where expertise comes together - since 1996

Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)
Open Access Database (Conference Proceedings, Articles, News), Exhibition, Forum, Network

All Forum Boards
Technical Discussions >
pits in feromagnetic steel
Career Discussions
Job Offers
Job Seeks
Classified Ads
About NDT.net
Articles & News

DASEL SISTEMAS
Our Phased Array equipments, based on SITAU Technology, are among the PAS highest performance in the market.

1414 views
04:35 Nov-16-2000

Elmar van den Elzen

Engineering,
Lismar Engineering B.V.,
Netherlands,
Joined Aug 2000
15
pits in feromagnetic steel

Dear NDT colleagues,

We are looking for a suitable method to measure small pits (typically 1.5mm x 0.5mm x 0.3mm deep) and cracks in a hardened cast steel roll. Normal eddy current testing does not seem to be useful due to very large permeability noise. We tried special weld probes of Zetec without success either. Also a quick try with a 4MHz surface wave probe did not convincingly show the pits either. The rolls are rather large (about 0.5m diameter) and need to be inspected automatically. Does anybody know of a suitable method that’s commercially available? Some approaches we thought about are to use eddy current and magnetically saturate the steel under the probe. Or perhaps Magnetic Flux Leakage would be a possibility?

Regards,
Elmar van den Elzen


 
05:56 Nov-16-2000
Dave Ronson
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel : Dear NDT colleagues,

: We are looking for a suitable method to measure small pits (typically 1.5mm x 0.5mm x 0.3mm deep) and cracks in a hardened cast steel roll. Normal eddy current testing does not seem to be useful due to very large permeability noise. We tried special weld probes of Zetec without success either. Also a quick try with a 4MHz surface wave probe did not convincingly show the pits either. The rolls are rather large (about 0.5m diameter) and need to be inspected automatically. Does anybody know of a suitable method that’s commercially available? Some approaches we thought about are to use eddy current and magnetically saturate the steel under the probe. Or perhaps Magnetic Flux Leakage would be a possibility?

: Regards,
: Elmar van den Elzen

Are the pits open to the surface? If so a new instrument has been released by RENE, of Van Nuys California, (tele:818-785-1010). It is the 8400K Digitl Optical Micrometer. It lets you measure the width of scratches using the reticle eyepiece and vertical depth of surface features, usually to evaluate the severity of mechanical damage such as scratches, corrosion, pits,or blemishes difficult to observe by other methods. It is rugged and portable and shock resistant. It can be used on convex, concave or any combination of these surfaces.



 
03:13 Nov-17-2000
Richard Kazares
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel Well - unfortunately there is no "free lunch" in physics. To measure small "things" on a "large" surface almost always requires lots of resolution and time.

In the past, we have appliced Ultrasonic (UT) techniques to find, measure and plot the distribution of extremely fine pits - much less than 1 mm across or deep, on surfaces with many pits. (The problem was to determince the impact damage potential from micro-meteroids in space). This was accomplished with a high-frequency, highly focused UT probe using very fine mechanical scanning resolution.

While this technique would probably be usable in your case - the time needed to accomplish the task might be too long - again depending on the quantity of your samples and the time available to perform the scan.

That (of course) is your decision.


 
03:13 Nov-17-2000
Richard Kazares
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel Well - unfortunately there is no "free lunch" in physics. To measure small "things" on a "large" surface almost always requires lots of resolution and time.

In the past, we have applied Ultrasonic (UT) techniques to find, measure and plot the distribution of extremely fine pits - much less than 1 mm across or deep, on surfaces with many pits. (The problem was to determince the impact damage potential from micro-meteroids in space). This was accomplished with a high-frequency, highly focused UT probe using very fine mechanical scanning resolution.

While this technique would probably be usable in your case - the time needed to accomplish the task might be too long - again depending on the quantity of your samples and the time available to perform the scan.

That (of course) is your decision.


 
05:16 Nov-17-2000

Richard D. Roberts

Engineering, Executive Managment
Quest Integrity Group,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
78
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel Dear Sir,

Have you considered the use of laser profiling (Laser Profilometry) for your application? If all you are interested in is detection and quantification of very small pits, laser may be the way to go. Laser is not effected by “any” properties in the material such as permeability, external attachments, surface roughness, thickness, etc.

A “off the shelf” system built by QUEST integrated can reliably detect pits with diameters as small as 0.25mm (0.010”) and depths as shallow as 0.127mm (0.050”). QUEST also builds several other systems that have even a higher degree of accuracy. You can locate the QUEST web-site at http://www.qi2.com

Regards,
Rich Roberts

------------------- Origional Message ---------------
: Dear NDT colleagues,

: We are looking for a suitable method to measure small pits (typically 1.5mm x 0.5mm x 0.3mm deep) and cracks in a hardened cast steel roll. Normal eddy current testing does not seem to be useful due to very large permeability noise. We tried special weld probes of Zetec without success either. Also a quick try with a 4MHz surface wave probe did not convincingly show the pits either. The rolls are rather large (about 0.5m diameter) and need to be inspected automatically. Does anybody know of a suitable method that’s commercially available? Some approaches we thought about are to use eddy current and magnetically saturate the steel under the probe. Or perhaps Magnetic Flux Leakage would be a possibility?

: Regards,
: Elmar van den Elzen




 
09:09 Nov-20-2000

Ingo Becker

Engineering, NDT Inspector & Sales
ec-works GmbH,
Germany,
Joined Apr 2000
28
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel Hello Elmar,

we think that our eddy current system will be able to detect the pits in your ferromagnetic material.
We have many experience in all kind of eddy current technology and the testing of ferromagnetic materials (even automatic systems in the industries). We develope and produce our own probes as well as our own mechanical and software applications.
Please take a look to our webpages or our NDT forum excibition. The fastest way to get closer to your problem will be a direct talk with our eddy current specialist during his next travell to the Netherlands within the next weeks.

Please contact us via e-mail or telephon: +49 5084-93010

Regards

Ingo Becker

: Dear NDT colleagues,

: We are looking for a suitable method to measure small pits (typically 1.5mm x 0.5mm x 0.3mm deep) and cracks in a hardened cast steel roll. Normal eddy current testing does not seem to be useful due to very large permeability noise. We tried special weld probes of Zetec without success either. Also a quick try with a 4MHz surface wave probe did not convincingly show the pits either. The rolls are rather large (about 0.5m diameter) and need to be inspected automatically. Does anybody know of a suitable method that’s commercially available? Some approaches we thought about are to use eddy current and magnetically saturate the steel under the probe. Or perhaps Magnetic Flux Leakage would be a possibility?

: Regards,
: Elmar van den Elzen




 
07:23 Nov-20-2000

John O'Brien

Consultant, -
Chevron ETC ,
USA,
Joined Jan 2000
278
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel The pits are very small even for an MFL System. You might look at the SLOFEC technique.
Try contacting Kontroll Teknik in Germany or RTD in Holland.




 
01:43 Nov-27-2000
Zhong Soo Lim
Re: pits in feromagnetic steel I am working for steel works in Korea.
They have the same problems (permeability variation, mis-call, non-detection) you have mentioned for roll surface inspection using eddy current and ultrasonics.
Magnetic flux leakage method can be applied with good detectibility for the defect size you mentioned.
The inspection time can be easily reduced using multichannel configuration without too much increasing the system cost.
The conventional dc magnetic flux leakage method can be extended to ac method.
I have presented a paper in WCNDT 2000 in Rome.
You can find the paper at
http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn217/idn217.htm

If you have further question contact me.

Regards,
Zhong Soo Lim

: Dear NDT colleagues,

: We are looking for a suitable method to measure small pits (typically 1.5mm x 0.5mm x 0.3mm deep) and cracks in a hardened cast steel roll. Normal eddy current testing does not seem to be useful due to very large permeability noise. We tried special weld probes ofZetec without success either. Also a quick try with a 4MHz surface wave probe did not convincingly show the pits either. The rolls are rather large (about 0.5m diameter) and need to be inspected automatically. Does anybody know of a suitable method that’s commercially available? Some approaches we thought about are to use eddy current and magnetically saturate the steel under the probe. Or perhaps Magnetic Flux Leakage would be a possibility?

: Regards,
: Elmar van den Elzen




 


© NDT.net - The Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) ISSN 1435-4934

Open Access Database, |Conference Proceedings| |Articles| |News| |Exhibition| |Forum| |Professional Network|