where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

1311 views
Technical Discussions
Brian Younce
Brian Younce
05:07 Jul-13-2000
ASTM E1444 Requirement

NDT Folks,
In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

Thank you,
Brian


    
 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1247

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1247
07:36 Jul-13-2000
Re: ASTM E1444 Requirement
Brian:
ASTM 1444 Para. 5.5 is fairly specific about this.
It requires that WHEN specified, MPI is done after operations that could cause surface or near surface defects.
Then it goes on to state that MPI is to be done prior to coating unless otherwise approved by the contracting agency or as approved by para. 6.1.3. (6.1.3 describes conditions that would limit MPI through coatings).
Not withstanding 6.1.3, 5.5 goes on to state that MPI will ALSO be done on parts heat treated to 180ksi or higher and subsequently electroplated, AFTER electroplating.
This would therefore imply MPI is needed before and after electroplating unless the contracting agency does not require the MPI prior to electroplating (the requirement for MPI after electroplating is a SHALL condition so MUST be done).

Ed

: NDT Folks,
: In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
: My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

: Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

: Thank you,
: Brian




    
 
 
Brian M. Younce
Brian M. Younce
02:20 Jul-13-2000
Re: ASTM E1444 Requirement
>Thank you for your response. Is it safe to say the reason for the inspection after electroplating is based on a concern of hydrogen embrittlement cracking? If so, what is the nature of hydrogen embrittlement cracking??? Is it always an obvious condition (gross indications) or is it more of a material related condition which often goes undetected but serves as a vehicle for a stress/fatigue related crack in years to come???
>
>Regards,
>Brian

: Brian:
: ASTM 1444 Para. 5.5 is fairly specific about this.
: It requires that WHEN specified, MPI is done after operations that could cause surface or near surface defects.
: Then it goes on to state that MPI is to be done prior to coating unless otherwise approved by the contracting agency or as approved by para. 6.1.3. (6.1.3 describes conditions that would limit MPI through coatings).
: Not withstanding 6.1.3, 5.5 goes on to state that MPI will ALSO be done on parts heat treated to 180ksi or higher and subsequently electroplated, AFTER electroplating.
: This would therefore imply MPI is needed before and after electroplating unless the contracting agency does not require the MPI prior to electroplating (the requirement for MPI after electroplating is a SHALL condition so MUST be done).

: Ed

: : NDT Folks,
: : In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
: : My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

: : Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

: : Thank you,
: : Brian




    
 
 

Product Spotlight

Robotic laser shearography enables 100% inspection of complex, flight-critical composite structures

An article in “Composites World Magazine” showcases Non Destructive Testing of aero-structures
...
with Laser Shearography. Over the years Dantec Dynamics has supplied many solutions for the aerospace industry. Referring to specific customer projects several of these cases are examined to outline the advantages of using Laser Shearography for automated defect detection.
>

Cygnus 6+ PRO Multi-Mode Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge

The Cygnus 6+ PRO thickness gauge is the most advance gauge within the Cygnus range with key featu
...
res including: comprehensive data logging; A-scan and B-scan display; manual gain control; Bluetooth connectivity; and much more. With its unique dual display and three measuring modes (Multiple-Echo, Echo-Echo and Single-Echo), this surface thickness gauge offers maximum versatility for inspections.
>

Ultrasonic Testing Immersion Tanks with Unmatched Scanning Features

TecScan’s non-destructive testing Ultrasonic Immersion Tanks & scanners are designed for high pe
...
rformance and demanding NDT testing applications. Our Scan3D™ line of High Precision Immersion Tanks are specifically designed for automated ultrasonic testing of complex composites parts used in aerospace and industrial applications.
>

AIS229 - Multipurpose Real Time System

Latest standard & automatic real time system developed by Balteau. The AIS229 has been designed to
...
do series inspection in a wide variety of industry. Composed of a shielded cabinet, 5 axis manipulator, x-ray generator and tubehead from 160kV to 225kV, a fl at panel & much more, the AIS229 is most certainly one of the most multipurpose RTR system available on the market.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window