where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1217 views
Technical Discussions
MihaiC
MihaiC
00:23 Jan-11-2008
EC inspection of welds

Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?



 
 Reply 
 
MihaiC
MihaiC
08:53 Jan-12-2008
Re: eddy current inspection of welds
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
: Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?
------------ End Original Message ------------


Everybody HELP!
We need to inspect by EC a great length of butt-weld and we really need to evaluate the time periode requested for this operation,
There is someone with experience in the field?
Thank you,


 
 Reply 
 
Joe Buckley
Consultant, ASNT L-III, Honorary Secretary of BINDT
Level X NDT, BINDT, United Kingdom, Joined Oct 1999, 524

Joe Buckley

Consultant, ASNT L-III, Honorary Secretary of BINDT
Level X NDT, BINDT,
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 1999
524
01:31 Jan-13-2008
Re: eddy current inspection of welds
Having only approached this from the equipment manufacturing side I would not want to be the one to suggest numbers. What you get will depend on a lot of factors, particular the surface condition of the weld, and of course the size of defect you are looking for.

I would stongly suggested getting equipment vendors involvd and commissioning some serious trials.

One point worth making is that If you are looking at Electromagnetic Inspection of welds, and if the speed is critical to the point that the relatively higher purchase cost of the ACFM equipment is less important, you should probably be comparing both standard eddy current, and ACFM methods.

Joe

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: : Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
: : Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?
:
: Everybody HELP!
: We need to inspect by EC a great length of butt-weld and we really need to evaluate the time periode requested for this operation,
: There is someone with experience in the field?
: Thank you,
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
MihaiC
MihaiC
00:47 Jan-14-2008
Re: eddy current inspection of welds
Joe,
First, thank you very much for answer.
The problem is that we really don’t have time for testing different technical approaches. We only have two options: remove the paint coating and perform magnetic particles testing or use eddy current and save time and money.
From my knowledge, the eddy current option is a faster and cheaper solution than MT – we are specking about weld covered by special protective painting.
The single piece of supplementary information is that the weld are manually done, not automated.
I am aware that there are several factors that influence the speed of the inspection but I need the average production rate accepted in the industry. The tested piece, the equipment and the experience of the operator will always induce variations… but I still need to have at least an idea about this problem.

Thank you,

MihaiC

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Having only approached this from the equipment manufacturing side I would not want to be the one to suggest numbers. What you get will depend on a lot of factors, particular the surface condition of the weld, and of course the size of defect you are looking for.
: I would stongly suggested getting equipment vendors involvd and commissioning some serious trials.
: One point worth making is that If you are looking at Electromagnetic Inspection of welds, and if the speed is critical to the point that the relatively higher purchase cost of the ACFM equipment is less important, you should probably be comparing both standard eddy current, and ACFM methods.
: Joe
: : : Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
: : : Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?
: :
: : Everybody HELP!
: : We need to inspect by EC a great length of butt-weld and we really need to evaluate the time periode requestedfor this operation,
: : There is someone with experience in the field?
: : Thank you,
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 
Martin Lugg
Consultant,
TSC Inspection Systems, United Kingdom, Joined Nov 2000, 27

Martin Lugg

Consultant,
TSC Inspection Systems,
United Kingdom,
Joined Nov 2000
27
01:48 Jan-14-2008
Re: eddy current inspection of welds
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Joe,
: First, thank you very much for answer.
: The problem is that we really don’t have time for testing different technical approaches. We only have two options: remove the paint coating and perform magnetic particles testing or use eddy current and save time and money.
: From my knowledge, the eddy current option is a faster and cheaper solution than MT – we are specking about weld covered by special protective painting.
: The single piece of supplementary information is that the weld are manually done, not automated.
: I am aware that there are several factors that influence the speed of the inspection but I need the average production rate accepted in the industry. The tested piece, the equipment and the experience of the operator will always induce variations… but I still need to have at least an idea about this problem.
: Thank you,
: MihaiC
: : Having only approached this from the equipment manufacturing side I would not want to be the one to suggest numbers. What you get will depend on a lot of factors, particular the surface condition of the weld, and of course the size of defect you are looking for.
: : I would stongly suggested getting equipment vendors involvd and commissioning some serious trials.
: : One point worth making is that If you are looking at Electromagnetic Inspection of welds, and if the speed is critical to the point that the relatively higher purchase cost of the ACFM equipment is less important, you should probably be comparing both standard eddy current, and ACFM methods.
: : Joe
: : : : Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
: : : : Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?
: : :
: : : Everybody HELP!
: : : We need to inspect by EC a great length of butt-weld and we really need to evaluate the time periode requested for this operation,
: : : There is someone with experience in the field?
: : : Thank you,
------------ End Original Message ------------

MihaiC,
I am also approaching this as a manufacturer (of ACFM equipment mentioned by Joe). We have a typical recommended scanning speed of 100mm/sec for manual deployment, but this will only give an upper limit to the true inspection rate.
This rate should be provided by users, but since no users seem to be replying to you, I can tell you that one user (Apave in France) reported an inspection rate of 100m/hour on coated lap and butt welds on steel storage tanks, after setting up special deployment methods and some practice. They subsequently increased this rate by using advanced array probes, but obviously this increases the cost. Hope that is some help.


 
 Reply 
 
John Brunk
Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time, USA, Joined Oct 1999, 161

John Brunk

Engineering, NDT Level III
Self employed, part-time,
USA,
Joined Oct 1999
161
06:55 Jan-14-2008
Re: eddy current inspection of welds
You need to determine that the proposed test is really effective before thinking about how long it will take to do it. Variations in magnetic permeability between base metal, heat-affected zone and filler metal can produce some crazy signals, and may vary with the filler metal and welding process. It is often necessary to test under conditions of magnetic saturation, and limits the test to surface and very near-surface discontinuiities.

---------- Start Original Message -----------
: Having only approached this from the equipment manufacturing side I would not want to be the one to suggest numbers. What you get will depend on a lot of factors, particular the surface condition of the weld, and of course the size of defect you are looking for.
: I would stongly suggested getting equipment vendors involvd and commissioning some serious trials.
: One point worth making is that If you are looking at Electromagnetic Inspection of welds, and if the speed is critical to the point that the relatively higher purchase cost of the ACFM equipment is less important, you should probably be comparing both standard eddy current, and ACFM methods.
: Joe
: : : Please, can anybody tell me which is the average production rate for eddy current manual inspection of ferromagnetic steel welds, covered by a 0,5mm thick non-conductive coating?
: : : Which length can be inspected during a normal 8 hours shift, with proper access and working conditions?
: :
: : Everybody HELP!
: : We need to inspect by EC a great length of butt-weld and we really need to evaluate the time periode requested for this operation,
: : There is someone with experience in the field?
: : Thank you,
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

NOVO Armor 15 & NOVO Armor 22

The Armor Kit Contains the NOVO Armor, which provides additional mechanical protection to the NOVO 1
...
5WN & NOVO 22WN Detectors, the Armor Stand and a traveling soft cover. - Newest shock absorbent technology case - Water resistant design - Supports wired & wireless communication - Multiple positioning options - Tripod connection using the Built-in 1/4” threads - Simple Detector battery replacement
>

MIZ®-21C: Truly Affordable Eddy Current Handheld with Surface Array Capability

Introducing MIZ-21C, the first truly affordable handheld eddy current instrument with surface array
...
capabilities. MIZ-21C can deliver fast, accurate inspections in demanding NDT applications including aerospace, oil and gas, manufacturing, and power generation. The surface array solution can reduce inspection time by up to 95% compared to traditional handheld pencil probes. The ergonomic design, long battery life, and intuitive touchscreen mean you can inspect more areas faster than ever without fatigue.
>

NovaScope 6000

The all-digital Novascope 6000 is a portable, ultra-high precision thickness gauge for high-speed
...
thickness measurement. Novascope 6000 has unmatched capabilities and unique features including: •Superior Resolution with high contrast, high-speed color RF display •High pulser voltage •Real-time video output •Increased internal/external data storage •Programmable SetUp features •Battery & AC Powered
>

ISAFE3 Intrinsically Safe Sensor System

ISAFE3 intrinsically safe sensor system of Vallen Systeme is especially targeted at the petrochemica
...
l - as well as oil and gas transportation industry. The sensor system is designed for permanent monitoring or periodic inspection tasks. Sensors are available for different AE-frequency ranges optimized for corrosion and fatigue crack detection and other applications. The ISAFE 3 sensor system consists of an AE-sensor (model ISAS3) certified according to ATEX/IEC for installation in zone 0, gas group IIC, IP68, 20 to +60 °C, and a signal isolator (model SISO3) certified for installation in zone 2. An ISAS3 sensor can be mounted in atmosphere or submerged, e.g. in water or crude oil. It is supported by mounting tools for temporary (magnets) or permanent (welded) installation. ISAFE3 supports automatic sensor coupling test and can be used with any AE signal processor supporting 28V supply at 90 mA peak, e.g. Vallen Systeme ASIP-2/A.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window