Consultant, AUT specialist
FREELANCE, India, Joined Aug 2008, 63
PHASED ARRAY EFFECTIVENESS
We paln to buy a PA equipment with 16:64 or 16:128 configurations for using in a production (GAS) platform offshore for corrosion analysis of equipments as well as thickness readings in piping. Can some one advise the PA system's effectiveness or is it worth to buy a PA system for this purpose?wHAT PROBES WE NEED TO DO CORROSION MAPPING ?Do we need TOFD scanner also?
|Michael Moles †2014 *1948|
, Joined ,
Re: PHASED ARRAY EFFECTIVENESS ----------- Start Original Message -----------
: We paln to buy a PA equipment with 16:64 or 16:128 configurations for using in a production (GAS) platform offshore for corrosion analysis of equipments as well as thickness readings in piping. Can some one advise the PA system's effectiveness or is it worth to buy a PA system for this purpose?wHAT PROBES WE NEED TO DO CORROSION MAPPING ?Do we need TOFD scanner also?
------------ End Original Message ------------
As always in phased arrays, the best probe depends on your specific application. If you are looking for large area coverage in a short time, you could use a 128 element array. The problems with this array are largely from coupling; the array is long, and maintaining coupling may be difficult. You will also need to use a wedge to minimize wear on the probe face, and for a delay line. Normally, we recommend pumping water as the couplant (an aquarium pump normally will do), since it is more difficult to get consistent coupling with smeared-on couplant. However, the ultrasonic coverage is not so good as with smaller arrays with smaller elements.
If you have a particularly rough surface, a smaller array may work better. Also, if you are looking for very small defects, e.g. pinhole corrosion, you may be better off with a smaller array, e.g. 64 elements (also with wedge/delay line) to give you a better pulse density. This assumes that the material is OK for ultrasonics, e.g. carbon steel, not some exotic material.
So, there is no simple answer, but it depends on your surface, the component for access, the speed of scanning required, and the defects. Hope this helps, and keep in touch.
As for a TOFD scanner, maybe and maybe not. It depends on your defects and component. if you want rapid area scanning, TOFD is OK, but you will probably get better and easier analysis using PA. I would try PA first.
High-end Ultrasonic Flaw Detector with 32:128PR PAUT and 2-ch TOFD: SyncScan 2
SIUI’s newly launched SyncScan 2, is a high-end ultrasonic flaw
detector with 32:128PR PAUT and
2-ch TOFD, which can maximize your
efficiency for PA and TOFD.
● Support PA/TOFD/UT
● 32-ch PA is more suitable for inspection on extra-thick wall and
● 32-ch PA and 2-ch TOFD work simultaneously.
● Support PR mode for corrosion inspection.
iProbe - USB Phased Array Probe
Turn your PC, Laptop or Tablet into a powerful 32:64 Phased Array system with our USB
ed Array iProbe and inspection software package. Perform affordable weld
inspection and corrosion mapping inspections with this powerful but small system. The probe
has a 100V pulser, 8K PRF, dual axis encoder input and achieves outstanding signal quality.
EKOSCAN Phased Array
In order to always fit your needs, EKOSCAN can manufacture any type of UT transducer, either convent
ional or Phased Array.
As an ISO 9001: 2015 certified company, EKOSCAN is extremely careful as far a material selection and manufacturing processes are concerned. Our probes guarantee our customers the benefits of latest innovations regarding piezo-composite, backing, impedance adaptation layer, etc.
Specific probes for hostile environment: high temperature, high pressure, corrosive environment,etc.
Specific probes designed to fit your specific application: optimization of every parameter to guarantee you the best detection.