where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -

504 views
Technical Discussions
Rolf Diederichs
Director,
NDT.net, Germany, Joined Nov 1998, 618

Rolf Diederichs

Director,
NDT.net,
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
618
03:38 Jun-08-1998
Problems With Crack Detection In High-Speed ICE Wheels

Problems With Crack Detection In High-Speed ICE Wheels

The Deutsche Bahn AG (DB) knew about the problems with the crack detection technique used on the railroad wheels of the high-speed ICE."The DB knew that wheels must be tested" said Prof. Hermann Wüstenberg, chairman of the ultrasonic testing committee of the German Society for Nondestructive Testing (DGZfP) to NDTnet.

When ICE was first developed, the DB followed a testing procedure which gave clear results for wheels with low running time. However, in May 1996, recognizing the weaknesses of this system, the DB began to develop a new procedure.

Before, wheels with short running time had been be tested with the "ultrasonic surface wave method" only. With this method it is possible to test the complete circumference of the wheel in "one shot." However, this surface wave method delivers uncertain results when small surface disturbances are present, e.g., water drops, oil film. Results are especially affected after long running times; in other words, the method is weakest just where it needs to be strongest. With increasing running time the results of crack detection are more and more imprecise.

The new test systems which had been discussed in May 1996 involved a much better ultrasonic method in addition to an eddy current method. It is unclear why until today this only been partially implemented in new trials; specifically the eddy current method had not been put into practice.

Because the DB had knowledge of the problems that existed with the testing methods they used, they must answer the question: Why was safety not accorded a higher priority? (NDTnet)

Rolf Diederichs


 
 Reply 
 
Kopliger Martin
Kopliger Martin
09:24 Sep-06-1998
Re: Problems With Crack Detection In High-Speed ICE Wheels
: Problems With Crack Detection In High-Speed ICE Wheels

: The Deutsche Bahn AG (DB) knew about the problems with the crack detection technique used on the railroad wheels of the high-speed ICE. "The DB knew that
: wheels must be tested" said Prof. Hermann Wüstenberg, chairman of the ultrasonic testing committee of the German Society for Nondestructive Testing (DGZfP) to NDTnet.

: When ICE was first developed, the DB followed a testing procedure which gave clear results for wheels with low running time. However, in May 1998, recognizing
: the weaknesses of this system, the DB began to develop a new procedure.

: Before, wheels with short running time had been be tested with the "ultrasonic surface wave method" only. With this method it is possible to test the complete
: circumference of the wheel in "one shot." However, this surface wave method delivers uncertain results when small surface disturbances are present, e.g., water
: drops, oil film. Results are especially affected after long running times; in other words, the method is weakest just where it needs to be strongest. With increasing
: running time the results of crack detection are more and more imprecise.

: The new test systems which had been discussed in May 1996 involved a much better ultrasonic method in addition to an eddy current method. It is unclear why until
: today this only been partially implemented in new trials; specifically the eddy current method had not been put into practice.

: Because the DB had knowledge of the problems that existed with the testing methods they used, they must answer the question: Why was safety not accorded a
: higher priority? (NDTnet)

: Rolf Diederichs




 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

ISONIC 3510

Very Powerful Superior Performance Extremely Portable Smart Phased Array Ultrasonic Flaw Detector an
...
d Recorder with 2 Conventional UT and TOFD Channels uniquely combines PA, single- and multi-channel conventional UT, and TOFD modalities providing 100% raw data recording and imaging. Suitable for all kinds of every-day ultrasonic inspections
>

FD800 Bench Top Flaw Detectors

The bench-top FD800 flaw detector range combines state-of-the-art flaw detection with advanced mater
...
ial thickness capabilities. Designed for use in the laboratory these gauges are the tool you need for all your flaw detecting needs.
>

FMC/TFM

Next generation for Phased Array UT is here now with FMC/TFM! Have higher resolution imaging, impr
...
oved signal to noise ratio, characterize, size and analyze defects better with access to several wave mode views and save raw FMC data for higher quality analysis.  Some of the benefits are:
  • Beautiful Image! Easier to understand what you're looking at
  • Completely focused in entire image or volume
  • Much easier to define setups before inspection
  • Easier to decipher geometry echoes from real defects
  • Oriented defects (e.g. cracks) are imaged better
  • See image from different wave modes from one FMC inspection
  • FMC data can be reprocessed/analyzed without going back to the field
>

HARDNESS TESTER TKM-459CE combi

TKM-459CE combi applies 2 methods of hardness control: UCI and Leeb. It provides high-accuracy tes
...
ting of metals and alloys as well as items of different sizes and configurations, their hardened layers and galvanic coatings. Device represents results in HB, HRC, HV and others. Shock-, dust- and water-proof housing with intuitive software make this gauge easy to use in all working conditions.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window