where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

Iris Inspection Services, Inc.
We are the world's largest supplier of air cooler, boiler and exchanger tubing inspection services.

890 views
Technical Discussions
Yung-how wu
Yung-how wu
09:42 Jul-13-2007
CHIME technique

Recently, when I reviewed the paper of CHIME published at http://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt98/chemical/103/103.htm, I was confused by some description of the technique .

According to the paper, the second part of wave train, which signal amplitudes are higher than the first part, came from direct reflections of bulk wave in different multiple skips. The paper didn't clearly describe what the bulk wave is but just mentioned that there were waves "generated below or above the critical angle due to the beam divergence of a finite width transducer." I assumed it the shear wave, but not Head wave, accompanied with the 90 degree Longitudinal wave of the Creeping wave probe.

Since the latter part of wave train are higher in amplitude, it seemed more useful and reliable than the first part of wave train come from Creeping/Head wave combinations. In this case, I will have wave train similar with the second part if I used a conventional shear wave probe of same incident angle.

Then, my question is:
What isthe benifit of CHIME technique though the paper did also mention that "the Head waves are non-divergent plane waves therefore they have little decay and show strong peaks in the latter half of the signal."

Can anyone answer and confirm if the second part of the wavetrain in CHIME are generated by the shear wave generated by creeping probe and, is similar with conventional shear probe.



    
 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1219

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1219
05:33 Jul-13-2007
Re: CHIME technique

Mr. Wu, you asked if anyone can confirm if the second part of the wavetrain in CHIME are generated by the shear wave generated by creeping probe and, is similar with conventional shear probe.
The image in Figure 1 of the referenced paper shows the 2 arcs that are the main features of the bulk shear wave and how they are connected to the surface-glancing compression wave by the shear headwave. However, the image in that Figure 1 seems to give the impression that the headwave has a very strong amplitude. I have attached a photo from a photoelastic imaging of a so-called creeping wave probe. This illustrates the same modes as predicted by the finite element modelling that was used to image the Figure 1 in the referenced article. But this photo shows the headwave to be weaker than the bulk shear wave. This seems to make sense when we follow the transmission coeeficient curves for the shear mode. These indicate a higher transmission just after the critical angle.
However, the shear bulk wave is divergent (follows Snell's Law and spreads spherically) whereas the headwave from a flat plane surface is forming continuous plane wavefront. This ensures a full volume coverage in the early part of the soundpath whereas the spherical bulk shearwave will have reduced volume coverage in the same region.
The effect of a multiskip shear mode will be "similar" in that multiple arrivals will be seen (some of these from mode conversions).

Regards
Ed

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Recently, when I reviewed the paper of CHIME published at http://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt98/chemical/103/103.htm, I was confused by some description of the technique .
: According to the paper, the second part of wave train, which signal amplitudes are higher than the first part, came from direct reflections of bulk wave in different multiple skips. The paper didn't clearly describe what the bulk wave is but just mentioned that there were waves "generated below or above the critical angle due to the beam divergence of a finite width transducer." I assumed it the shear wave, but not Head wave, accompanied with the 90 degree Longitudinal wave of the Creeping wave probe.
: Since the latter part of wave train are higher in amplitude, it seemed more useful and reliable than the first part of wave train come from Creeping/Head wave combinations. In this case, I will have wave train similar with the second part if I used a conventional shear wave probe of same incident angle.
: Then, my question is:
: What is the benifit of CHIME technique though the paper did also mention that "the Head waves are non-divergent plane waves therefore they have little decay and show strong peaks in the latter half of the signal."
: Can anyone answer and confirm if the second part of the wavetrain in CHIME are generated by the shear wave generated by creeping probe and, is similar with conventional shear probe.
:
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 

Product Spotlight

NovaScope 6000

The all-digital Novascope 6000 is a portable, ultra-high precision thickness gauge for high-speed
...
thickness measurement. Novascope 6000 has unmatched capabilities and unique features including: •Superior Resolution with high contrast, high-speed color RF display •High pulser voltage •Real-time video output •Increased internal/external data storage •Programmable SetUp features •Battery & AC Powered
>

AMIGO2

TSC Amigo2 - ACFM technology has developed a solid reputation for accurately detecting and sizing
...
surface-breaking cracks through paint and coatings. As the industry demands increased performance in speed, signal quality, and portability, it’s time for an evolution. It’s time for Amigo2.
>

Magnetic X-Ray Pipeline Crawler

Zhong Yi brand pipeline crawler is magnetic/micro-video controlled crawler with DC X ray unit inst
...
alled for checking welding of pipeline. Move steadily inside the pipeline 6''-60''diameter with speed of up to 18m/min, Max. moving diatance 5 kilometers and provide the efficient inspection of the pipeline.
>

SONOAIR - air-coupled Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection System

For highly attenuating materials, the performance of the system is critical. The ultrasonic sensors,
...
the scanning area and the system settings should be flexibly adapted to the test task and the material. These high expectations are met with the new and modular testing system SONOAIR. With the world’s first air-coupled phased-array UT inspection system SONOAIR we developed a technology that works with up to 4 transmitter and receiver channels with freely configurable square wave burst transmitters as wells as low noise receiving amplifiers.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window
s