where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
1547 views
Technical Discussions
Brian Younce
Brian Younce
05:07 Jul-13-2000
ASTM E1444 Requirement

NDT Folks,
In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

Thank you,
Brian


 
 Reply 
 
Ed Ginzel
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1282

Ed Ginzel

R & D, -
Materials Research Institute,
Canada,
Joined Nov 1998
1282
07:36 Jul-13-2000
Re: ASTM E1444 Requirement
Brian:
ASTM 1444 Para. 5.5 is fairly specific about this.
It requires that WHEN specified, MPI is done after operations that could cause surface or near surface defects.
Then it goes on to state that MPI is to be done prior to coating unless otherwise approved by the contracting agency or as approved by para. 6.1.3. (6.1.3 describes conditions that would limit MPI through coatings).
Not withstanding 6.1.3, 5.5 goes on to state that MPI will ALSO be done on parts heat treated to 180ksi or higher and subsequently electroplated, AFTER electroplating.
This would therefore imply MPI is needed before and after electroplating unless the contracting agency does not require the MPI prior to electroplating (the requirement for MPI after electroplating is a SHALL condition so MUST be done).

Ed

: NDT Folks,
: In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
: My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

: Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

: Thank you,
: Brian




 
 Reply 
 
Brian M. Younce
Brian M. Younce
02:20 Jul-13-2000
Re: ASTM E1444 Requirement
>Thank you for your response. Is it safe to say the reason for the inspection after electroplating is based on a concern of hydrogen embrittlement cracking? If so, what is the nature of hydrogen embrittlement cracking??? Is it always an obvious condition (gross indications) or is it more of a material related condition which often goes undetected but serves as a vehicle for a stress/fatigue related crack in years to come???
>
>Regards,
>Brian

: Brian:
: ASTM 1444 Para. 5.5 is fairly specific about this.
: It requires that WHEN specified, MPI is done after operations that could cause surface or near surface defects.
: Then it goes on to state that MPI is to be done prior to coating unless otherwise approved by the contracting agency or as approved by para. 6.1.3. (6.1.3 describes conditions that would limit MPI through coatings).
: Not withstanding 6.1.3, 5.5 goes on to state that MPI will ALSO be done on parts heat treated to 180ksi or higher and subsequently electroplated, AFTER electroplating.
: This would therefore imply MPI is needed before and after electroplating unless the contracting agency does not require the MPI prior to electroplating (the requirement for MPI after electroplating is a SHALL condition so MUST be done).

: Ed

: : NDT Folks,
: : In reviewing ASTM E1444 (1999), I became hung up on a requirement described in section 5.5 "Examination Sequence". It is recommended that "parts heat treated to an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher that are heat treated and subsequently electroplated shall be inspected after the electroplating operation".
: : My questions are: does this suggest that parts having an ultimate tensile strength of 180 ksi or higher should be inspected twice, once prior to electroplating and once after electroplating? Would one inspection after electroplating be sufficient (plating thickness of less than .001")? What are the types of discontinuities to be concerned with? If the plating process is tightly controled, do you still need the post plating inspection?

: : Just curious if anyone has had any personal experience in dealing with this requirement, and if so how it was handled.

: : Thank you,
: : Brian




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

PROlineTOP Plug & Play Ultrasonic inspection device

As Plug & Play solution it units all control and operation elements in a small housing and therefo
...
re replaces the typical control cabinet...
>

Combination of Digital Image Correlation and Thermographic Measurements

The combination of measuring results from the digital image correlation (ARAMIS, DIC) and temperat
...
ure measuring data from infrared cameras permits the simultaneous analysis of the thermal and mechanical behavior of test specimens in the materials and components testing field.
>

NEOS III

NEOS III is Logos Imagings lightest DR system. With a built-in battery and internal wireless commu
...
nication, the NEOS III is perfect for users that want to quickly assess an item.
>

Lyft™: Pulsed Eddy Current Reinvented

PEC Reinvented—CUI Programs Redefined Corrosion under insulation (CUI) is possibly the greatest u
...
nresolved asset integrity problem in the industry. Current methods for measuring wall thickness with liftoff, without removing insulation, all have severe limitations. Eddyfi introduces Lyft — a reinvented, high-performance pulsed eddy current (PEC) solution. The patent- pending system features a state-of-the-art portable instrument, real- time C-scan imaging, fast data acquisition with grid-mapping and dynamic scanning modes, and flexibility with long cables. It can also scan through thick metal and insulation, as well as aluminum, stainless steel, and galvanized steel weather jackets. Who else but Eddyfi to reinvent an eddy current technique and redefine CUI programs. Got Lyft?
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window