|Ed Ginzel |
R & D, -
Materials Research Institute, Canada, Joined Nov 1998, 1228
Universal DGS curves
I am looking for the source of the Universal DGS curves.
I have seen the General curves in many locations including the EN 583-2 (which replaces the DIN 54127-1) and several training manuals including the DGZfP UT2e.
But nowhere do I see the algorithms used to define the curves. The inverse square law for far zone decays of the disk reflectors is clear enough, but some of the peak amplitudes for the Disk reflectors (G >0.2) do not coincide with N but get shifted towards 2N.
The "estimates" for the near zone are another mystery.
|Hermann Wüstenberg |
R & D
BAM Berlin, Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 26
Re: Universal DGS curves ----------- Start Original Message -----------
: I am looking for the source of the Universal DGS curves.
: I have seen the General curves in many locations including the EN 583-2 (which replaces the DIN 54127-1) and several training manuals including the DGZfP UT2e.
: But nowhere do I see the algorithms used to define the curves. The inverse square law for far zone decays of the disk reflectors is clear enough, but some of the peak amplitudes for the Disk reflectors (G >0.2) do not coincide with N but get shifted towards 2N.
: The "estimates" for the near zone are another mystery.
------------ End Original Message ------------
The universal DGS diagram had been introduced in Germany between 1968 and 1973, in order to be used for ultrasonic weld inspection with angle beam probes as a tool for the sensitivity setting and the definition of recording and acceptance thresholds. The structure of this diagram in the nearfield zone is based on a compromise derived frommeasurements and calculations for normal incident and angle beam probes of various transducer shape, size and frequency. According to the publications of this time one has considered the curves in the nearfield range for distances smaller than 1.5x No (No = Nearfield length) as sufficiently precise (e.g. not more than 1,5 dB deviation below this distance). A first report on the basic work for the definition of this universal DGS diagram has been presented May 1969 during the annual conference of the german NDT society DGZfP at Freudenstadt.
(H. Wüstenberg, E. Mundry: Beitrag zum AVG-Diagramm für Winkelprüfköpfe) This report is still available at the BAM Berlin. It seems that an English translation had been foreseen for a Working group of the IIW with the document Nr. IIW Document WG-Vc 2/71 (1971).
Since the nearfield length is a key value for the application of an universal DGS-diagram, this report gives an early approximation for the nearfield length of angle beam probes with rectangular transducers, which later on has been modified based on publications from U. Schlengermann, J. Marini , H. Wüstenberg as e.g. cited in
„Zur Auswahl der Membranformen bei Winkelprüfköpfen für die Ultraschallprüfung,“
Wüstenberg, H., Schulz, E., Möhrle, W., Kutzner, J.:
Materialprüfung 18 Nr. 7, Juli 1976, p. 223-230
and is now applied as follows:
No = 1/(pi*lambda) *(a*a +b*b) * ( 0,78 - 0,27*(a/b)) with a < b
For the total soundpath Stot= Sobj +Sequ one has to take into account the delay path within the wedge as a so-called soundfield equivalent path
( Sequ = Swedge*Cwedge/Cobj)
With the effective diameter of an equivalent circular transducer derived from the above mentioned nearfield length ( Deff = 2*SQRT(l*No) ) one is able to use the universal DGS-diagram for sensitivity setting and echo amplitude evaluation purposes.
There had been several commercial approaches to describe the universal DGS-diagram and its curves by simple mathematical formula. Information about those efforts may be asked from the producers of UT equipments. (e.g. GE/Krautkrämer or Olympus/Panametrics)
Conformable wedge transducer
The conformability is obtained with a flexible membrane filled with water between the transducer and
the inspected component. The coupling between the membrane and the component requires a small quantity of water or couplant. The conformable wedge combines the acoustic performance of immersion technique with good coupling and low attenuation.
GEKKO - Portable Phased Array Testing with TFM in Real-Time
The portable phased array testing system GEKKO provides 64 parallel test channels. On creating testi
ng parameters the operator is assisted by the CIVA software. Due to its modular set-up the GEKKO instrument is suitable for operators of all skill levels.
Lyft™: Pulsed Eddy Current Reinvented
PEC Reinvented—CUI Programs Redefined
Corrosion under insulation (CUI) is possibly the greatest u
asset integrity problem in the industry. Current methods for
measuring wall thickness with liftoff, without removing insulation,
all have severe limitations. Eddyfi introduces Lyft — a reinvented,
high-performance pulsed eddy current (PEC) solution. The patent-
pending system features a state-of-the-art portable instrument, real-
time C-scan imaging, fast data acquisition with grid-mapping and
dynamic scanning modes, and flexibility with long cables. It can also
scan through thick metal and insulation, as well as aluminum,
stainless steel, and galvanized steel weather jackets. Who else but
Eddyfi to reinvent an eddy current technique and redefine CUI
programs. Got Lyft?
The all-digital Novascope 6000 is a portable, ultra-high precision
thickness gauge for high-speed
Novascope 6000 has unmatched capabilities and unique features
•Superior Resolution with high contrast, high-speed color RF
•High pulser voltage
•Real-time video output
•Increased internal/external data storage
•Programmable SetUp features
•Battery & AC Powered