where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

GB Inspection Systems Ltd.
A leading UK manufacturer of Ultrasonic Probes, Accessories, Supplier of NDT Equipment and more.

920 views
Career Discussions
Fred Raco, Jr.
Consultant,
RNDT, Inc., USA, Joined Jul 2002, 24

Fred Raco, Jr.

Consultant,
RNDT, Inc.,
USA,
Joined Jul 2002
24
04:41 May-20-2005
Welder Qualification

An interesting question was asked of us recently and we didn't have an answer. We were performing radiography on several WPQs and 2 out of 10 were rejected. The code (AWS D15.1) states that either radiography or two side bends may be performed for this qualification. Our customer asked us if we would perform the two side bends on the WPQs that failed radiography. Is this an acceptable practice to disregard the radiography failure? All comments are welcome. By the way, we did not perform the bend tests and the client took his business elsewhere.


    
 
 Reply 
 
Buddy
Buddy
06:22 May-20-2005
Re: Welder Qualification
It's my experience that if a component is known to fail one qualification method, another, possibly less severe examination method cannot be used to then qualify that component. In other words, once you know it fails, it fails. However, you might want to run this one by the experts at Inspection Trends magazine ( a publication from AWS), as I have limited knowledge of the AWS code.

----------- Start Original Message -----------
: An interesting question was asked of us recently and we didn't have an answer. We were performing radiography on several WPQs and 2 out of 10 were rejected. The code (AWS D15.1) states that either radiography or two side bends may be performed for this qualification. Our customer asked us if we would perform the two side bends on the WPQs that failed radiography. Is this an acceptable practice to disregard the radiography failure? All comments are welcome. By the way, we did not perform the bend tests and the client took his business elsewhere.
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 Reply 
 
Ed T.
Ed T.
02:42 May-22-2005
Re: Welder Qualification
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: An interesting question was asked of us recently and we didn't have an answer. We were performing radiography on several WPQs and 2 out of 10 were rejected. The code (AWS D15.1) states that either radiography or two side bends may be performed for this qualification. Our customer asked us if we would perform the two side bends on the WPQs that failed radiography. Is this an acceptable practice to disregard the radiography failure? All comments are welcome. By the way, we did not perform the bend tests and the client took his business elsewhere.
------------ End Original Message ------------

Absolutely Not!!! That is not in line with the intent of giving you the option of the 2.


    
 
 Reply 
 
mankenberg
Consultant
USA, Joined Nov 2003, 9

mankenberg

Consultant
USA,
Joined Nov 2003
9
02:58 Jun-17-2005
Re: Welder Qualification
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: An interesting question was asked of us recently and we didn't have an answer. We were performing radiography on several WPQs and 2 out of 10 were rejected. The code (AWS D15.1) states that either radiography or two side bends may be performed for this qualification. Our customer asked us if we would perform the two side bends on the WPQs that failed radiography. Is this an acceptable practice to disregard the radiography failure? All comments are welcome. By the way, we did not perform the bend tests and the client took his business elsewhere.
------------ End Original Message ------------

Sorry for the late reply to this question - I've been offline for a while.
Ed is right on the money on this. What your client is suggesting is clearly an unethical practice. The intent of the AWS codes in allowing different methods of evaluation of welder performance qualification test welds is to make life easier for the many different fabricators that use those codes.
For instance, a large fabricator with in-house radiography capabilities may choose to RT all of their welder tests. A smaller company may choose to use bend testing. A fabricator may consciously choose to use bend testing as a way to further evaluate the welder's skills (i.e. can the welder cut and gring the bend specimens to the proper dimensions?).
It would be an extremely unethical practice to RT a welder's test, find the "clean" areas, and then take bend specimens from these areas. Shame on them. I also have to wonder then about the work practices of this fabricator. Are these the type of welders that they want to do their work? A welder's test is performed in conditions that are far better than the welder can many times expect to find in production work. If the welder cannot even make a good test weld, how can they expect that that same welder will produce welds of acceptable quality in production?
Mankenberg


    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

Panther

M2M PANTHER is a phased-array equipment designed for both desktop and industrial applications, offer
...
ing unparalleled performance in a compact unit. It combines the speed required for industrial integrated Phased-Array Ultrasound (PAUT) solutions, with the most complete set of total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques, making it the ultimate tool for R&D and procedure qualification.
>

Combination of Digital Image Correlation and Thermographic Measurements

The combination of measuring results from the digital image correlation (ARAMIS, DIC) and temperat
...
ure measuring data from infrared cameras permits the simultaneous analysis of the thermal and mechanical behavior of test specimens in the materials and components testing field.
>

CIVA 2017 UT Module

CIVA NDE Simulation Software is the world leader of NDT Simulation. The UT simulation Module incl
...
udes: - "Beam computation": Beam propagation simulation - "Inspection Simulation": Beam interaction with flaws or specimens The user can simulate a whole inspection process (pulse echo, tandem or TOFD) with a wide range of probes (conventional, Phased- arrays or EMAT), components, and flaws.
>

NEW! The PragmaPro Instrument Platform

The PragmaPro is based on a modular cartridge technology and supports various NDT instrument modal
...
ities such as UT, PAUT, ECT and many more. This new platform is based on a machined, powder-coated aluminum frame for shock-proofness, best sealing qualities and maximum heat dissipation. This is practical to extend the outdoor temperature range and/or to extend the power injected in the transducers. The PragmaPro is aiming at a very wide range of applications, such as weld scanning, corrosion mapping and composite testing.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window