where expertise comes together - since 1996 -

The Largest Open Access Portal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Conference Proceedings, Articles, News, Exhibition, Forum, Network and more

where expertise comes together
- since 1996 -
517 views
Technical Discussions
Stevie Jones
Stevie Jones
07:33 Oct-01-1996
Face plate thickness

Hello.
Sorry to come late, could I maybe sneak another
question in?
We all know that the best face plate for a transducer
is 1/4 wave thick and its impedance is the mean (either
arithmetic or geometric, depends on the paper) of the
transducer and target impedances.

My question is, what about when either you don't know
what the impedance of the target is, or you cannot
control the impedance of the face that well? Both
apply to soft-faced contact NDT probes. How thick
should the faceplate be then?




    
 
 Reply 
 
Robert A. Day
Engineering
Milky Way Jewels, USA, Joined Nov 1998, 40

Robert A. Day

Engineering
Milky Way Jewels,
USA,
Joined Nov 1998
40
02:36 Oct-04-1996
Re: Face plate thickness
Steve -

The 1/4 wavelength is only for continuous wave sound. Usually the thickness
is a little less for pulsed transducers and in some cases you are better
off with a long delay line. Ideal thickness is at best a compromise. One
way to improve on the compromise is to use two layers one of higher
impedance and one lower in which both are less than 1/4 wavelength. The
actual thickness is usually arrived at empirically in either case.

The case of an unknown impedance is usually handled by just picking
something that works well in general. The types of layers used for contact
transducers for steel usually are poor matches. Use of plastic for example
is popular but clearly doesn't meet the arithmetric or geometric mean
criteria at all. Another popular material is aluminum oxide which matches
the crystal better than either mean. Wear is the criteria being used to
justify aluminum oxide.

Not knowing the impedance is puzzling. Do you mean there is one and you
just don't know it? Or will it vary from part to part or within the part?
Even in these cases you should have some bounds?

In most cases you should be able to do well with any good quality contact
transducer. If much "scrubbing" is involved I would recommend the aluminum
oxide types because they wear much better. The only exception being
plastics where you may want to use a plastic faced probe because wear is
not a problem or the transducer face may wear the part.

Regards,
Rocky
Second Sound


: Hello.
: Sorry to come late, could I maybe sneak another
: question in?
: We all know that the best face plate for a transducer
: is 1/4 wave thick and its impedance is the mean (either
: arithmetic or geometric, depends on the paper) of the
: transducer and target impedances.

: My question is, what about when either you don't know
: what the impedance of the target is, or you cannot
: control the impedance of the face that well? Both
: apply to soft-faced contact NDT probes. How thick
: should the faceplate be then?




    
 
 Reply 
 
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
05:01 Oct-04-1996
Re: Face plate thickness
Rocky,
: Steve -

: Not knowing the impedance is puzzling. Do you mean there is one and you
: just don't know it? Or will it vary from part to part or within the part?
: Even in these cases you should have some bounds?
I was thinking of general purpose use, where the material could be steel,
or aluminium, or maybe plastic, or ... and you don't want to have hundreds of
pounds tied up in transducers.

: In most cases you should be able to do well with any good quality contact
: transducer. If much "scrubbing" is involved I would recommend the aluminum
OK, you can get by with just about anything. I was wondering if the
academic community had any suggestions for more than
just getting by. It seems not, which is understandable.

: Regards,
: Rocky
: Second Sound





    
 
 Reply 
 

Product Spotlight

GEKKO - Portable Phased Array Testing with TFM in Real-Time

The portable phased array testing system GEKKO provides 64 parallel test channels. On creating testi
...
ng parameters the operator is assisted by the CIVA software. Due to its modular set-up the GEKKO instrument is suitable for operators of all skill levels.
>

Teletest Focus+

Teletest Focus+ electronics have superior capabilities than rivals on the market. Beyond the usual
...
test features, Focus+ has 24 transmit channels and 24 receive channels, with an additional on-board switching capabilities. The instrument's frequency range is 10–300 kHz.
>

Compact NDT inspection-heads for measurements with active thermography

The compact inspection head is suitable for thermographic ndt tasks. The uncooled infrared camera
...
is specially developed for NDI-tasks and offers a thermal sensitivity until now known only from thermal imagers with cooled detector. All required components and functions are integrated into the inspection-head. You will only need an ethernet cable to connect the sensor with the evaluation system.
>

Robotic laser shearography enables 100% inspection of complex, flight-critical composite structures

An article in “Composites World Magazine” showcases Non Destructive Testing of aero-structures
...
with Laser Shearography. Over the years Dantec Dynamics has supplied many solutions for the aerospace industry. Referring to specific customer projects several of these cases are examined to outline the advantages of using Laser Shearography for automated defect detection.
>

Share...
We use technical and analytics cookies to ensure that we will give you the best experience of our website - More Info
Accept
top
this is debug window