag, pore, LOF, crack etc. The manufacturing process and part history should help here.
The code or specification should give some guidelines on this. Sometimes it is required to differentiate between types, sometimes just being linear is enough to reject.
Actual techniques of interpretation depend on the NDT method you are using and the product and manufacturing process.


 
 Reply 
 
Ed
Ed
04:47 Jun-27-2006
Re: LI
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Can anyone differenciate between the and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view
: : regards
: It is my belief that a is normally a form of linear indication. I usually define linear as having a length greater than 3 times the width. Interpret firstly into relevant and non relevant, then into rounded, linear, aligned etc, then look for the type of discontinuity - slag, pore, LOF, etc. The manufacturing process and part history should help here.
: The code or specification should give some guidelines on this. Sometimes it is required to differentiate between types, sometimes just being linear is enough to reject.
: Actual techniques of interpretation depend on the NDT method you are using and the product and manufacturing process.
------------ End Original Message ------------

A code will give you a definition and sometimes even illustrations describing flaws. It should also provide acceptance/rejection criteria for them, but it will not give you guidelines on how to differentiate between them.

That is the ultimate responsibility of the end user and comes down to the "experience" of the NDT technician. The technician should be able to pass a practical examination which should include identifying different types of indications.

It is assumed the technician is trained, qualified and certified before he/she performs the examinations independently. In fact, that is usually a code requirement.

Most codes identify cracks as cracks and linear indications as linear indications, or more specifically, slag, LOF, IF, IP, etc. But a crack is always identified as a crack. There is a reason for that. Cracks are the most detrimental type of defects you can have, whereas, linear indications can be accepted, depending on their vertical height and/or length.

That is with the exception of ASME Section XI, which does clearly state "Linear" or "Rounded". The Nuclear industry doesn't like to use the word "crack". ASME Section XI uses height vs. length for acceptance or rejection of flaws using Aspect Ratios, regardless of whether it is a crack or anything else. Length is grater than 3x width. In fact, the only place I have ever seen the work "crack" in Section XI was under Visual Examinations.

However, I do agree, sometimes differentiating can be difficult, a decision must be made. This is true, even if the NDE Level III has to make the decision. After all, the Level III is responsible for the results.

You haven't stated what method you are using. If you are using UT, you have some options. Try confirming it with RT. Alternatively, you could try using ToFD or try vertical sizing of the indication. If you use a notch and increase the dB until you can see the notch tip, you should be able to see a crack tip. Again, this comes down to experience.

I think ToFD is you best bet, though.



 
 Reply 
 
Azhar Jamil
NDT Engineer
Panama, Joined May 2006, 17

Azhar Jamil

NDT Engineer
Panama,
Joined May 2006
17
06:04 Jul-01-2006
Re: Crack LI with Thannks
Dear all,

Thanks for your input and valuable reply on the subject. Basically I am talking about the MPI and LPI
as someon has asked about the NDT Method.

In my opinion (developed during my limited experience in the field of NDT), to differentiate b/w the crack and LI is basically depends upon the inspector's experience and perception who have got the ability to differentiate.

The reason i have floated this basic question is that, if you are discussing with the someone not related to NDT can understand the CRACK easily, but when we find and report LI's then sometimes it is difficult.


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Can anyone differenciate between the crack and the linear indication. Also explain as interpretation point of view
: : regards
: It is my belief that a crack is normally a form of linear indication. I usually define linear as having a length greater than 3 times the width. Interpret firstly into relevant and non relevant, then into rounded, linear, aligned etc, then look for the type of discontinuity - slag, pore, LOF, crack etc. The manufacturing process and part history should help here.
: The code or specification should give some guidelines on this. Sometimes it is required to differentiate between types, sometimes just being linear is enough to reject.
: Actual techniques of interpretation depend on the NDT method you are using and the product and manufacturing process.
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

HARDNESS TESTER TKM-459CE combi

TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
...
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.
>

AIS229 - Multipurpose Real Time System

Latest standard & automatic real time system developed by Balteau. The AIS229 has been designed to
...
do series inspection in a wide variety of industry. Composed of a shielded cabinet, 5 axis manipulator, x-ray generator and tubehead from 160kV to 225kV, a fl at panel & much more, the AIS229 is most certainly one of the most multipurpose RTR system available on the market.
>

Aerospace Systems - Automated Ultrasonic Inspection

USL are specialists in the design and manufacture of turnkey ultrasonic inspection systems for aer
...
ospace applications. From monolithic composites to complex honeycomb structures. This video shows just a few examples of what is possible, find out more at: www.ultrasonic-sciences.co.uk
>

Ultrasonic Testing Immersion Tanks with Unmatched Scanning Features

TecScan’s non-destructive testing Ultrasonic Immersion Tanks & scanners are designed for high pe
...
rformance and demanding NDT testing applications. Our Scan3D™ line of High Precision Immersion Tanks are specifically designed for automated ultrasonic testing of complex composites parts used in aerospace and industrial applications.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window