where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

PBP Optel sp. z o.o.
Weare searching new ways - in ultrasonic techniques- in creation of new productsUltrasonic instruments - Ultrasonic Testing Card

1218 views
Technical Discussions
Niles Stenmark
Niles Stenmark
02:27 Dec-03-1999
NDE of Plastics

I am currently a graduate student at UW-Milwaukee. I am working
on the determination of Young's modulus for polyester/particulate
composites from ultrasonic shear and longitudinal velocities. I then take
my samples and determine Young's modulus by compression testing.
My data suggests strongly that Young's modulus determined from
NDE is about double the value obtained from compression testing.
A team and myself have thoroughly checked over the calculations for
error. Is this common in plastics? Is there any explanation for
the data variations?


    
 
 
Chris Edwards
Chris Edwards
02:23 Dec-04-1999
Re: NDE of Plastics
: I am currently a graduate student at UW-Milwaukee. I am working
: on the determination of Young's modulus for polyester/particulate
: composites from ultrasonic shear and longitudinal velocities. I then take
: my samples and determine Young's modulus by compression testing.
: My data suggests strongly that Young's modulus determined from
: NDE is about double the value obtained from compression testing.
: A team and myself have thoroughly checked over the calculations for
: error. Is this common in plastics? Is there any explanation for
: the data variations?

Many plastics are viscoelastic ie soft at low stain rates but harder at high stain rates.
Young modulus determined by a compression test is low frequency ie soft.
Whereas Youngs Modulus determined ultrasonically (high frequency)will be higher as the material appears stiffer.


    
 
 
Valliyappan David Natarajan
Student, Research Assistant
National University of Malaysia, Malaysia, Joined Jan 2000, 4

Valliyappan David Natarajan

Student, Research Assistant
National University of Malaysia,
Malaysia,
Joined Jan 2000
4
05:57 Jan-31-2000
Re: NDE of Plastics
: I am currently a graduate student at UW-Milwaukee. I am working
: on the determination of Young's modulus for polyester/particulate
: composites from ultrasonic shear and longitudinal velocities. I then take
: my samples and determine Young's modulus by compression testing.
: My data suggests strongly that Young's modulus determined from
: NDE is about double the value obtained from compression testing.
: A team and myself have thoroughly checked over the calculations for
: error. Is this common in plastics? Is there any explanation for
: the data variations?

Mr.Niles Stenmark,

I am a graduate from the National University of Malaysia,currently pursuing
my Masters's degree from the same university.
My undergraduate final year project entitled "Characterization of Natural Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites using
Non-Destructive Ultrasonic Technique" involves determination of the Young Modulus and Shear Modulus
of oil palm frond short fiber reinforced polyester from the ultrasonic longitudinal
velocity and correlating it with the same quantities obtained from conventional tensile test (ASTM D638M).
As your observation too, the results which I got strongly shows this correlation :

NDE value = 2 * TensileTest value [ or a correlation of 100% ].

Thereabout, I suggest that some mathematical modification to be made to the
equations presented by the ASTM D638M standard to enhance the approximation
values given by NDE method so as to validate the NDE method. Maybe the mathematical
equations presented in the ASTM D638M was validated only for metals and not specific
for reinforced polymers.

Please inform me if there is any efforts that you have taken in order to justify
your results (ie. the difference between NDE and compression test methods and results).
Thank you.
email : valli_3@hotmail.com




    
 
 
John A. Brunk
Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 158

John A. Brunk

Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
158
07:20 Jan-31-2000
Re: NDE of Plastics
The mechanical properties of many plastics and composites are strain rate sensitive. There may also be significant differences between properties measured in compression,tension, and shear. Many composites are anisotropic.
2 does seem to be a reasonable correction factor for many materials. When you want to compare the mechanical properties of samples of essentially the same material, it may be sufficient to perform the actual mechanical testing on one of the samples to determine the correlation between this data and ultrasonic velocity.
Some composites exhibit different ultrasonic velocities at different frequencies as well as in different directions. It is much easier and more reliable to compare the impact of some processing variable on the properties of one material than to try to generalize about a group of materials.


    
 
 
John A. Brunk
Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 158

John A. Brunk

Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
158
07:22 Jan-31-2000
Re: NDE of Plastics
The mechanical properties of many plastics and composites are strain rate sensitive. There may also be significant differences between properties measured in compression,tension, and shear. Many composites are anisotropic.
2 does seem to be a reasonable correction factor for many materials. When you want to compare the mechanical properties of samples of essentially the same material, it may be sufficient to perform the actual mechanical testing on one of the samples to determine the correlation between this data and ultrasonic velocity.
Some composites exhibit different ultrasonic velocities at different frequencies as well as in different directions. It is much easier and more reliable to compare the impact of some processing variable on the properties of one material than to try to generalize about a group of materials.


    
 
 
Damir
Damir
09:55 Feb-01-2000
Re: NDE of Plastics
ptly for ASTM and:
http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/PAGES/D638M.htm?L+mystore+ceqx4960
(Withdrawn 1998)
I suppose nothing at all with standard modification, but I am very curious on
the content of this standard. Could you please send me a copy.

regards,
D.Markucic



    
 
 
Damir Markucic
Teacher, R&D
Faculty of Mechanical Eng., University of Zagreb, Croatia, Joined Nov 1998, 5

Damir Markucic

Teacher, R&D
Faculty of Mechanical Eng., University of Zagreb,
Croatia,
Joined Nov 1998
5
00:18 Feb-01-2000
Re: NDE of Plastics



    
 
 

Product Spotlight

SITEX CPSERIES

Teledyne ICM’s CPSERIES has been designed with a view to revolutionizing the handling and perfor
...
mances of portable X-Ray sets. Despite having managed to halve the weight of similar portable X-Ray generators available on the market (while continuing to provide the same power output), the SITEX CPSERIES generators feature a shutter, a laser pointer, a beryllium window, an aluminum filter and two integrated diaphragms (customized sizes are available upon request). Without compromising the robustness and reliability for which ICM products are renowned, the small size and light weight of the SITEX CPSERIES will radically change the way that you perform your RT inspections. And you will see a positive impact in terms of both quality and return on investment (ROI).
>

Varex Imaging Large Field of View (FOV) Digital Detector Arrays (DDAs)

A larger FOV DDA can reduce the space and volume of the X-ray inspection system on the factory floor
...
, enable faster scanning times, better throughput and better resolution images at a lower dose. Customers can also save time and money. With these benefits in mind, Varex Imaging has designed a family of large FOV detectors (4343HE, XRD 1611, 4343DX-I, 4343CT) for our industrial imaging customers.
>

MUSE Mobile Ultrasonic Equipment

The MUSE, a portable ultrasonic imaging system, was developed for in-field inspections of light-weig
...
ht structures. The MUSE consists of a motor-driven manipulator, a water circulation system for the acoustic coupling and a portable ultrasonic flaw detector (USPC 3010). The MUSE provides images of internal defects (A-, B-,C- and D-scan).
>

Cygnus 6+ PRO Multi-Mode Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge

The Cygnus 6+ PRO thickness gauge is the most advance gauge within the Cygnus range with key featu
...
res including: comprehensive data logging; A-scan and B-scan display; manual gain control; Bluetooth connectivity; and much more. With its unique dual display and three measuring modes (Multiple-Echo, Echo-Echo and Single-Echo), this surface thickness gauge offers maximum versatility for inspections.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window