where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

Hillger Ing. Büro
was founded in 1984 and develops special ultrasonic imaging systems for high-tech materials.

2943 views
Technical Discussions
API Inspector
API Inspector
00:18 Mar-29-2007
API 1104 UT inspection

Does someone has already used a Phased Array UT procedure in lieu of a conventional UT one to comply with API Standard 1104?

As Phased Array system can obviously detect the same defects than a conventional system, would it be possible to use a PA instrument if a Level III does the proof that the procedure is reliable?

Thanks


    
 
 
EM
EM
05:58 Mar-31-2007
Re: API 1104 UT inspection
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Does someone has already used a Phased Array UT procedure in lieu of a conventional UT one to comply with API Standard 1104?
: As Phased Array system can obviously detect the same defects than a conventional system, would it be possible to use a PA instrument if a Level III does the proof that the procedure is reliable?
: Thanks
------------ End Original Message ------------

Phased Array is already used on pipelines all over the world.



    
 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1252

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1252
06:15 Mar-31-2007
Re: API 1104 UT inspection
Phased Array UT has been in use on pipelines around the world for nearly 10 years now. In 1997 PRCI ran a research programme to confirm and demonstrate that phased arrays could perform as well as multiprobe units. With the results of this programme as the foundation, the first construction project using phased array UT systems with the zonal discrimination technique was made by Canspec and OIS in 1999 on the Maritime Northeast Pipeline. Since then the concepts have been used world wide. Presently there are nearly 100 phased array systems being used on pipeline construction.
Regards
Ed

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Does someone has already used a Phased Array UT procedure in lieu of a conventional UT one to comply with API Standard 1104?
: As Phased Array system can obviously detect the same defects than a conventional system, would it be possible to use a PA instrument if a Level III does the proof that the procedure is reliable?
: Thanks
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
API Inspector
API Inspector
04:45 Apr-02-2007
Re: API 1104 UT inspection
Thank you for your answer,

What is surprising me, is that even thought Phased Array is widely used since the last decade, there is no clear mention of phased array (PA) in the API 1104 edited in 2005! According to your anwser, it seems evidence that PA can be used and the demonstration has been done with the PRCI. Should I understand that we can use PA in lieu of conventional UT without restriction if a procedure is done by a level III?

Regards


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Phased Array UT has been in use on pipelines around the world for nearly 10 years now. In 1997 PRCI ran a research programme to confirm and demonstrate that phased arrays could perform as well as multiprobe units. With the results of this programme as the foundation, the first construction project using phased array UT systems with the zonal discrimination technique was made by Canspec and OIS in 1999 on the Maritime Northeast Pipeline. Since then the concepts have been used world wide. Presently there are nearly 100 phased array systems being used on pipeline construction.
: Regards
: Ed
: : Does someone has already used a Phased Array UT procedure in lieu of a conventional UT one to comply with API Standard 1104?
: : As Phased Array system can obviously detect the same defects than a conventional system, would it be possible to use a PA instrument if a Level III does the proof that the procedure is reliable?
: : Thanks
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
John O'Brien
Consultant, -
Chevron ETC , USA, Joined Jan 2000, 278

John O'Brien

Consultant, -
Chevron ETC ,
USA,
Joined Jan 2000
278
02:08 Apr-02-2007
Re: API 1104 UT inspection
API 1104 like many other standards is concerned about setting essential minimum control paarameters not promoting specific technologies. If you read 1104 closely it is about minimum requirements to ensure performance and then determine a fcator for inspection error to be used in ECA calculations. It is this lack of detail that has led to the zonal ASTM document and other AUT qualification exercises such as those outlined in DNV FS 101.

You must also consider the application whilst one level of performance may be acceptable for pipelines and flowlines it may not be acceptable for fatigue sensitive sections such as SCR risers or offshore oil loading lines (OOL).

Whilst Phased Array as well as zonal techniques have been widely used around the world as correctly discussed by others it does not automatically follow that they will be able to perform to your specific required criteria.

The codes are about ensuring you understand the performance limitations of the proposed technique and its relationship to your detection, sizing and acceptance criteria.

Qualify your techniques should be your approach.


    
 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1252

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1252
05:01 Apr-06-2007
Re: API 1104 UT inspection
Zigmut:
API 1104, in the 19th edition, made several changes to the UT Inspection section (11.4). But as John O'Brien pointed out, you have to consider the application requirements and select (and demonstrate) the method you choose.
That being said, I see you have simply asked if phased array options can be used in lieu of "conventional" UT. If conventional (single or multiprobe) UT was appropriate and could be demonstrated successfully there is no reason to doubt that a phased array option could probably do a similar job.

But API 1104 is a very general Standard. You will note that it applies to both construction and in-service applications. The zonal method used in construction (by both conventional multi-probe and phased array systems) was developed to provide a very rapid method of data collection and analysis to keep up with the automated welding production rates (typically 5 minutes per weld).

If this is not the application you are looking at then options other than the zonal discrimination method may be suitable and adequately demonstrated in accord with API 1104, Section 11.4.4.

Regards
Ed

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Thank you for your answer,
: What is surprising me, is that even thought Phased Array is widely used since the last decade, there is no clear mention of phased array (PA) in the API 1104 edited in 2005! According to your anwser, it seems evidence that PA can be used and the demonstration has been done with the PRCI. Should I understand that we can use PA in lieu of conventional UT without restriction if a procedure is done by a level III?
: Regards
:
: : Phased Array UT has been in use on pipelines around the world for nearly 10 years now. In 1997 PRCI ran a research programme to confirm and demonstrate that phased arrays could perform as well as multiprobe units. With the results of this programme as the foundation, the first construction project using phased array UT systems with the zonal discrimination technique was made by Canspec and OIS in 1999 on the Maritime Northeast Pipeline. Since then the concepts have been used world wide. Presently there are nearly 100 phased array systems being used on pipeline construction.
: : Regards
: : Ed
: : : Does someone has already used a Phased Array UT procedure in lieu of a conventional UT one to comply with API Standard 1104?
: : : As Phased Array system can obviously detect the same defects than a conventional system, would it be possible to use a PA instrument if a Level III does the proof that the procedure is reliable?
: : : Thanks
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 

Product Spotlight

TESTD-PT SYSTEM

Pulse thermography is a non-contact test method that is ideal for the characterization of thin fil
...
ms and coatings or the detection of defects. With a remarquable short test time and a high detection sensitivity, the Telops TESTD-PT is the perfect tool for non- destructive testing. With such high frame rates, it is even possible to investigate highly conductive or diffusive materials.
>

IRIS 9000Plus - Introducing the next generation of heat exchanger inspection.

Representing the seventh generation of the IRIS system, the IRIS 9000 Plus has nearly 200 years of c
...
ombined field inspection experience incorporated in its design. This experience combined with a strong commitment to quality and a history of innovation has made Iris Inspection Services® the undisputed leader in IRIS technology.
>

Semi-Automated Phased Array Immersion System for Small Composite Parts

Turn-key semi-automated system as an improved and affordable solution for inspection of small comp
...
osite parts. Includes support table, immersion tank, scanner, PA instrument, PC, Analysis software, database, wedge management and other options.
>

Alpha Pro Digital Radiography System

The Alpha Pro digital X-ray system is the ideal system for your NDT \r\nneeds, as it offers amazin
...
g 16 bit images which enable the highest \r\nlevel of detection and identification of hairline cracks. While weighing only 3kg (6.6lbs), this panel has the largest imaging area: 35 X 43 cm (14X17 in).
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window