where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

3175 views
Career Discussions
NELSON
Engineering, QAQC MECHANICAL ENGINEER
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD, Philippines, Joined Feb 2008, 3

NELSON

Engineering, QAQC MECHANICAL ENGINEER
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD,
Philippines,
Joined Feb 2008
3
04:31 May-23-2008
aws and api standard for ut acceptance criterion

could you please tell me the difference of AWS and API STANDARD for ultrasonic testing acceptance criteria for flaws on weld?i.e.,porosity,slags,etc.


    
 
 
Luis Santoyo
Luis Santoyo
01:59 May-23-2008
Re: aws and api standard for ut acceptance criterion
The main difference is that AWS apply to structural welds and API like API 1104 to welds in pipes of Oil Industry, also, with API you probably need to use DAC to evaluate discontinuities, with AWS D1.1, you make some calculations regarding to the amplitude of the discontinuity against a known amplitude (Some new equipments already have it) and you are able to say if the indication is accepted or rejected. With AWS you may only use wedges of 45 -60 and 70 degrees.
Hope this can help you
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: could you please tell me the difference of AWS and API STANDARD for ultrasonic testing acceptance criteria for flaws on weld?i.e.,porosity,slags,etc.
------------ End Original Message ------------




    
 
 
Gowri Santhosh
NDT Inspector,
Royscan engineering pte ltd, Singapore, Joined May 2008, 52

Gowri Santhosh

NDT Inspector,
Royscan engineering pte ltd,
Singapore,
Joined May 2008
52
04:46 May-24-2008
Re: aws and api standard for ut acceptance criterion
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: The main difference is that AWS apply to structural welds and API like API 1104 to welds in pipes of Oil Industry, also, with API you probably need to use DAC to evaluate discontinuities, with AWS D1.1, you make some calculations regarding to the amplitude of the discontinuity against a known amplitude (Some new equipments already have it) and you are able to say if the indication is accepted or rejected. With AWS you may only use wedges of 45 -60 and 70 degrees.
: Hope this can help you
: : could you please tell me the difference of AWS and API STANDARD for ultrasonic testing acceptance criteria for flaws on weld?i.e.,porosity,slags,etc.
------------ End Original Message ------------

Hi,
This is Gowri from india. Go to matter.
First of all API acceptance criteria is very simple and not confident. If any echo amplitude exceeding 100% of DAC, you have to give x-ray prove up for Additonal verification. Here the radiography is the final testing to the discontinuity Evaluation. You cant reject or repair the weld with UT.
In AWS, acceptance criteria is effective and critical(in early days). Here we have to consider lot of things such as reference dB, flaw indication dB, attenuation factor and indication rating. A table (6.2 & 6.3) is provided in AWS D1.1 for acceptance criteria. You can get lot of information there. Now all UFD are having AWS mode for easy evaluation.


    
 
 
Gowri santhosh
NDT Inspector,
Royscan engineering pte ltd, Singapore, Joined May 2008, 52

Gowri santhosh

NDT Inspector,
Royscan engineering pte ltd,
Singapore,
Joined May 2008
52
06:51 May-24-2008
Re: aws and api standard for ut acceptance criterion
Hi,
The two main differences are there. In API, reference standards or blocks are used for calibration as well as in AWS standard blocks (IIW V1) are used. And there is no necessity to make DAC in AWS A.C,. DAC is used for evaluation in API a.c,. (a.c- acceptance criteria)


    
 
 
SHAI
Consultant, octg inspector
services, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Joined May 2007, 1

SHAI

Consultant, octg inspector
services,
United Arab Emirates (UAE),
Joined May 2007
1
00:41 May-24-2008
Re: aws and api standard for ut acceptance criterion
----------- Start Original Message -----------
: could you please tell me the difference of AWS and API STANDARD for ultrasonic testing acceptance criteria for flaws on weld?i.e.,porosity,slags,etc.
------------ End Original Message ------------

Dear nelson

AWS is for stractural component. like building offshore, and API is for drilling tools and pipeline.

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:06 PM, wrote:





    
 
 

Product Spotlight

HD-CR 35 NDT Computed Radiography System

Portable high-resolution CR scanner for all radiography applications - weld testing, profile images
...
and aerospace. No matter what type of radiographic testing you are performing, the unique TreFoc Technology of the HD-CR 35 NDT imaging plate scanner always guarantees the highest image quality.
>

FMC/TFM

Next generation for Phased Array UT is here now with FMC/TFM! Have higher resolution imaging, impr
...
oved signal to noise ratio, characterize, size and analyze defects better with access to several wave mode views and save raw FMC data for higher quality analysis.  Some of the benefits are:
  • Beautiful Image! Easier to understand what you're looking at
  • Completely focused in entire image or volume
  • Much easier to define setups before inspection
  • Easier to decipher geometry echoes from real defects
  • Oriented defects (e.g. cracks) are imaged better
  • See image from different wave modes from one FMC inspection
  • FMC data can be reprocessed/analyzed without going back to the field
>

Sci Aps Z-Series Portable Handheld Analysers

The world’s only handheld analyzer that measures carbon content in stainless (yes even L-grades),s
...
teels, and cast irons. Also accepted for low Si analysis for sulfidic corrosion analysis, and is widely used in the power industry for Cr analysis, for flow accelerated corrosion applications.
>

Panther

M2M PANTHER is a phased-array equipment designed for both desktop and industrial applications, offer
...
ing unparalleled performance in a compact unit. It combines the speed required for industrial integrated Phased-Array Ultrasound (PAUT) solutions, with the most complete set of total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques, making it the ultimate tool for R&D and procedure qualification.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window