where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

2339 views
Technical Discussions
azmi
azmi
01:21 Jul-04-2007
UT after MT. Surface preparation

Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.


    
 
 
chris s
chris s
08:00 Jul-06-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
------------ End Original Message ------------

that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.


    
 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
06:33 Jul-11-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.


----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
chris s
chris s
00:18 Jul-12-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
:
: : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What imean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
------------ End Original Message ------------

i did not see any mention of a paint coating



    
 
 
Nigel Armstrong
Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom, Joined Oct 2000, 1096

Nigel Armstrong

Engineering, - Specialist services
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 2000
1096
05:33 Jul-13-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
chris

If a fluorescent technique not requiring a contrast paint coating is required, then surface condition is even more critical. In nearly all other cases a contrast paint coat is required.

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
: :
: : : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
: i did not see any mention of a paint coating
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
chris s
chris s
08:09 Jul-17-2007
Re: UT after MT. Surface preparation
----------- Start Original Message -----------
are you talking about a developer?

: chris
: If a fluorescent technique not requiring a contrast paint coating is required, then surface condition is even more critical. In nearly all other cases a contrast paint coat is required.
: : : It depends on the overall condition of the scan surface(s). If such surfaces were very clean, smooth and free of spatter and other surface irregularities, then the MPI technician will only have needed to apply a very fine and even thickness contrast coating prior to MPI. This would make UT on the painted surface possible if the contast coat is tightly adhering and very thin. However if the surface condition was poor at the time of MPI, then you can expect a much thicker, less even thickness coating - MOPI techs tend to spray contrast coating until it looks a good smooth finish. My general advice would be to power brush the scanning surfaces prior to MPI because this allows the technician(s) more control over both the MPI (thinner more even coating) and the UT ( better probe coupling and manipulation) leading to a higher probability of detection of defects.
: : :
: : : : : Does it enough to perform UT after MT with manual cleaning on surface after MT? What i mean, UT still can be performed eventhough the weld surface is not cleaned by power brush.
: : : : that should be fine. you will have problems if you ut and then mag. the ut gel will need to be completely removed.
: : i did not see any mention of a paint coating
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 

Product Spotlight

TOPAZ® 64: Fully Integrated Portable 64 Channel PAUT Instrument with FMC & TFM

Introducing TOPAZ64, the industry’s most intelligent fully integrated, portable 64-channel phased
...
array ultrasound (UT) instrument. TOPAZ64 combines code-compliant phased array UT with the industry’s most advanced full matrix capture (FMC) and total focusing method (TFM) capabilities. Featuring the highest acquisition frequency in its class, high resolution FMC and a 12” multi-touchscreen, users can easily visualize even the smallest flaws. TOPAZ64 can generate a bipolar pulse that provides more acoustic energy versus previous models for punching through thick components. The result is a portable tool that delivers increased inspection coverage, more accurate signals, and the ability to handle all UT inspections in one package. TOPAZ64 is ideal for challenging applications in transportation, oil and gas, manufacturing and power generation.
>

FAAST-PA! OEM Patented phased Array for high speed UT inspection

Multiangle, Multifocus, Multifrequency, Multibeam. Instead of stacking UT electronics and having m
...
any PA probes, FAAST-PA is able to transmit all delay laws within ONE single shot in Real time.
>

Echomac® PA Rail Wheel Tester

MAC introduces two versions of Rail Wheel Testers using ECHOMAC® PA platform based on customer requ
...
irements.
>

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window