where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

YXLON International GmbH
YXLON International - innovative High-Tech-Company with long traditionYXLON International develops, manufactures and markets digital radios ...
1623 views
Technical Discussions
Erik Mischker
Erik Mischker
00:32 Feb-12-2008
UT waveform preference

Was wondering what is the common preference for people out there to view there UT waveforms in an A-Scan; full waveform, positive rectification, negative rectification, or full rectification. On my Krautkramer field unit, it defaults to negative rec. and on lab the instruments its full waveform. Is it just a personal preference for what one is use to looking at, or is there a benefit to one or the other? Thanks


 
 Reply 
 
Tom Nelligan
Engineering,
retired, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 390

Tom Nelligan

Engineering,
retired,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
390
01:06 Feb-12-2008
Re: UT waveform preference
Some of it has to do with customary practice, and some with test requirements.

Full wave rectification is most people's choice for common flaw detection applications with portable instruments and narrowband transducers (like most angle beam assemblies), in part because for many years in the pre-digital age that was all that portable flaw detectors offered and it became customary, and in part because it's a simpler presentation. However RF provides a more detailed picture of the wave shape that is usually required for interpretation in TOFD testing or phase-sensitive bond testing, as well as in precision thickness gaging applications with broadband transducers where consistent echo lobe detection is required for maximum accuracy.

Oscilloscopes and PC-based waveform digitizers typically offer RF waveforms because historically a lot of users of that type of equipment were doing precision time measurements and/or more advanced wave analysis.

As with most ultrasonic tests, the rule is to choose the approach that meets your needs!




 
 Reply 
 
Joe Buckley
Consultant, ASNT L-III, Honorary Secretary of BINDT
Level X NDT, BINDT, United Kingdom, Joined Oct 1999, 524

Joe Buckley

Consultant, ASNT L-III, Honorary Secretary of BINDT
Level X NDT, BINDT,
United Kingdom,
Joined Oct 1999
524
01:34 Feb-12-2008
Re: UT waveform preference
I would agree with Tom's comments entirely, in addition some people prefer to use one or other of the half wave modes for precision thickness and similar applications

I suspect that this is mostly historic - I've never found an application where it gives better results than RF, but a lot of operators seem to feel more comfortable with the unipolar presentation.

Joe

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: Some of it has to do with customary practice, and some with test requirements.
: Full wave rectification is most people's choice for common flaw detection applications with portable instruments and narrowband transducers (like most angle beam assemblies), in part because for many years in the pre-digital age that was all that portable flaw detectors offered and it became customary, and in part because it's a simpler presentation. However RF provides a more detailed picture of the wave shape that is usually required for interpretation in TOFD testing or phase-sensitive bond testing, as well as in precision thickness gaging applications with broadband transducers where consistent echo lobe detection is required for maximum accuracy.
: Oscilloscopes and PC-based waveform digitizers typically offer RF waveforms because historically a lot of users of that type of equipment were doing precision time measurements and/or more advanced wave analysis.
: As with most ultrasonic tests, the rule is to choose the approach that meets your needs!
------------ End Original Message ------------




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

HD-CR 35 NDT Computed Radiography System

Portable high-resolution CR scanner for all radiography applications - weld testing, profile images
...
and aerospace. No matter what type of radiographic testing you are performing, the unique TreFoc Technology of the HD-CR 35 NDT imaging plate scanner always guarantees the highest image quality.
>

Ultrasonic Squirter/Gantry System

TecScan’s NDT Ultrasonic Gantry Systems are industrial Squirter scanners designed for non-destru
...
ctive quality testing and raster scanning of large structures and parts. The Gantry Systems are usually composed of an Industrial Mechanical Scanner and a Control Room with System Workstation.
>

Teletest Focus+

Teletest Focus+ electronics have superior capabilities than rivals on the market. Beyond the usual
...
test features, Focus+ has 24 transmit channels and 24 receive channels, with an additional on-board switching capabilities. The instrument's frequency range is 10–300 kHz.
>

Combination of Digital Image Correlation and Thermographic Measurements

The combination of measuring results from the digital image correlation (ARAMIS, DIC) and temperat
...
ure measuring data from infrared cameras permits the simultaneous analysis of the thermal and mechanical behavior of test specimens in the materials and components testing field.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window