where expertise comes together - since 1996

Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)
Open Access Database (Conference Proceedings, Articles, News), Exhibition, Forum, Network

All Forum Boards
Technical Discussions >
Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers
Career Discussions
Job Offers
Job Seeks
Classified Ads
About NDT.net
Articles & News

668 views
06:45 Sep-26-1996
A. Anev
Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers

What is the difference in the accuracy of dry-coupled, air coupled and EMAT transducers generally and regarding near surface and internal imperfections?
Suppose all the transducers work at the accuracy at which they give the best results.
Furthermore do you think polymer transducers can be used as dry-coupled ones?



    
 
06:41 Sep-27-1996
A. Anev
Correction Re: Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers : What is the difference in the accuracy of dry-coupled, air coupled and EMAT transducers generally and regarding near surface and internal imperfections?
: Suppose all the transducers work at the accuracy at which they give the best results.

I'm sorry. I wanted to say : Suppose all the transducers work at the FREQUENCY (not accuracy) at which they give the best results.

: Furthermore do you think polymer transducers can be used as dry-coupled ones?




    
 
07:56 Sep-27-1996

Yoseph Bar-Cohen

R & D,
Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL),
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
26
Re: Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers It is possible to produce a dry-coupled transducer that is driven by
polymer piezoelectric materials (PPM). However, this application will
not be an effective use of these piezoelectric materials because of
the spectral range that is required. The useful range of dry-coupled
transducers is below 1MHz, on the other hand PPM transducers are
producing a reasonably high signals only at the MHz range. In
general, PPM are efficient receivers due to their low noise but they
are relatively weak transmitters.

Yosi


: What is the difference in the accuracy of dry-coupled, air coupled and EMAT transducers generally and regarding near surface and internal imperfections?
: Suppose all the transducers work at the accuracy at which they give the best results.
: Furthermore do you think polymer transducers can be used as dry-coupled ones?





    
 
09:32 Sep-27-1996
Rathgeb/Meier
Re: Comparison of dry-coupled, air-coupled and EMAT transducers : What is the difference in the accuracy of dry-coupled, air coupled and EMAT transducers generally and regarding near surface and internal imperfections?
: Suppose all the transducers work at the accuracy at which they give the best results.
: Furthermore do you think polymer transducers can be used as dry-coupled ones?

The use of EMAT transducers is restricted to materials with a high
conductivity. The results measured on aluminum or ferritic steel test pieces
are very good, stainless steel test pieces may show worse results. This behaviour
also depends on design details of the EMAT-probe:
- EMAT SH (shear wave horizontal)probes with the electrical coil between the
rows of permanent magnets and the test piece surface work very well also on
stainless steel components, but due to design details, this probe type is
restricted to frequencies below 1 MHz.
- EMAT SH probes with the electrical coil wounded arround a ferritic yoke
allow frequencies up to 2 kHz, but they do not work on stainless steel.
- New develloped Siemens SH probes allow frequencies up to 2 MHz and work
also on stainless steel, but the sensitivity on ferritic steel components
is some dBs better.
- New develloped Siemens SV (shear wave, vertical polarised) probes with
frequencies up to 2 MHz work also on stainless steel components. The
sensitvity on ferritic steel or on aluminium is also some dBs better.
With these probes, used as phased array probes, it is possible to produce
a 0 degree shear wave, a 40 to 45 degree shear wave or a rayleighwave.

Generally, EMAT suffers on a lift off effect: The higher the frequency,
the bigger the lift off. This requires a flat surface for a good "coupling"
of the probe. In the case of the above mentioned SV probe, the lift off effect
(loss of sensitivity) can be corrected by evaluating the amplitude of a
0 degrees wave reflected at the backwall.

EMAT also suffers on a quite long dead zone, due to crosstalk of the transmitter
current to the receiver. Also the sound beam is not so well formed as in the
case of piezo transducers.

Advantages of EMAT are the testing without couplant and the possibility to
choose the orientation of the polarisation! The second means, that one can
avoid the conversion into other wave modes by use of EMAT and one can also
minimize the deflection of the ultrasonic beam in case of a distinct grain
orientation in stainless steel or dissimilar welds by choosing the right
polarisation of the ultrasound.

Dependent on the above mentioned factors (material, frequency, surface, probe
design etc.) it is possible to detect notches with a depth of about 1mm, as well
on the probe near surface (rayleigh wave, lamb wave) as on the probe far
surface (45 degree shear wave). Up to now, precise sizing with EMAT is still
a problem, but this is improoving!

Rainer Meier





    
 
09:03 Oct-01-1996
A.Anev
Thank you for the answers Thank you very much for the answers.
The idea about this workshop is excellent.
I really enjoyed visiting it.
Best regards,
A. Anev



    
 


© NDT.net - The Web's Largest Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT) ISSN 1435-4934

Open Access Database, |Conference Proceedings| |Articles| |News| |Exhibition| |Forum| |Professional Network|