where expertise comes together - since 1996

Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)
Open Access Database (Conference Proceedings, Articles, News), Exhibition, Forum, Network

All Forum Boards
Technical Discussions >
POD of Manual vs. Automatic Testing on Railroad Wheels
Career Discussions
Job Offers
Job Seeks
Classified Ads
About NDT.net
Articles & News

Teletest
Teletest Focus+ was the first system to use long-range guided wave ultrasonic testing to detect corrosion in pipelines.

374 views
08:54 Jun-15-1998

Rolf Diederichs

Director, Editor, Publisher, Internet, PHP MySQL
NDT.net,
Germany,
Joined Nov 1998
602
POD of Manual vs. Automatic Testing on Railroad Wheels

After ultrasonic testing was applied manually on all wheels of the ICE of the German Bahn a part of totally 60 trains could start again operation. Yesterday all those trains have been called back!

(Background: Yesterday's broken wheels of the same ICE wheel type used at Hamburg's subway may be leaded to this action)

This shows an uncertainty if those previously manually applied ultrasonic tests are sufficient enough.
NDT experts know about this matter, probability of detection (POD), and how to calculate it, how to find the appropriate method.

Automated NDT Advantages and Disadvantages,
by Godfrey Hands, Vianen, The Netherlands 1.March.1996

This article describes briefly that the probability of detection of manually ultrasonic testing can
be 'only' 80% while automated testing reaches 100%.

Who can say more about it.

And sorry for keeping up the unpleasant broken wheel matter.
What shall be done with those trains - can they drive with 80% POD?

Rolf Diederichs



 


© NDT.net - The Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) ISSN 1435-4934

Open Access Database, |Conference Proceedings| |Articles| |News| |Exhibition| |Forum| |Professional Network|